Cons Of Capital Punishment As A Wrongful Ethical Act

Debate over capital punishment is nothing new, but it reaches a whole new level when the accused is mentally ill. The question then becomes… was the perpetrator aware of his heinous actions by knowing right from wrong at the time of the crime or was the mental illness controlling his actions? While being sympathetic to the grief and heart break of the victim’s loved ones, I believe that execution for the mentally ill should not be allowed, because often their illness makes them incapable of knowing right and wrong of their actions. Many of those with mental illnesses often go undiagnosed and untreated, either by choice or by financial circumstances, because of the stigma and general lack of understanding associated with this type of diagnosis in our society.

The PROs and CONs of capital punishment both have some merit, no matter how controversial. CONs of capital punishment: Once someone is convicted of a crime punishable by death, it is close to impossible to be given a chance at a retrial. So on the off chance that a prisoner has been wrongly convicted; he/she will most likely die an innocent person. Another CON for capital punishment has to do with the subject of mental illness. Since 2006, Texas has made an effort to educate people on the subject of executing people with severe and documented mental illnesses.

There are many pros and cons when discussing whether or not the death penalty should be used. Proponents in favor of the death penalty claim that it saves the government money by not forcing taxpayers to pay for the cost of housing inmates in prison, and help reduce prison overcrowding. Those who are in favor of the death penalty also believe that it is a reasonable punishment for those who commit heinous and violent crimes, and that use of the death penalty deters possible offenders. Also, some believe that it helps ease the mind of the victim’s family because they know that the offender will never harm anyone

The death penalty is quickly becoming one of the more controversial topics in the United States. Currently, there are 31 states where capital punishment is legal. As of April 2016, there have been 1,431 executions in the United States, but the number of executions in recent years has been steadily decreasing (Timmons 2017). The death penalty can be put up for moral debate, and one can ask oneself whether the death penalty is ever morally permissible. There are some pros and cons to having capital punishment. For example, deterrence and prevention are good reasons to have the death penalty, but, in reality, the cons far outweigh the possible benefits that may come from capital punishment. The cost of imposing capital punishment is

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, eighteen states have abolished the death penalty since its implementation (Facts About the Death Penalty). But what are the reasons behind doing so? Historically, public policy concerning capital punishment has shifted dramatically, from required capital punishment to jury nullification to a rise in the abolition of the practice. Public opinion has shifted alongside policy, with more and more Americans disapproving of the death penalty and the morality behind it, citing it as an inhumane and hypocritical approach to justice and punishment. I am with the the more progressive Americans that do not believe in administering the death penalty under any circumstances. Rather, I support life imprisonment or the insanity defense for capital offenses whenever appropriate. Capital punishment is ineffective because it lowers the state down to the level of the defendant, frequently discriminates against racial minorities and those of lower socioeconomic status, and it has been abolished in nearly every other modern democratic country.

The topic I chose to present on was the ethical arguments surrounding the death penalty. The death penalty as defined by Merriam Webster is "Punishment by death; the act of killing people as punishment for serious crimes". The method for execution is determined by the courts, the people harmed and by the state. Each state has their own laws regarding death penalty and methods of carrying it out, vary. The death penalty is reserved for serious crimes of which include rape, murder, and treason. Capital punishment, in its many forms is not at all unique to the United States, as many other countries carry it out also. There are many ethical concerns surrounding death penalty as well as arguments from both sides to whether or not death penalty

Capital punishment is one of the most controversial ethical issues that our country faces these days. Capital punishment is the legal penalty of death for a person that has performed heinous acts in the eyes of the judicial system. Discussion on whether capital punishment is humane or considered cruel and unusual punishment has been the main issue this of debate for years. Recent discussion goes far beyond the act itself but now brings into question whether medical personal should aid in this practice.

