Cons Of Standardized Testing Essay

Second, these tests work fine as they are now. The students and teachers know what to do on these

My first reason standardized tests are not a good idea is that they overpopulate the schools. Texas takes 15 and Indiana takes 5. The tests take away time from learning more about a subject. Our country as a whole takes way to many standardized tests. standardized tests are overpopulating schools and not letting kids learn more parts of the subjects.

Standardized testing has become a controversial topic in recent years, parents, students, teachers, principals and almost anyone who has a relationship with education is affected by this topic. People are either for or against standardized testing, some believe it is the only fair way to compare students others believe that the tests are too greatly stressed in school and are a nuisance to education. Standardized tests are stressed greatly, students learn testing material all year not focusing on anything else deemed unimportant by the test makers. Every student has the same amount of time and question on tests; they also are tested on the same subjects which the test makers believe are most important for children to learn. Standardized tests are used for many things such as ranking students on a national basis and government funding for schools.

The results aren’t given back to the teachers and students until weeks later, and there are no instructions provided by test companies on how to improve these test scores. The testing companies do provide books and study programs. The programs may help some people but not all people.

In various ways, standardized test are beneficial from tracking students’ progress over the years to not allowing teachers emotions to get in the way of the testing process. Standardized testing sets expectations high for students and it does hold them accountable for the same standards, which may lead to achievement gains. By looking at the students’ performance they will be able to determine how well they retain information. Also the school is able to learn what their students are able to do and what they cannot do compared to other school districts, so they would be able to improve their education system. When giving more personal assessments, it is very possible “that the teacher or person assessing the student can let their emotions or biases affect how they score that student” (Young). In most cases, standardized tests are objective. There are wrong or right answers, and there is no room for feelings or emotions. Standardized testing gives teachers guidance to help them determine what to teach students and when to teach it. Tests are highly accountable and reliable as they judge the candidates on a common platform across states and nations. Standardized testing is “a simplified way of timeline management” (A Look at the Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing). Standardized testing gives parents a good idea of how their children are doing as compared to students across the country and

Standardized tests work along the lines that all students learn at the same rate, which is not true. It's unfair to compare students from different districts, states, and countries when they all have different curriculums, and work at different paces. Standardized testing only looks at the book material that is taught in school, and does not put any value on any of the arts programs; and does not look at any personal aspects such as social skills, creativity, team working skills, or work ethic; and therefore is not an accurate measure of improvement in young adults. Standardized testing is not in place to test the skills necessary to succeed in life, standardized testing is in place to measure how good students are at mindlessly consuming information, and then regurgitating it back up in the form of bubbles filled in with a number 2

Possibly the most pressing, and also ironic flaw in determining scholarships based on ACT/SAT results is that the scores determining the amount of money a student receives, is decided by tests that benefit affluent families. In an interview conducted by Blaire Briody, a journalist who's work has appeared in several storied news franchises such as The New York Times and Popular Science, a man from New York named Jeffrey Arnold said that he recently spent $1,250 in prep classes to boost his daughter’s ACT and SAT scores. Another parent in New York said that she will spend over $2,000 for an SAT tutor for each of her two sons. When asked why they spend so much money on these prep courses, their answers were very similar in that they both felt that tutoring was not only going to benefit the scores, but said that the tutors are necessary because everyone else was also using them. (Briody) In an article by Ann Carrns, a writer for the New York Times, she mentions a New York-based tutor, Anthony-James Green. Anthony-James Green has recently gained attention with his steep fee of $1,000 per hour of tutoring. While it is proven that students that he works with see

But once students took the test the schools have found a more ¨positive effect¨ on the student's achievement."in direct support of higher expectations, strengthened standards and better tests.” (Source 5). Also Schools have acheieved the significant schools award for all the students doing good on the test and for the teachers and staff helping them out in school so they get a good future. ¨20 school systems that "have achieved significant, sustained, and widespread gains" on national and international assessments used Department of Education stated in Nov. 2004.” (Source 5). After taking the Standardized tests students have been getting better grades and have been understanding the topic in all the classes and teachers and staff say that they will get a better future now.”Standardized tests provide accurate comparisons between sub-groups. These sub-groups can include data on ethnicity, socioeconomic status, special needs, etc.” (Source

Standardized tests are tests that is administered and scored in a consistent manner. Any test in which the same test is given in the same form to all test takers is a standardized test. The term-standardized test is often heard along with high-stakes testing. Standardized tests are administered, scored, and interpreted in a consistent way, so that the results of large groups of students can be compared. This type of test allows teachers and administrators to see why a child might be struggling or succeeding on specific elements of their grade-level standards. The results that come back from these standardized tests help inform the next step in learning for our students. There are many pros and cons that go along with standardized tests as well as ways that it can affect both the teacher and the students in the classroom.

Testing has always been in schools since schools have started. Testing helps the teachers know where the kids are at in their learning. There is a lot of controversy going on about all of the standardized testing that goes on in the schools now. A lot of emphasis is put on the children to make sure they do their best on the tests. There are teachers and parents that want the testing to stop because of all the pressure it has put on the students. Columbia University has done research on the pros and cons of standardized testing. Standardized testing is too much for the students and puts too much pressure on the students to adequality test on their grade level.

Picture a monkey, elephant, and fish all being told to climb a tree to pass a test. It seems like an unfair advantage, right? That’s because it is, and standardized tests have the same effect on students. The dispute of whether standardized tests should be given to students or not has been going on since these tests were first given. Students should not have to pass a statewide standardized test before graduating because every individual has a different way of showing knowledge, students get test anxiety, and everyone possesses different learning levels.

What is your view on standardized testing? Are they stressful? Do they test your knowledge or do they do the exact opposite? I believe that standardized tests should not be required for students to take because they test your memorization skills not your knowledge on a subject, they cause unnecessary stress on teachers and students and they promote cheating among the students.

Standardized testing is a down fall to many students but also an opportunity for many others. Standardized testing has its pros and its cons. It can be the make it or break it factor into getting into colleges you are hoping to attend or the scholarships you want to earn. Some people may have their opinions about the test, whether they hate it or not but the fact is that it’s here to stay.

Standardized tests are exams that are supposed to measure a child’s academic knowledge but have long been a controversial subject of discussion. Although it is one method to see how a child is performing, is it the best method? Standardized testing can be biased or unfair, inhibit both the teacher’s and the children’s creativity and flexibility, affect funding for schools, cause untested subjects to be eliminated from the curriculum, and cause anxiety for children and teachers.

The debate on standardized tests and its adequacy in testing a student’s knowledge about a subject has been going on for many years. Tests, in general, has been around for centuries and without them there would not be progress and no gleams of progress. Students ranging from elementary school to high school have experienced standardized testing. Teachers, educators, and parents are also involved in the students’ lives, which revolves around the tests, one way or another. There are many views on standardized test. However, the three most common views are: educators who are for standardized test which benefits students, educators who are at the other extreme of opposing standardized tests, and educators who view tests are a benefit if done in appropriate amounts.