Conflict In Yo Yo Santos

My analysis is on the film The Goonies. While I view the movie and determine the various norms, behaviors, roles and interaction between group members, as well as individuals the examination within the realm of film can present many of the same components. Thus, our group selected this movie to analyze based on its formation of a cohesive problem-solving group full of unforgettable characters. The Goonies portray many different theories and aspects of small group communication.

Our analysis is on the film The Italian Job. While we view the movie and determine the various norms, behaviors, roles and interaction between group members, as well as individuals the examination within the realm of film can present many of the same components. Thus, our group selected this movie to analyze based on its formation of a cohesive problem-solving group full of unforgettable characters. The Italian Job portray many different theories and aspects of small group communication.

Stephen King was quoted as saying, “The scariest moment is always just before you start.” A plane crash is bad enough; throw into the mix that the plane crash landed in a vast desert far away from anyone and anything. The team showed great cohesiveness in its ability to get through the groupthink and group shift behaviors. In this paper, groupthink and group shift behaviors will be discussed. This paper will cover points to show how through both behaviors the group will remain cohesive and put aside any individual needs and focus more on the needs of the group. Even though the situation will be tough, the team will plan, find harmony and put their brains together to find ways to survive.

Many people desire to get something, and they fight each other to win their desire. They consider each other their enemies and do whatever it takes to be better than one another. When the enemies need help for same problem, they unite themselves to solve the problem. The short story “The Interlopers” by Saki is about unification and reveals how enemies become allies in harsh situations.

When members in the team brainstorm ideas, they will ask a lot of questions pertaining to the problem at hand and do a lot of research on it. They will also break themselves up into smaller, more workable groups to increase efficiency. In addition, the members do not just limit themselves to finding information online, but they also find out firsthand about the problem from the people who are affected by it. During their firsthand experience, they are very observant and enthusiastic in gaining knowledge from the people affected. Then, they will demonstrate, communicate and share everything that they’ve learned with the other groups. There is focused chaos during the sharing and the members are all very lively, flexible, and open. All ideas are accepted, and no idea is “bad”, no matter how crazy it is. After much sharing, the team will narrow down ideas by voting for them, and the ideas with majority of the votes will be shortlisted. When the members are tired after the brainstorming session, they will call it a day and end off on a positive note.

• There is more than one path to achieve a goal. The majority of the classes at Jones require team problem-solving experiences. The evaluation was more heavily weighted on the collective approach to solving the problem. When teams presented their approach and answers, most teams prioritized and solved the problems differently, yet came to the same, correct answer. This has taught me that diverse thinking enables a greater contribution of ideas.

Let me introduce you to an overview of a book called “Originals,” written by Adam Grant, professor of Psychology at Wharton University of Pennsylvania. His book focus on how to generate new thoughts and battle mindless conformity. Grant achieved this idea by introducing groupthink, a mental wonder that happens inside a gathering of individuals in which the craving for agreement or similarity in the group brings a silly or broken basic leadership result. Also, by utilizing astounding reviews and stories spreading over business, legislative issues, games, and excitement. Indeed, Grant investigates how to perceive a smart thought, talk up without getting quieted, assemble a coalition of partners, pick the ideal time to act, and oversee dread and uncertainty; how guardians and instructors can sustain innovation in children; and how pioneers can fabricate societies that appreciated contradiction.

challenging tasks of such a situation using their wits and persistence. In the book Life Of Pi and

The short film Balance 1990 (2007) was a disturbing way to get the idea of teamwork across. Initially, the team was working so well together, communicating without words. They were keeping life in balance and moving to help others obtain a goal. Members of the team were reading each other’s needs and agreeing how to react to them. The entire team was fishing for one concept; once one obtained it, they all moved to accommodate so they could learn more. Collaboration quickly began to fall apart as they became selfish with the box and music. Selfishness was the profound idea leading to the destruction of the team one by one. Once the greed destroyed the team, it left the single man with nothing but the yearning of what he once had and no way to get it back.

The movie is about three teenage burglars that rob houses because one of the crooks dad owns a home security company and has a spare key to all of the houses. They become quite skilled at this and attempt to rob an old blind man because he was awarded a 2 million dollar insurance settlement after his only child was killed in a horrific car accident. The young burglars think that robbing a blind, retired old man is going to be a walk in the park. As soon as they get into the house they learn that it will be anything but easy. Having a unique storyline keeps the viewer from guessing what is going to happen next. This movie takes a sick twisted turn that no-one in the theater would have ever guessed. Just when you think you're going to guess what's going to happen next, Fede surprises everyone with a sick twist to the movie.

The movie stars a handful of “B” actors and stage actors trying to make a farm house a temporary safe haven while they figure out if and where there is a safer place to go to. The male lead is played by Duane Jones and his opposite female lead is played by Judith O’Dea. The group dynamic plays out quickly in the film. Duane Jones character quickly assess the situation and begins collecting food and barricading the house. After a few minutes people emerge from the cellar and different agendas are at play. The actor played by Karl Hardman wants to take the food into the basement and seal the entire group down there until rescue arrives. Mr. Jones character believes this is a bad idea because they would be trapped. A young man agrees with Mr. Jones and they work together barricade the house.

The first type of conflict is "person versus person," which is when Lionel, his mom, Dr. Loomis were talking together (also includes the blonde woman, etc.). Furthermore, the rest of the conflict as mentioned are mainly happening in Toronto, where Lionel thought he will get his operation done there ("person versus technology"). Similarily, how he tried to run away in such environment and got caught by the manager and the police ("person versus nature" and "person versus society") all happened in

In more specific terms, the theme regarding strife is defined by the various hardships these teenagers presently encounter such as race, crime, education, family issues, and poverty, all of which can be related to our class lectures. Firstly, race is a basic component in the strife that these teenagers experience. In Canada, those who are black are considered to be part of a minority group. Thus, they are usually at a disadvantage in a mostly white society. An example of this is found in the documentary, where the boys mention that they have been stopped by police for no

As people, when confronted with a problem where a solution must be found, our ideal situation is to come up with the best possible one. To do this, we ideally gather the most knowledgeable, intelligent individuals into a group and attempt to derive the best solution to the problem. With the collection of these people, one would think that finding the best possible answer to the problem would be a rather simple task. However, what has happened in many situations is the complete opposite. Rather than finding the best possible solutions, many ideal, cohesive groups arrive at the worst possible answer largely due to problems in communication within the group. This is what we call the radical theory of

Sawyer speaks a lot of truth in this paragraph about how collaboration is what makes all of the amazing innovative teams spark new ideas. Groups should not be self-centered but they need to be empowered by the whole and not its parts. As