Conformity Research Paper

This experiment was conducted by surveying ninety-six people, 48 males and 48 females, to complete a short survey. The survey asked them if they were color blind and whether they were male or female. They were then given five color cards (blue, green, pink, purple and yellow) and ordered the sample colors from their favorite to least favorite on a scale of 1-5.

In experiment 1, participants were instructed to press a key to determine if the stimulus was red, blue, yellow, or green. On the second half of the experiment, the stimulus appeared in grey with only one colored letter which was positioned randomly. Error rates for the experiment were below 2.5% for each condition, which is quite low. Experiment 2 was the same as experiment 1 except that there were 114 data collections instead of 288 and there were 36 practice trials instead of 72. According to experiment 1 and 2 it is suggested that the effect of

In the first of two experiments participants were shown two faces that appeared simultaneously on a screen along with a single characteristic. They we then prompted to choose which person seemed more likely to fit the characteristic on the screen alternatively, they could choose to respond that they had no gut feeling. The researchers chose to focus on white and black races in particular. Faces were presented in three different combinations: white paired with white, black paired with black or black paired with white. Characteristics were either stereotypes against blacks or were neutral characteristics. Participants were found to be “less likely to make cross-race choices than same race choices and were significantly less likely to make choices involving stereotype relevant than irrelevant traits” (Norton et. al, 2012). It was found that “choice rates for same-race choices did not depend on the relevance of the trait” (Norton et. al,

Each population was being treated on it own the ALI, SLI, and TD. The test was done in DELL laptop with earphones for all participants. The test consisted of 40 different non-word pairs that had minimal differences, as well as 40 non-pairs that were exactly the same. Before the test itself there was a training to explain the participants of which shifts they had to click to mark if the images were the same or if they were different. The training was repeated until the participant fully understood. The exam was self-paced, with the same amount of time in each non-pair interval. The test was divided in equal parts of 44 items. There was a brake in-between the parts and the participant decided when she/he was ready to continue. A stimulus was presented in 1 of 4 ways in order to prevent any distractions in the end of the test. The stimulus was randomized and was presented as equally as

Analyses in this experiment will done using SPSS. An ANOVA for when the faces of both race were paired with a positive or negative judgement will reveal that it is a statistically significant predictor of reaction time. This indicates that participants were faster to respond when their ingroup was associated with a positive trait. Participants will display longer response time for when the outgroup is associated with a negative trait. One-sample t-test will reveal that there is no significant difference in the results in terms of the participant gender. Two-way ANOVA for the interaction between age and reaction time for each of the four test groups reveal that there is no significant differences for both ages.

The researchers placed grey-scale photos of 732 human faces with neutral expressions, which were taken from the Face Recognition Technology (FERET) data base, unto the left and right sides of the visual interface as unrelated stimuli. Upon almost completing the experiment (about 90 minutes in) researchers introduced a reward manipulation. Subjects were told that the remaining time they were required to stay participating depended on how they perform on this final test compared to their previous

In conclusion the experiment was successful since it supported the aim of the experiment and it was consitance ing what Stroop find in his inteference experiment which was that it took longer time for participants to identify the color of the word stimuli since the participants are more familiar with the identification of color boxes and its much more easier than identifying word stimuli since there schemas do not recognize as quickly as it does with just naming colors. However i would do this experiment again but instead i would associate the time it takes identifying colors of boxes and word stimuli if the participant had a 3.5 gpa or avove and the time it took a participant to identify color boxes and the color word stimuli if the participant

I also only choose people that have normal vision, in other word, not color blind. There were two groups of people among them that have different experience with video games, regardless of their gender. I had divided them into two groups (gamers and non-gamers) based on their answers on the questionnaire that I gave them a day before they do the experiment. Among the people who answered the questionnaire, I picked six people that are having a high video games experience or in other words, they always playing video games during their leisure times, while, the other six participants were people that are not into video games or having a low or none video games experience. All of the participants are non-native speakers of English language that are currently living in United States, but they must be able to speak in English and able to understand the instructions given during the experiment. There were rewards given to each of them after they completed this experiment.

