Confederation Vs Us Constitution Essay

Another difference between the Articles and The Constitution that isn’t commonly held to be an important distinction, but one nonetheless, is the term lengths. Initially under the Articles of Confederation a Senator could be appointed to a maximum of a three year term within any given six years. With the newly drafted Constitution, some of that was retained. Senators still serve six year terms, and representatives from The House of Representatives would serve two. There are no limitations on how many times a representative can be reelected. Most people today would agree that term limits would be better off for Congress so that undue influence from lobbyist from big corporations could be eliminated.

Though the articles did account for a President, he did hardly more than preside over the Congress, there was no power in the Presidency. The Constitution on the other hand gave power to the executive branch headed by the President to choose the Cabinet and be another check to the judiciary and legislature. The Amending document was changed as well between the two, before 13 out of 13 colonies were needed to amend an article, while later 2/3 of both houses of Congress as well as ¾ of State legislature or National Convention were needed. The representation of the States was drastically changed, under the articles each State received one vote regardless of size, in the Constitution the upper house (Senate) has two votes from each state and the lower house would be based upon population.

The Constitution was a much stronger government. Document #4 shows how the framers made a stronger national government under the constitution. Document #4 shows what the great compromise did. It tells us how the Great compromise created a Congress that was made up of two different branches. One branch is the Senate that has equal representation. This means that every State has two Senators. The other branch which is the House of Representatives has representation based on the population of each state. This means that states with higher population have more Representatives. Document #6 shows Checks and balances. Checks and Balances were set in so that none of the Branches of the Constitution would become too powerful.This document shows how each Branch has the power to check on the others. An example of this is how the Executive Branch is allowed to Veto or refuse signed laws. This means that if a law is passed by Congress then the Executive branch can decide whether to carry it out or to veto the law. Checks and Balances are an example of how the Constitution separated

The Articles of Confederation were developed after the Revolutionary War, and were a good idea to help set standards for America. However, they had some major problems that needed to be solved in order for America to become a strong nation. After these problems were addressed the Constitution was developed.

The Constitution and the Articles of Confederation are the same in ways, but they are also, both different. Both of them founded our Government systems, but only one system still remains today. Both systems have their flaws, but also have their advantages. Without the Articles, there would be no Constitution, and the United States would be under the control of a tyrant. The Articles lead us to war, and separated us from Great Britain and now are our own country.

The Articles provided no executive branch,so Congress had the complete authority to govern the U.S. The Constitution provided a president who would enforce the federal laws (Doc 5). The legislative branch was represented by one house, with each state having one vote. Also, no votes were needed to begin an important legislation. The Constitution created a bicameral legislature, and each state had equal representation in the Senate (Doc 5). Unlike the Articles where no votes were needed to enact a major legislation, the Constitution required a small amount of authority to proceed with a major legislation. The Articles of Confederation created no federal court system, so no states could sort out major affairs. The Constitution created national court system that could sort out the affairs between states and citizens. the different states had a changing population of Federalists and Antifederalists. One example of power regulation added into the Constitution is the checks and balances governmental system.This system of government in the branches made it so the three branches could regulate each other’s power. Another example of power regulation, is the addition of the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights are the first ten amendments of the Constitution which protected the individual rights of people. Again, the most major difference between the two guidelines of government was the shift of power. This shift of power altered the political environment of the United States as a young

The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States. They were written during the revolutionary war to create a more unified government, and to establish what the national government could and could not do. The Articles let each state keep “sovereignty, freedom, and independence,” and created a very weak central government. For example, Congress could not regulate commerce or impose taxes. The impact that the Articles of Confederation had on federalism for the next few years was: the federal government had very few powers, and most of the authority remained in control of each individual state.

The Articles were very weak and instable; they were not capable of keeping the country together for very long. The Articles for example were Unicameral, while the Constitution was bicameral. It was just not as strong as the Constitution. The Article did not even have an Executive Branch. United States would definitely not have come to its position it’s in today with the Articles of Confederations. Just look at their way of entering states to the Union, they have to get all of the 9 states to agree on entering it. But that’s not the hard part, the hard part is imagining having to get this news across to every state, it would be a very long Process. While the Constitution just makes Congress enter any new states. America has definitely been a lot better off with United States Constitution!

The Article of Confederation was the building block that created our Constitution. It was prefect as well a lot of things our government creates. In addition here are differences between the two documents.

The simple difference between the Articles of Confederation and US Constitution is that the articles were not strong enough to hold our young nation together. The articles operated the US as separate states. Under the articles, it was very difficult to pass laws since the requirement of 9 out of the 13 states ' approval was needed for ratification. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The members of the Constitutional Convention signed the United States Constitution on September 17, 1787 in

Compare and contrast the Articles of confederation and the Constitution, especially in regard to the specific powers granted to the national government.The formation and ideals of the Articles of Confederation and its successor, the Unites States Constitution, varied from each other in terms of a stronger or weaker federal government in dealing with issues. The Constitution gave more power to the federal government, while the Articles of Confederation involved a very weak government with primary rights interests of the individual states as the focus. Both gave Congress legislative power and set up departments that would eventually be incorporated into the president’s cabinet. The formation of the Articles of Confederation was of the

“The Constitution devotes the national domain to union, to justice, to defense, to welfare and to liberty” (Maier 154). This quote, stated by William Henry Seward, displays the strength and stability that the Constitution had over the nation, and the liberty and justice it supplied for all of its citizens. Although the Constitution and the Articles of Confederation have similarities, they have many differences, which proved that the Articles of Confederation were a weaker document in comparison. It can be said that the Articles were the “rough draft” to the final living document, which significantly influenced and “ruled” our government, as it still does today.

The states have some power, but most of the power is given to the national government, as for the articles it was the complete opposite. The states had all the power, and the national government had very little. Under the constitution, there are 3 branches, executive which enforces law, legislative which makes the law, and judicial which interprets the law. By having 3 branches this makes sure that there was a balance of power, so one branch will not become more powerful than the other. Unlike the articles, the constitution is bicameral consisting of the senate and the house of representatives. Congress was given power to tax and regulate trade, in contrast to the articles, congress had no power. Another difference is under the constitution individuals are taxed by both the federal and state government, as for the article, they are obligated to loan funds to congress when requested, no taxation

The Constitution was a distinct change from the Articles, but similarities between the two do exist. Both documents were established by the same people. The Continental Congress resided over the writing of both. Both documents refer to the country as “The United States of America.” The Articles of Confederation state in Article I, “The stile of this confederacy shall be ‘The United States of America” (Continental 155). As well the Preamble of the Constitution addresses citizens as “...People of the United States” (Philadelphia 171). Both documents were considered the official government of the United States, and

If you try to compare the Articles with the new Constitution, you realize that the former was full of drawbacks, while the latter had answers to all these drawbacks. The Articles was subjected to severe criticism for the very fact that it centralized all the powers in the hands of state government, and left the national government with no major powers at all. As opposed to the unicameral system which was facilitated by the Articles of Confederation, the US Constitution introduced the bicameral system of governance, which was divided into the upper house and lower house. Yet another difference between the two was pertaining to the number of votes each state had. While the Articles had a provision of one vote for every single state irrespective of its size, the US Constitution had the provision of one vote per representative or senator.