Conflict of Interest in Research

To ensure that a researcher’s enthusiasm for knowledge and understanding doesn’t let them get carried away, clear guidelines for ethical behaviour in research, a Code of Ethics, have been established by governments, institutions and various professional societies such as the American Psychological Association(APA), the British Psychological Society (BPS) and the Psychological Society of Ireland (PSI).

Forester-Miller and Davis’s (1996) ethical decision-making model suggests that the initial step in resolving an ethical dilemma is to first identify the problem and then clarify the nature of the problem. This entails gathering pertinent information that will help elucidate any potential ethical issues. One important matter to reflect upon is whether this dilemma is ethical, clinical, professional, legal or any combination of the aforementioned categories (Forester-Miller & Davis, 1996). Honing in on the nature of the ethical issue will provide some direction as to which avenues are the most applicable for the given ethical situation.

A review of the proposed participants of the study will ensure high-risk groups (if any) will be considered as per the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (‘National Statement’; NHMRC, 2007). While some of these high-risk

This provides a guideline that ensures that researchers minimize the amount of risk a study may impose to a participant. When planning a study, it is also important that each of the participants are provided with a sense of security and not placed at a disadvantage. When participants enter into a study, a level of trust is established, and their identities and the information they provide must be protected and never be used against them or exploited for any reason.

There are a few issues of concern that ought to be considered in every research venture. Firstly, I thought that it was important to direct my research and investigation with the primary point of advancing truth, information, and to keep away from slips that may happen because of carelessness. I attempted to agree to preclusions against distorting, adulterating, or manufacture the given research information. These were gone for staying away from slip and advancing truth.

Another clear cause of the unethical study behaviour lies in the freedom given to the scientists. The researchers

Let’s say I serve on the Advisory Board for DeVry University. In this role I am being paid payments to be a part of the Advisory Board. This is a Conflict of Interest because board members are not allow to receive compensation.

Assessing ethical concerns is of key importance in planning, performing, and evaluating research, and includes four key issue areas of protection from harm, informed consent, right to privacy, and professional code of APA ethics (Cozby & Bates, 2012) These four areas of ethical issues must be considered whenever research involves human participants. Another important area for the researcher to review relative to ethical issues in human research is the importance of gaining an understanding of the internal review board (IRB). The purpose of this paper is to examine ethical concerns, and provide a brief review of the IRB, including when completion of an IRB application is required.

The treatment of conflicts of interest and other ethical dilemmas that may arise in investment decisions.

Conflict of interests is a common problem associated with peer review process, which is contributed to by the internal politics. Economic competition and partner relationships also contribute to conflicts of interests because of the big focus on facts while ignoring the personal feelings and biases. Criticizing colleagues and eventually censuring the friends is a big challenge among doctors. This is because the process involves a lot of work which goes uncompensated. In addition, the process consumes time meant for attending to patients, leading to worse and substandard care.

Ethical theory fails to provide a solution when there is a conflict of interest. A moral theory

Another imperative to conducting ethical marital and family research is to avoid dual relationships. According to Hohmann-Marriott (2001), when a researcher takes on roles in addition to research, conflict of interest may occur. Some common dual relationships that are likely to result in conflict are: therapeutic relationships;

Selgelid, M. J. (2009, January 6). Governance of dual-use research: an ethical dilemma. Retrieved October 30, 2017, from http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/9/08-051383/en/

Firstly, it will affect the independency of the research. The corporations will advice the centre to conduct

Conflict of interest- any relationship, that is not in the best interest of the organization.