PRO: "The crimes of rape, torture, treason, kidnapping, murder, larceny, and perjury pivot on a moral code that escapes apodictic [indisputably true] proof by expert testimony or otherwise. But communities would plunge into anarchy if they could not act on moral assumptions less certain than that the sun will rise in the east and set in the west. Abolitionists may contend that the death penalty is inherently immoral because governments should never take human life, no matter what the provocation. But that is an article of faith, not of fact. The death penalty honors human dignity by treating the defendant as a free moral actor able to control his own destiny for good or for ill; it does not treat him as an animal with no moral

The death penalty is a highly-debated topic among Americans, and although proponents for capital punishment slightly outnumber those who oppose it, the number of executions in the United States has sharply declined in the past two decades. Those who hold strong negative opinions about this issue argue that there is not enough compelling evidence to indicate whether or not the use of capital punishment is a crime deterrent, and others argue that minorities represent the majority of those executed, which is grossly unfair. Lawmakers have succeeded in passing legislation that has improved how executions are carried out, and over the course of history, the justice system has at its disposal more effective tools to determine a person’s guilt or

Punishment is defined as a penalty inflicted on an offender through judicial procedure or, in simple definition, the act of making one suffer. Parole, fines, incarceration, and probation are all forms of punishment. The idea of punishment is not limited to imprisonment but extends back to the Ancient times of banishment and back to the year 1792 when the first person was beheaded by the guillotine. Today the most notable and extreme form of punishment is capital punishment, or the death penalty. As of 2016, the amount of states that have authorized the death penalty is 32 and the amount to have abolished it is 19, which leads the question of, how ethical is punishment? The ancient philosophy of Stoicism took

previously discussed that have played a vital role in what capital punishment looks like today in America. More recently there has many more reversed cases because of the fact of DNA. Many people that were on death row have been freed from prison because of newly discovered DNA evidence. These findings of innocent people have caught the attention of the Supreme Court Justices, political leaders, religious leaders, and even people who previously have supported the death penalty. Many people question the death penalty in light of these findings, they believe that maybe the death penalty is not an ethical choice for punishments because the risk of innocent people being put to death, and the fact that there is no way of completely eliminating

Many who disagree with the death penalty believe it is immoral, discriminates, is very expensive, increases crime, and is only a way to carry out revenge. This, however, is not true. Capital punishment should be legal because it is moral, by not allowing criminals to roam the streets once again. It does not discriminate against those of color or the poor, and is actually less expensive than life imprisonment. The most important reason why the death penalty should be legal is because it deters crime.

Since the mid 1900’s, capital punishment has brought many individuals into many diverse view points throughout the years. Capital punishment is a way of punishing a convict by killing him or her because of the crime he or she committed. Capital punishment will always have its pros and cons. There are opponents who absolutely disagree with capital punishment. And then there are advocates who support the idea. In the advocates view point, capital punishment is a way to minimize the threat in the world today. In the opponent’s point of view, opponents disagree with capital punishment, because of the high expenses it brings to the states. Also, opponents argue that capital punishment

Capital punishment, the practice of killing people as punishment for serious crimes, has been used in the United States justice system since 1846. Throughout the years, there have been numerous ethical concerns, calling for the use of capital punishment, to become a practice of the past. However, are you aware, there are as many economic issues surrounding the death penalty, as there are ethical issues? At first, it may seem that execution, is a less expensive alternative to life in prison, nevertheless the assumption is wrong. Once, the process of a capital punishment case has been completed, the cost is more than double the price, of a life sentence. The United States is the only country, in the western world, which currently allows capital punishment to take place. 20 people were executed, in the year 2016, as a result, the country threw away millions of tax dollars to terminate people, who otherwise could have spent the rest of their days behind bars, for a cheaper price (Execution List 2016). The economics of capital punishment are more complicated, than they may seem; factors such as, cost of the incarceration, trial, and lethal injection all contribute to the overall cost.

Capital punishment could be the reason that crime rates are evolving. Individuals are more averse to perpetrate a crime realizing that there is a plausibility for them to be executed. Spending life in prison is sufficiently reasonable to offenders as opposed to capital punishment and along these lines they are more inclined to perpetrating the crimes instead of considering the outcomes. The death penalty discourages people from carrying out violations, as well as ensures that lawbreakers get what they merit. Supporters of the death penalty trust that offenders ought to be executed if a murder is engaged with the crime. The years with the most minimal crime rates were amid the mid-1960s. Capital punishment began to end up noticeably extremely questionable with just 47% of U.S. nationals supporting execution (Desilver, 2014). It was exhibited that as crime rates diminished, bolster for execution diminished also, with a positive relationship between both crime rates and support for the death penalty. 1991, be that as it may, was the most exceedingly bad year for fierce violations in the United States and of course it was where the clear majority bolstered the death penalty, around 80% of Americans (Desilver, D. 2014). This demonstrates bolster for execution varies all through time and groups of the casualties are thought about when the theme of capital punishment comes up. There was an expansion of capital punishment supporters following the time of 2001, where a