Essay on Conformity and Political Control

America is a land of very diverse people from all parts of the world. They all have wide varieties of interests, which are represented by both parties of its political system. The Democrats and Republicans represent two different standpoints; although they concentrate on the same issues both of them have different views on how the issues should be addressed. Two presidential campaigns in which the parties’ candidates differed on the issues are that of 1988 and 1996. Democracy only works when the people who represent the masses differ on the issues, so that to protect our freedom and the parties of our political system are the best representation of this ideology.

The very first U.S. president, George Washington, once declared the danger of political division, warning “they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines.” He continues his claim with an explanation of the negative effects that parties can cause in government. Despite this wise, respected man’s heeding, the U.S. has quite obviously split into two major parties, Republican and Democratic. Americans have allowed their personal opinions and preconceived notions to jeopardize the efficiency of government. It seems that the title of a party overpowers the importance of individual ideas. A 2014 poll further emphasizes contemporary idiocy. According to a National Science Foundation study, only three out of four Americans are aware the Earth revolves around the sun. Despite the conclusive and extensive scientific research regarding the topic, these people are entirely unaware of their insignificance in this universe, solidifying their knucklehead status. Ignoring the facts, their preconceived conclusions run their lives Even in a day and age with unbelievable technology and access to information, humans, especially Americans, have armed themselves with nothing but firearms and

There are copious Americans who believe that the political party system is shattering our nation. In my opinion, our nation would not be the nation we are today without political parties. Other than presenting candidates and electoral campaigns to the electorate, political parties perform innumerable tasks to better the United States of America. They serve as institutionalized mediators between our society and duly elected representatives who are responsible for determining and executing legislations. They seek public policy priorities and civic needs and concerns identified by their affiliates and supporters. Political parties educate the people on how the political, electoral system, and general political values work. By doing so, voters are well informed of each party’s stance on specific matters. They also inspire individuals to participate in political decisions and turning their outlooks into policy options for all. Unlike other countries, America is a democratic nation we want our people to freely voice their thoughts and support the party who shares their interest and perspectives. In addition, political parties help to annihilate any unexpected shifts in political trends that hold the ability to disrupt the balance of our government. As we all know our nation is a two -party system that assist in advocating stability in the government, because there will only ever be two

Geography matters politically. Varying states have significant, cultural, and political differences. For example, high-income liberal Democrats in San Francisco have varying concerns than middle-income liberal democrats in Cleveland, and low-income liberal democrats in Texas. This also includes the continuous divide between rural and urban communities in America; this in particular aided Trump’s election. Individuals in urban areas are more likely to vote for Democratic candidates, while those in small towns and low populated areas are more likely to vote Republican. Gelman mentions the history of rich states in the Northeast, Midwest, and West Coast generally having higher rates of unionization with large cities or areas near large cities. Such locations associated with the tradition of immigration has perhaps led them to be more politically liberal on social issues.

Geographically, how the territory is shaped as a major influence on what happens in an election. When you have the different sizes of districts it can come down to a win/lose situation. There are many examples throughout history of how gerrymandering has influenced and changed political outcomes, in this paper we are going to be looking a couple of different examples in order to see why the movement and location of the various districts has an impact. For this paper I am going to start by looking into historical impacts of gerrymandering, and what it has done for maps and territories. Secondly, I will then look at a specific example, North Carolina and Maryland and study how the changing of the given territory will impact the political election. Finally, I will look at gerrymandering system as a whole and the pros and the cons it has on the geographical

Political socialization begins early on in life and is an ongoing process affecting individuals throughout. It is how people eventually identify personal beliefs and expectations in American politics. These political views can include our level of patriotism, faith in the democratic system, standards by which we hold governing bodies, and opinions regarding public policies. From the playground to the classroom, the office to the dinner table, much of our lives affect our political opinions. The most easily identified agents of this are family, schooling, peers, mass media, political parties and religious influences. Furthermore, these means indoctrinate us in the political society through four basic

