1. What is the conflict? Break down the situation using the bullet points of the conflict definition slide.
- Struggle
Changes in my home life
My ability to be more dedicated to responsibilities at work
- Two or More Parties
Myself
Other team members
Team Supervisor
Program Manager program Manager's supervisor
- Interdependent
My responsibilities included assisting with the organization's programming (which would help the program manager and his supervisor ensure delivery of service provided by the organization)
- Strong Emotion
During the meeting there were obvious signs of frustration
- Blockage of needs/values
It was perceived that my home life impacted my a ability to assist in program activities
2. Use the conflict styles self-assessment
…show more content…
I feel like my response to the meeting demonstrated my categorization.
The program manager and his boss seemed to have been using the "competing" style of conflict. They made use of their authority over me by demanding that I put the job first.
3. Use the 'conflict over time' model that maps emotional energy and its response to listening and assertion to identify key moments in the evolution of the conflict situation.
When was there an escalation in the conflict? Why did that happen?
I'm not exactly sure when it escalated. It could have been when the team members had the meeting without me or when I was asked to attend a meeting.
I would say both happened because there was concern that I wasn't supporting the team due to my commitment to the challenges I was facing at home.
When was there a drop in emotional energy? Why did that happen?
Perhaps the drop occurred when I gave up. I realized that there was not going to be a compromise and thought that it would be best to just do what they say.
It happened because I felt like there was no way I was going to win them over. I wanted the problem to go away.
4. Drawing upon all of the readings and lecture for this module, critique the extent to which the conflict was
…show more content…
I wouldn't have left the meeting feeling hurt, or angry by the lack of communication and collaborative outcome driven decision making. As Neil and McNulty discuss, their assertive form of conflict management demonstrated their inability to be an effective listener (also mentioned as very important in the lecture). In my opinion, they had already determined the outcome before our meeting, so there was no need for a back and forth type of conversation. While this may have been successful with someone else, I feel like the situation called for a more understanding assertive style of
Conflict is generally defined by four criteria: expressed tension, interdependence, perceived incompatible goals, and the need for resolution (Wood,
On October 31, 2017 during a meeting with your direct supervisor Nicole Tanguy and Associate Director Melissa O’Karma, you became visibly agitated and walked away from the conversation before it was complete. When asked to return, you proceeded to raise your voice and communicate in a combative tone.
Instructions: Pick three of the four essay prompts below and respond to each in approximately 2 ½ to 3 typed double-spaced pages (20 pts. each). Please do not consult with classmates on your answers. You are welcome to consult class materials, but work to explain the ideas in your own words. Quotations should be rare and brief. Cite pages from our texts parenthetically (Flanagan, p. 158) when paraphrasing or quoting. If you consult sources other than class materials, you must provide a full bibliographic reference. The original deadline was 4PM on Wednesday, 11/29, but I’m extending the deadline in Moodle so that you have until that time on Friday, 12/1, to upload your exam
NOTE:-this Discussion Assignment will be marked on content, analysis, direct references to the readings, the overall
We encounter a conflict in the videos, but first, we need to discover what the two main types of conflict
Describe the conflict in the story. Be sure to include what type of conflict it is, how it starts, develops and is resolved.
2. What are the implications of the author’s arguments for other readings and discussions in this course?
List and explain two things that you learned from the assigned reading for this Module. Discuss the relevance and impact it has on you and society?
At the core of all conflict analysis is perception (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011). In interpersonal conflicts, people react as though there are genuinely different goals, there is not enough of some resource, and the other person actually is getting in the way of something prized by the perceiver (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011).
This exam is to be completed as an individual assignment. Each question is from a corresponding chapter. For example, question 1 is from Chapter 1 and so on. Write 2-3 paragraphs for each of the four questions you choose to answer. In addition to your textbook, you should use and cite at least one other credible source and/or case study for each of the four questions you answer.
In diagnosing the conflict a professional practitioner could use tools such as the conflict models discussed in The conflict resolution toolbox: Models and maps for analyzing, diagnosing, and resolving conflict. These models provide the practitioner the ability to see the conflict from various perspectives and analyze
The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) was originally developed by Kenneth W. Thomas and Ralph H. Kilmann in 1974 (Kilmann, 2013). The TKI assesses a person’s behavior when they are confronted with a conflict situation. For their work Thomas & Kilmann define conflict as any situation when the concerns of two people appear to be incompatible (Thomas & Kilmann, 1974). According to the TKI when a person is in a conflict situation their behavior will go along two dimensions. The first dimension, on the y axis, is assertiveness, a person’s attempt to
Furthermore, I wanted to capture my musings and key passages from some of the books on the reading list, and alternate writings I discovered along the way. A lot of the issues raised in these texts have affected my way of thinking; not only for this module, but also for day-to-day attitudes. The narrative below comes around between 1,000 and 3,000 word limit.
1.1 Conflict→ The practice of recognizing and dealing with disputes in a rational, balanced and effective
The first conflict I’m going to look into is a room conflict in the workplace, with a staff team with different work styles and opinions. A new room leader has taken over the raising two room and the staff are struggling to work as a team and take on roles and responsibilities which is causing a conflict between the staff.