Cons Of Animal Testing Research

Animals are very different from human beings and therefore make poor test subjects. The anatomic, metabolic, and

Animals have successfully been used to understand biological processes, assess safety of different chemicals, develop vaccines and antibiotics, produce treatments for hepatitis C, rheumatoid arthritis, polio, diabetes and many more . However, it is impossible to know if the use of animals was required to acquire this research or if the amount of suffering and death could have been reduced or avoided in order to achieve the same results. It is well established that animals have been invaluable in the pursuit of biomedical research, and the benefits from using animals currently means that eliminating animal research is also immoral. This is because the benefits received from some research greatly outweigh the potential costs to the animals and it would be unjust not to perform such experiments. Consequently, animal research should not be fully banned due to the benefits it yields, but should be more heavily regulated to reduce the moral costs.

Animal testing enthusiast explains how research has enabled the expansion of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals. Enlightening that there are no alternative methods for researching complete living organisms, totaling that there are strict regulations to prevent abuse of animals within laboratories (Lawrie, 2014).

Every day, thousands of animals in laboratory cages undergo painful experiments. After three dogs were forced to ingest an experimental drug every day for five days, they experienced difficulties breathing and a high heart rate. One dog died and the other two were put to death one day later. Animal testing is beneficial for scientific growth but is very cruel and inefficient. Laboratories that have grown human organs and are testing them are getting better and more accurate results than a laboratory that runs tests on animals. ( humanesociety.org )

Animal experimentation has become very a controversial topic in the United States of America today. In many countries it is still legal to poison, blind, and kill animals for cosmetic uses. While many of the experiments conducted on animals today is required by law, most of it is not. In fact, many countries have placed bans on the testing of certain products on animals. Thousands of animals every day are euthanized owed to animal testing. Due to of the care that animals are enduring, people debate whether animal testing should be implemented at all. Some people believe that animal testing is beneficial in many ways. The people that see animal testing as beneficial say that without animals, medical developments and the military would not be

Many sources have claimed that animal testing has contributed to nearly all medical cures in the last 100 years. For example, in an experiment where dogs had their pancreas taken out, scientists discovered insulin. Animal testing has allowed some advancements in cancer research among other things.

The first main argument to support the use of animal testing based on humans and animals structures similarity.

Animals are very different than humans and therefore they make poor test subjects. They make poor test subjects because of the cellular, metabolic, and anatomic differences. Animals act, look, and are made very differently compared to humans. How will you be sure the product will not be harmful just because it didn’t hurt an animal? Approximately 92% of experimental drugs are dangerous of humans even though it did not affect the animal. [Cruelty]

They run the tests on the cells in the dish. In this process, no animals or humans were harmed (Rogers).” By using this method, scientists can receive more accurate results. People could also volunteer or use computer molecules. Another study by Doctor Elias Zerhouni, the former director of U.S. National Institutes of Health director, says there is a new study using “organ-on-chips”. The organ-on-chips are human body cells. Since they are human cells, they can mimic parts of the human body. They are able to mimic the function and structure of the human organs and organ systems. This test is called In-Vitro testing. This type of test can be used for many things.For example, the scientist use this is drug test in drug testing, diese research, and toxicity testing. The results of these

According to Sean O’Neil, the author of the article “Why Animal Research is Still Necessary” says “Almost every major medical achievement has relied on animal testing at some stage in the process …. as were the polio vaccine, lithium and penicillin.” (O'Neil). Just so you know, penicillin has saved 200 million lives since it’s invention in 1928 (Alexander Fleming). Another example is blood transfusions. Dr. Ananya Mandal, MD says the first successful blood transfusion was done by Richard Lower in 1665. He tested blood transfusions on dogs. Since then, blood transfusions have saved over 1 billion lives, which is significantly higher number than the entire population of the United States (Mandal). If animal testing was not used, then forget about 1.2 billion people getting saved. Ha whatever, that’s just the entire world population of 1850. Some more examples of medicines or knowledge about conditions or diseases being found by animal testing is breast cancer, childhood leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, lung cancer, Hepatitis C, heart disease/stroke, epilepsy, and many more (Animal Research Benefits). Not only does an abounding number of animal tests lead to medical breakthroughs, but sometimes a new cure for animals is discovered. An example is insulin. Both people and dogs suffer from diabetes. Insulin was tested on dogs and now helps people and

Due to biological differences between humans and animals, experimentation on animals creates inaccurate results, making

Pro/Con Speech- Animal Testing
Purpose: To inform the class about the pros and cons to using sexual content in advertising.

Ultimately, in spite of its proponent’s insistence that animal testing is necessary because animals make good models for the human body, and even if it is inaccurate scientist have addressed this with the way that testing data is gathered. Alas, animal testing is inaccurate because of invalidity of their very premise. Animal models are inexact. The costs of animals being used as models for humans are erroneous data, misleading information, and dangerous drugs. Those consequences are too

In conclusion, animal research has both its pros and it also has its cons. Both sides of the argument have valid foundation on which they base their arguments. Maybe animal testing is a good thing, marked with too much perceived cruelty. But, maybe it is a matter of direct abuse, with over-exaggerated outcomes being revealed to cover what is really going on. The sides chosen by others depends on their moral choices and human animal relationship that they experience. Whatever the view taken by the policy maker, politicians, and the groups arguing for or against, two things are clear: Animals should not be made to suffer needlessly, and animal research has reach wonderful treatments that have made the world a better place.

1. The differences between animals and humans leads to incorrect information and test results during trials.