preview

Conformity To Risk-Taking

Good Essays

Conformity to risk-taking of adolescents versus adults. Individuals are more likely to conform when behaving publically rather than alone. This may be based on the need to meet the group’s expectation in an attempt to gain acceptance and appear favorable. However, the way social groups influence individuals’ attitudes and behaviors varies, and a reason for these variations may be due to age. Gardner and Steinberg (2005) investigated the effects of peer pressure on risky thoughts and behaviors and how these factors influence different age groups of adolescents, young adults, and adults. Gardner and Steinberg (2005) hypothesized that risk taking thoughts and behaviors decrease with age, risk taking thoughts and behaviors will increase when …show more content…

(2011) investigated the psychosocial factors involved with risky driving patterns associated with adolescent novice drivers. Simons-Morton et al. (2011) installed computerized recording systems in the vehicles of newly licensed adolescent drivers that measured their driving patterns, and the traits of their passengers. The results indicated that accidents and near accidents were significantly lower when in the presence of responsible adult passengers, and significantly higher when in the presence of fellow adolescent passengers (Simons-Morton et al., 2011). In addition, the results indicated that adolescent risky driving was significantly lower when in the presence of responsible adult passengers than when in the presence of fellow adolescent passengers (Simons-Morton et al., 2011). Lastly, Simmons-Mortons et al. (2011) found that overall risky driving was highest when newly licensed adolescents had risky friends as passengers. With the use of confederates and a driving simulator, a similar study by Quimet et al. (2013) proposed that adolescent drivers would participate in more risky driving patterns when in the presence of pro-risk-taking passengers than when in the presence of non-risk-taking passengers. However, the results were mixed in that safe and unsafe driving characteristics were found in all conditions and no significant difference was found between the driving patterns of adolescents, regardless of the traits of the confederate passenger (Quimet et al., 2013). A common limitation related to both of these studies is that the sample size was quite small only possessing about 40 participants. This may make the findings difficult to generalize to the population. Another limitation that may make the findings difficult to generalize to the population was found in the latter study with Quimet et al. (2013) in which the researchers only utilized male volunteers. Also, the use of only one passenger in both of these studies may

Get Access