Conflated Reasoning Behind Mass Murder

Mass murderers are a diverse group of people. They are a danger to society and it is important to understand the wide variability among these people. The kinds of mass murderers revolve around two central types that branch off to several subtypes. The profile of a mass murderer generally contains a specific set of traits. These people are often driven by one of a series of different motives. In order to achieve their goals, mass murderers have plenty of different methods and weapons at their disposal. Inevitably, the discussion of punishment always ensues when the subject of dangerously destructive killers arises. The study of mass murderers is one that requires analyzing and profiling all of the components that make up a killer, from

Mass murder can be described as a killing of three or more people at one time and one location. There can be many different types of mass murders like organized or unorganized or even family annihilators. Mass murderers have many different traits and features about themselves. Some of the traits that these mass murderers portray can be physical, emotional or even sexual. As for the motives to why mass murders happen, it is very hard to figure that out. There is so many different methods a mass murderer can use to complete his task. A mass murderer can use weapons, explosives, and even vehicles can be used. Mass murderers should get the maximum punishment for the crime they committed.

T.S. Eliot wrote “The Waste Land” in reference to the state of Europe after World War I. The poem paints a bleak, hopeless view of the state of human and political affairs. Eliot refers to London, which was previously prosperous and progressive, as an “Unreal City.” The language of the poem is chaotic and fragmented. The setting of the poem is sterile and barren producing nothing, not even children. Lust which is prevalent throughout “The Waste Land” causes destruction and confusion. Lines 230 through 256 characterize the absence of passion in life. “The Waste Land” challenges the reader to re-evaluate the value of relationships by illustrating a world with empty and meaningless

Many serial killers and mass murderers have been interviewed and tested to reveal why they killed and raped large groups of people. There are several factors as to why they perform such acts. My findings in this paper show that there is a logically explanation as to why they do what they do. In no way is killing or violence justified, but people have been through things we couldn’t imagine being put through. Many of these killers were put through harsh abuse physically, mentally, and emotionally which haunted them in their futures. This caused them to resolve their issues through inhumane ways. One who was put through sexual abuse became lust serial killers by wanting to rape the victims or sexually punish them. They want their

According to the basic principles of global human rights; capital punishment or death penalty is a crime towards humanity and the most crucial and important human right, which is the right to life. As a result, any form of justification attached to it is not valid arguing on the basis of the human rights organization policies. In order to successfully argue out the topic of discussion, this section uses two antagonistic perceptions of the debate namely the abolitionists and retentionists point of view respectively. The aforementioned comes in handy when trying to present the various stands that each group supports and using their stands to analyse and understand the efficiency and effectiveness of capital punishment as a way of striking justice and punishing law offenders.

One thing I have noticed while watching movies, especially while doing the critical viewing, is that we as a society have deemed murder to be ok…. if it’s for the right reason. If a character in a movie has a valid reason i.e. to revenge a loved one, to escape capture, etc... Then we, for lack of better words, encourage murder. We root for the person, even if what they are doing is 100% against the law, we throw that thought to the side and forget about it. In this paper I’m going to give specific examples of times that we deem murder to be ok, as well as give reasons of why we think that we accept it.

The fog plays an important role as Grace attempts to walk through it seeking a priest to rid her home of what she believed to be “ghosts”. However since they are dead Grace and her children are tied to the house and the fog prevents them from going past a certain point. The mood or emotional response experienced by the reader is a very important element that contributes to the overall “whole”. This film borrows themes dealing with insanity and madness, which are direct extensions to the overall concepts of dissociation and denial this film portrays. Grace introduces herself to the viewers as a flawed, emotional and troubled woman.

Many times throughout history have people been classified as a hero to others after that person committed murder on their own kindred. Humans kill other humans for various reasons. In a few cases, murder has proven itself to be justified such as the case, for example, when Caligula, the corrupt Roman emperor has been assassinated to further prevent more disasters for the Roman Empire. Murder is justified even for reasons so unthinkable, it makes sense as the culprit, at that moment of time. Although it is generally bad to be spewing bloodshed over your brethren, the act of killing is justified for murder. In the story of “Just Lather, That’s all”, the protagonist of the story, the barber faces a life-changing decision: “Whether to kill, or not to kill Captain Torres”. Captain Torres, the antagonist is an infamous executioner who has made “examples” of rebels. The barber himself, is secretly a rebel, gathering information on Captain Torres. So when the barber was given an opportunity of a lifetime to kill Captain Torres while the latter was unarmed, the barber in the end, chose to not kill him. However in this case, the barber will be viewed as a hero for killing Captain Torres because of three undeniable reasons. The barber will be portrayed as a hero because he will be killing a murderer who murders brutally. The barber will be defending the rebels cause by killing their common enemy. And the barber will be sacrificing his career and personal life for the good of his

Children of Men is a perfect example of Postmodernism in film. It features apocalyptic stories and setting, shown in both of the clips. In the first clip, the opening scene of the movie, we are introduced to this world of infertility and grayness. Even before we see anything, audio of news reports tell us of the world to expect in the film. In a dreary, gray-toned café, people gather and watch in silence as the news tells of the death of the youngest person alive. The somber hopelessness and fear of the ever-approaching end of humanity is clear. Theo is detached and cool in spite of the horrible circumstances, as are many other characters.

Serial killing is a diverse topic with multiple explanations in order to explain the occurrences. The notion of fear and an inability to fully comprehend the causes of serial killings are evident in this post-modern era. The fascination with serial killing has provided mass media the ability to instill upon serial killer with celebrity status. The main issues that allow serial killers to perform their acts range from Kevin D. Haggerty’s (2009) exploration of social impacts such as the society full of strangers, a broken rationality which is disconnected from values and morality, cultural diversity, ability for planned out killings and an intention to transform society. Nevertheless, these themes are explored in a social context and are seen throughout the post-modern context.

With killing another you have their life in your hands. Such as last year when I came home to my dog laying on the ground suffering through pain. I didn’t know what to do, but we put we put her down because we didn’t want her to suffer anymore then she was. When we put her down, we knew we made the right decision and knowing that she is an a better place not in pain. Killing another is a justifiable act in the case of George and lennie, Hunting for sport, and also in Military ethics.

Murder is considered unmoral in nearly every culture, however every culture sends people to war. Murder us the act of taking another life but is defined very loosely. Instead of changing the ideas surrounding murder the definition of murder is changed. What was once considered a violent, cruel act is now look at as heroism. The circumstances that surround the act define the act itself.

Another idea that deeply concerned TS Eliot was the decaying state of his society. In poem after poem the idea of feeling detached and pushed away from the world sprang out from the pages. The poem entitled Hollow men depicts this idea very well. Here, TS Eliot describes how everyone is just hollow men stuffed with useless knowledge and things he calls ‘straw’.

In conclusion, a plausible foundation has been laid for the theoretical justification of capital punishment based on Aristotelian Nicomachean Ethics. The crucial principles to support this interpretation have been included, and have been extracted from Aristotle’s conception of justice as well as his theory of human action. While the argument for the death penalty relies heavily on the balance between two individuals, the fundamental notions that serve to support this conception do in fact provide an adequate basis for capital punishment. And as such, when the criminal justice system is forced to restore the balance of goods and harms caused by murder, on its face no form of punishment can restore the life of a person whose life has been taken

Murder in the city occurs due to different reasons, and there is an interconnection of various factors that motivate individuals to commit crimes. Key factors for this phenomenon are social, economic, and political. Murder in the city can be analyzed or investigated from sociological approach since those who commit the crimes have to undergo a decision-making process for them to identify who to commit their heinous crime or whether they are justified to do.