The Pros And Cons Of Conformism

Such as chief executives of fortune five-hundred companies or the president of the United States. People in these positions worked their entire life to get their and each day wake up with a desire to achieve. They clearly had ambition from the start to get there and worked hard for many years to achieve it. But, there are people who had smaller goals in life who also had the strong desire to achieve something. Ambition can range from lofty goals such as president of the United States all they way to having a small family live in the suburbs. Yes, some require more effort to obtain but none the less ambition was prevalent. With such a wide range allowed in the actual definition, you cant say that ambition is only for the big dreamers. But one of the many keys to achieve something now is education and that starts at a young

Enron had the largest bankruptcy in America’s history and it happened in less than a year because of scandals and manipulation Enron displayed with California’s energy supply. A few years ago, Enron was the world’s 7th largest corporation, valued at 70 billion dollars. At that time, Enron’s business model was full of energy and power. Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling had raised Enron to stand on a culture of greed, lies, and fraud, coupled with an unregulated accounting system, which caused Enron to go down. Lies were being told by top management to the government, its employees and investors. There was a rise in Enron 's share price because of pyramid scheme; their strategy consisted of claiming so much money to easily get away with their tricky ways. They deceived their investors so they could keep investing their money in the company.

Ambition is a strong desire to do or achieve something, typically requiring determination and hard work. To have ambition means you will never give up on something you are working towards harder than anything else. Fate determines everything. In my opinion, if one thing happens every action after that depends on that one thing that happened.

Enron, the natural gas provider turned trader of natural gas commodities and in 1994, electric, was once touted as the seventh largest company in America. Kenneth Lay, founder, began changing Enron from just a provider into a financial energy powerhouse. Lay took advantage of the dot-com boom of the late 1990’s by creating Enron Online, an internet trading platform. Internet stocks were valued at astronomical prices and were all the rage on wall street, who accepted the increasing prices as normal (Investopedia). On December 2, 2001 Enron declared chapter 11 bankruptcy, resulting in the loss of twenty thousand jobs and billions of investor and creditor dollars. Enron, once designated as "America 's Most Innovative Company" by Fortune for six years consecutively, enacted massive financial fraud at the fault of its top level executives: Kenneth Lay, Jeffery Skilling, and Andrew Fastow.

The meaning of ambition is not always negative. Being ambitious can cause a strong drive to success. In Macbeth, there are two characters, Macbeth and Malcolm that represent good and evil ambitions. Same as Macbeth, the movie Lion King also has two comparisons of being ambitious. They are Scar and Simba. Both of Macbeth and the Lion King give examples of how ambitions have shown when the characters become ambitious because of their desires. However, I believe that ambition can be whether positive or negative. It depends on the goals and how one design the ways to achieve it.

The story of Enron is truly remarkable. As a company it merely controlled the electricity, natural gas and communications sectors of the world. It reported (key word, reported) revenues over one hundred billion US dollars and was presented America’s Most Innovative Company by Fortune magazine for six sequential years. But, with power comes greed and Enron from its inception employed people who set their eyes upon money, prestige, power or a combination of the three. The gluttony took over sectors which the company could not operate proficiently nor successfully.

A nonconformist is a person who refuses to fall in line with society's ideals and rigid structure. Moldbreakers, a person marching to their own drum, even the extent of anarchists can all be synonomis with the term nonconformist. Regularly, nonconformists are fed up with society's visions and wear their beliefs on their sleeves. If you've ever protested or went against a social norm, you can label yourself as a nonconformist. However, when it gets to the extreme of causing terror and mass hysteria, the nonconformist becomes the anarchist and the terrorist. While it is always a good idea to go with your own flow, don't allow yourself to be swept up and thrown into the idealistic rapids. Nonconformity beckons people with the promise of peace of mind with oneself, but does little to warn of the inevitable pitying stares and being looked down on. While nonconformists are usually known for their happiness in the agent of change role they take on, one can't forget about the darker side.

Ambition: an earnest desire for some type of achievement or distinction, as power, honor, fame, or wealth, and the willingness to strive for its attainment.

Ambition is most often referred to as a good thing in today's Society. A child is told that if they want succeed then they must have ambition to get that success, while an adult with a lack of the trait gets frowned upon. In Shakespeare's writings, Prominently Julius Caesar, though, It is quite clear that Ambition drives people to do bad things. The play Julius Caesar is full of examples of this happening as it is arguably the most prominent theme in this play.