Next, they were divided into two different groups in which they were placed in the Self-Share/Other-Norm group or the Self-Norm/Other-Share group. (Smith et al, 2013, p. 2) In the Self-Share/Other-Norm group, the children were allowed to share their stickers with another child and were also asked how many stickers their friends should share. (Smith et al, 2013, p. 2) In contrast, in the Self-Norm/Other-Share group, the children were questioned on how much they themselves should share and they also wanted the children to predict how much another child had actually shared. (Smith et al, 2013, p. 2) Additionally, children in the Self-Share/Other-Share group received two inhibitory control measures which were the Day-Night Task and the Bear-Dragon Task. (Smith et al, 2013, p. 3) In the Day-Night Task, the children sat at a laptop and were shown two pictures, one of a sun and the other of a moon. They were looking for a response day or night depending on what picture was shown to them. Next, in the Bear-Dragon Task children participated in the task just as the experimenter showed them and then they were shown two puppets. They were asked to respond to what the bear inquired and to not respond when the dragon questioned them. After all experiments had been conducted, the children were asked to explain their responses and then were scored based on their response. Children believed that a norm of

detection task to decide on two display; one a study and two a test, that were being displayed back-to-back. The conditions that Parra, Cubelli and Sala used in their research consisted of were that of same trials and different trials, alterations to the display of colors. The alter the colors in areas that were on the internal grid or the external grid. (Parra, Cubellie, & Sala, 2011) The participants completed 15 practice runs then were to complete the task itself which consisted of 24 same and 24 different trials. Each of the trials were selected randomly and the conditions were counterbalanced for all volunteers. The findings in this study were that of a higher percentage of correct recall and recognition. The condition found a significant main effect

The study included 40 participants: 20 males and 20 females. Each participant participated in 10 facial recognition tasks. Each task showed a group of faces for approximately five seconds. After those five seconds, the participant was presented one face and had to state whether or not this

Psychology college students attending the University of California, Los Angeles were asked to complete this experiment as a course requirement. The sample size was twenty-one students. When conducting the experiment, we did not ask if the students had any disabilities such as color blindness or blindness. Every student just went through with the experiment without any questions being asked. All participants were asked to be the experimenter and the subject of the study.

Seventy five students were recruited from a large southeastern University to participate in the experimental study. Twenty nine were male (39%) and forty six were female (61%). The age of the sample ranged from 17 to 29 years with a mean age of 22 (SD = 2.56). This included 9% Caucasian participants (n = 7), 69% Hispanic American participants (n = 52), 1% Native American participants (n = 1), 13% African American participants (n = 10), 2% Asian American participants (n = 2). The remaining three participants did not report their ethnicity (4%).

Their aim was to measure how often the subjects notice a change with their choice during and after the experiment. The experimenters presented two photographs of female faces and after that they were asked which one they find the most attractive. After the experimenters gave them a closer look at the photograph that they choose, they asked them to immediately explain why they chose that photo. The results turned out that most of the subjects failed to notice that the picture they were looking at was not their original choice and the explanation of their choice was: “I prefer this one because I prefer blonde” when his original choice was not a blonde but a brunette. Most people would have notice that change but the results shows that 75% of the trials were blind to the

Four participants entered the room at one time; two experimenters and two respondents. The respondent was instructed to stand in front of the apparatus with their entire dominant hand resting on the table. They were also told to place their dominant hand behind a tape mark, with all fingers and the palm on the table. After each trial they were instructed to return their hand to the taped position. The experimenter would choose what set of five audible and five visual cues to use, but would also tell the participant which set would be used. After one set of five stimuli, the opposite (visual or auditory) set was selected until two auditory and two visual sets were completed. The experimenters and respondents then switched roles after the respondents had finished their sets. Every fifteen minutes two new experimenters and two new participants replaced the previous participants until all trials had been completed. The respondent’s times were recorded on the data sheet to a thousandth of a second and entered into Excel program, ensuring accuracy.