This extreme belief system has created a separation of people within America. Where most of people become divided and joint political parties according to Marlantes is on the topic of big government, global affairs, taxes, Americans safety nets and many other issues. When people’s values conflict with what is happening around them, they quick try to find the group or political parity that will support or come close to what they believe in. In Liz’s work she tell of how the current split in America is due to the verifying cultures. According to her this unusual split is caused by people’s values and morals. Because Republicans tend to be white Americans that go to church and Democrats tend to be whites that don’t go to church it is easy to lean toward the party that reflects your values and morals. Because the partisan is so deep between the two parties there is no middle ground for those who are usually unbiased or don’t associate with a political parity. They are instead forced to side with one side or the other. These parties have become a culture on their own. It is easy to see how a person who lives in exurban place, with a collage education are usually Republican and a person how lives in a unban city and has a Graduate degree supports Democrats. These factors of place, money, view, morals, and values have slowly created a deep divide with in our society and our political

Any government with total control is worth being feared and having a group of individuals who go against their government. With complete control, a government is capable of committing acts against their citizens, which can be perceived as “something good” from the government’s point of view. In 1984 by George Orwell, and “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut, the main characters, Winston and Harrison, feel oppressed by the government's acts and events, try to overthrow their government, and go through a realization of hopelessness and defeat.

As a society, we are gradually losing faith in our political system. We live in a country casted by a shadowed of dark cloud, clouds of lie and arrogance. The Vietnam War, a war in which we are set up to believe is a war against communist, a war in which the United States felt they could have won, yet didn 't. We brainwash our children to believe that the Indians and the pilgrims enjoyed a festive celebration yet we don 't acknowledge that we wiped out almost their entire population and take over their land. The foundation of our political system is based on sovereignty and equality where every votes count yet we all know that the country wealthiest corporations and non-profit organizations influence the political system. Their money and domination control who is elected into office thus making the rest of the country unwilling to cast their vote. Under the constitution, we are programmed to trust and believe in our political system, that all man are created equal, yet history have proven endless counts of racism and hatred in our country. since the assembling of our Constitution, we have not strive far from the inequality and control that we have set out to change. The United State is still trapped in the past.

During the late 1950s and early 1960s intellectuals such as David Riesman, Irving Howe, William Whyte, and Daniel Bell critically analyzed what they perceived as ineffectual social conformity and political disengagement. Each had their own unique take on what exactly was wrong with mass society in the prosperous years after World War Two. Each had a different definition of conformity and aspects of society and politics were the cause of that mass society. By looking into these intellectuals writings it is possible to perceive what their criticisms with society were and what alternatives to conformity they advised.

In the first text, it is argued that voters support political candidates in conformity to its appearance and using it as its main reason, showing no interest in its academic background or profession. Moreover, it suggests that voters’ confidence in such politicians is directly related to their image as well. Likewise, to my mind, a person that displays care and attention for its look immediately conveys their professionalism, quality and values. As a result, there is an inevitable correlation between the looks a person exhibits and the friendliness and faith voters feel towards him/her. Therefore, criticizing politicians’ attempts to transmit a part of themselves and their ideals through their presentation is unfounded, provided that they do

Many times over people have been against the grain. We are seeing it more today than ever. Mainstream people do it a specific way while some don’t like it and do something different. Some would argue that being nonconformist is actually being a conformist. This is true. This especially happens when a nonconformist became a nonconformist for the sake of being non-conformist. Nonconformity is just a different type of conformity.

How can you control the masses and influence their decisions? When a government lies to its people, and funds it’s so-called “enemies” then at that point, you realize how corrupt a government can be and wonder what else they are lying about. The United States should stop funding, aiding and sending weapons to the enemies that they created.

1. Why do organizational structures differ? What is the difference between a mechanistic structure and an organic structure? Which structure would be most appropriate for an innovative organization like Apple or 3M? What about an organization that focuses on cost-minimization like Wal-Mart?

All these political science articles seemed to come to one similar conclusion, that there is a motive that influences someone to vote whether it be some way or another. Many of the few influences tested, ranged from social pressure mailings to single based issues.The articles argue that although something can influence one to vote it cannot be the only factor that influences a person 's political behavior.