The top managers operated in a corrupted fashion They did not even try to produce a positive symbolic management within the organization. Thus, the failure of the company was also the reflection of their moral failing. As a matter of fact, not only there was an aggressive and arrogant culture, but managers were mainly driven by corruption, and greed. They had no space for ethics; their main goal was trading for financial gains. Managers at Enron did not focus on long term goals. Moreover, they did not take care of their shareholders. Executives had neither an open relationship nor a shared vision with their employees. Instead, they were only interested in enriching themselves; according to their philosophy any situation could bring profits, even though this might involve crossing ethical lines. Indeed, the culture of pride, arrogance and greed at Enron made executives look for whichever solution in order to get more and more profits. Because executives wanted to benefit themselves first, all the decisions they took in the board room were made on the only account of how they could earn more. For all the above-mentioned reasons, operational and financial controls were inadequate,

In society, people enjoy rallying behind characters who lead rebellions and revolutions in pop culture, but in real life many prefer those who don’t “rock the boat” even to the point of ignoring objective facts. Peer pressure, self-preservation, and a desire to be like everyone else are the reasons people conform when they have objective facts to say they shouldn’t.

There is nothing that excites me more than the unknowns of a person or society. There are so many factors that shape our lives in so many ways, be that a shared belief in religion, the social expectation of the society, events and behaviours that shape or identity. I believe that social science could satisfy the need for this knowledge.

Once Enron was recognized as a chief competitor in the gas marketplace, it began using capitals to employ its impact on U.S. dogmatic developments. For instance, Kenneth Lay remained indeed one of President Bush’s crucial sponsors through the president’s prompt dogmatic profession. On the other hand, Clinton management retorted to Enron’s politicization by associating the deregulation of power at the national level as demonstrated by the U.S. Division of Energy’s unsuccessful deregulation notice of the central 1990’s. California hooked on the dogmatic burden produced through Enron’s politicization existence in their municipal council and ultimately elected to liberalize their overtly alleged electric efficacies. The catastrophic penalties of this act, comprising Enron’s participation in the, “gaming of the California system,” headed to the Western Energy Crisis of 2000 as well as 2001 have been very acknowledged. Enron charged less on average for electricity than the greatest of the municipally possessed utilities in the Pacific West during the energy crisis. “Enron committed accounting and securities fraud with corporate shell games and derivative that were not exposed by regulators but by stockholders who were knowledgeable that Enron

Ethics in the business world can often times become a second priority behind the gaining of profits and success as a company. This is the controversial issue that led to the Enron scandal and ultimately the fall of this company. Enron Corporation was an energy company, and in the peaks of their success, they were the top supplier of natural gas and electricity throughout America. Enron Corporation came about from a merger between Houston Natural Gas and InterNorth. Houston Natural Gas was a gas providing company formed in Houston during the 1920’s. InterNorth was a company formed in Nebraska during the 1930’s and owned one of America’s largest pipeline networks. In 1985, Sam Segnar, the CEO of InterNorth bought out Houston Natural Gas for $2.4 billion. A year later in 1986, Segnar retired and was replaced by Kenneth Lay, who renamed the company and created Enron. Enron was the owner of the second largest pipeline in America that measured over 36,000 miles. The company was also the creator of the “Gas Bank”, which was a new way to trade and market natural gas and served as an intermediary between buyers and sellers. As the company continued to develop, it became more of a trader rather than a producer of gas. This trading extended into coal, steel, water and many other areas. One of Enron’s largest successes was their creation of a website called, “Enron Online” in 1999, which quickly became one of the top trading cites in the world. By the year 2000 Enron as a company was

The story of Enron begins in 1985, with the merger of two pipeline companies, orchestrated by a man named Kenneth L. Lay (1). In its 15 years of existence, Enron expanded its operations to provide products and services in the areas of electricity, natural gas as well as communications (9). Through its diversification, Enron would become known as a corporate America darling (9) and Fortune Magazine’s most innovative company for 5 years in a row (10). They reported extraordinary profits in a short amount of time. For example, in 1998 Enron shares were valued at a little over $20, while in mid-2000, those same shares were valued at just over $90 (10), the all-time high during the company’s existence (9).