Cons Of Standardized Testing Essay

My first reason standardized tests are not a good idea is that they overpopulate the schools. Texas takes 15 and Indiana takes 5. The tests take away time from learning more about a subject. Our country as a whole takes way to many standardized tests. standardized tests are overpopulating schools and not letting kids learn more parts of the subjects.

Would you like to take a test that is unfair, expensive, and unreliable? Chances are you already have. Standardized testing in schools is not only bad for the students, but also bad for our country’s future. Some might think standardized testing is a good thing, because it is the only way to measure all students the same across the country. However, this thought is wrong for many reasons.

But once students took the test the schools have found a more ¨positive effect¨ on the student's achievement."in direct support of higher expectations, strengthened standards and better tests.” (Source 5). Also Schools have acheieved the significant schools award for all the students doing good on the test and for the teachers and staff helping them out in school so they get a good future. ¨20 school systems that "have achieved significant, sustained, and widespread gains" on national and international assessments used Department of Education stated in Nov. 2004.” (Source 5). After taking the Standardized tests students have been getting better grades and have been understanding the topic in all the classes and teachers and staff say that they will get a better future now.”Standardized tests provide accurate comparisons between sub-groups. These sub-groups can include data on ethnicity, socioeconomic status, special needs, etc.” (Source

“Standardized test are not even necessary because it barely shows what we already don’t know. It has proven to just be a waste of money and even teachers will tell students that there is no need for the testing” (Jouriles). Plenty of needs for the state can be taken care of if the state would let standardized test go and distribute the test money to other needs. The test are rigged anyway therefore, students cheat because the curriculum is too hard. “The performances from the assessments are not great and that is mainly because the tests are not taken seriously and the information is not relevant to what has been taught” (Jouriles). With that being said standardized testing is neither worth the budget nor importance of education.

In various ways, standardized test are beneficial from tracking students’ progress over the years to not allowing teachers emotions to get in the way of the testing process. Standardized testing sets expectations high for students and it does hold them accountable for the same standards, which may lead to achievement gains. By looking at the students’ performance they will be able to determine how well they retain information. Also the school is able to learn what their students are able to do and what they cannot do compared to other school districts, so they would be able to improve their education system. When giving more personal assessments, it is very possible “that the teacher or person assessing the student can let their emotions or biases affect how they score that student” (Young). In most cases, standardized tests are objective. There are wrong or right answers, and there is no room for feelings or emotions. Standardized testing gives teachers guidance to help them determine what to teach students and when to teach it. Tests are highly accountable and reliable as they judge the candidates on a common platform across states and nations. Standardized testing is “a simplified way of timeline management” (A Look at the Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing). Standardized testing gives parents a good idea of how their children are doing as compared to students across the country and

Standardized tests work along the lines that all students learn at the same rate, which is not true. It's unfair to compare students from different districts, states, and countries when they all have different curriculums, and work at different paces. Standardized testing only looks at the book material that is taught in school, and does not put any value on any of the arts programs; and does not look at any personal aspects such as social skills, creativity, team working skills, or work ethic; and therefore is not an accurate measure of improvement in young adults. Standardized testing is not in place to test the skills necessary to succeed in life, standardized testing is in place to measure how good students are at mindlessly consuming information, and then regurgitating it back up in the form of bubbles filled in with a number 2

Standardized tests have a natural connotation of being negative, useless, or time wasting. They take away valuable classroom time from teachers and their students. Most of the time, assessments are given before the material supposed to be taught has been presented to the students. Therefore, students are at a disadvantage when it comes to taking these “fail or pass” tests. However, tracking students’ progress was the original purpose and push for having standardized tests. Standardized tests should be given for their original purpose, but not in the multitude or manner they are currently presenting students with.

Second, these tests work fine as they are now. The students and teachers know what to do on these

The infamous standardized exam is a consistent tool used to measure all students on the same scale to get the most accurate results possible. The standardized tests have been becoming the number one thing that colleges look at when looking at an applicant’s form rather than the GPA like in the years before. The reason for this is because in modern day high school the GPA isn’t that accurate because now there are a variety of different courses you can take as well as teachers that are stricter than others affecting the “measuring stick” like in the standardized exams. These tests are also used to determine if a child has learned the basic skills and material to pass on to the next grade seen in grade school. An option presented by anti-standardized test associations are teacher made tests and assessments. The biggest problem with this is that “teacher graded assessments are inadequate alternatives to standardized tests because they are subjectively scored and unreliable.”(Procon) This is 100% true because a teacher can give their assessment to the students and have no idea what level they are at and the students are without a doubt going to fail the test. Standardized test are perfect because these tests are prepared by months and months of handouts around the tests. Therefore the students will have an idea what they are

Possibly the most pressing, and also ironic flaw in determining scholarships based on ACT/SAT results is that the scores determining the amount of money a student receives, is decided by tests that benefit affluent families. In an interview conducted by Blaire Briody, a journalist who's work has appeared in several storied news franchises such as The New York Times and Popular Science, a man from New York named Jeffrey Arnold said that he recently spent $1,250 in prep classes to boost his daughter’s ACT and SAT scores. Another parent in New York said that she will spend over $2,000 for an SAT tutor for each of her two sons. When asked why they spend so much money on these prep courses, their answers were very similar in that they both felt that tutoring was not only going to benefit the scores, but said that the tutors are necessary because everyone else was also using them. (Briody) In an article by Ann Carrns, a writer for the New York Times, she mentions a New York-based tutor, Anthony-James Green. Anthony-James Green has recently gained attention with his steep fee of $1,000 per hour of tutoring. While it is proven that students that he works with see

Testing has always been in schools since schools have started. Testing helps the teachers know where the kids are at in their learning. There is a lot of controversy going on about all of the standardized testing that goes on in the schools now. A lot of emphasis is put on the children to make sure they do their best on the tests. There are teachers and parents that want the testing to stop because of all the pressure it has put on the students. Columbia University has done research on the pros and cons of standardized testing. Standardized testing is too much for the students and puts too much pressure on the students to adequality test on their grade level.

Schools should not have standardized tests because, kids are to stressed and it waist to much time when kids could be learning something new. After my research I have came to the conclusion that there are many different opinions and concerns about weather standardized testing should be required or not. Each opinion has some logic but there are just some thing that don’t make much sense. Some people see it as a competition between students to see who can get a better score. Also if some people don’t get the score that they wanted it could put their self confidence down and make them not want to try as hard next time. They feel like these tests prove how smart they are to their parents, students, and friends.

Picture a monkey, elephant, and fish all being told to climb a tree to pass a test. It seems like an unfair advantage, right? That’s because it is, and standardized tests have the same effect on students. The dispute of whether standardized tests should be given to students or not has been going on since these tests were first given. Students should not have to pass a statewide standardized test before graduating because every individual has a different way of showing knowledge, students get test anxiety, and everyone possesses different learning levels.

Standardized tests are tests that is administered and scored in a consistent manner. Any test in which the same test is given in the same form to all test takers is a standardized test. The term-standardized test is often heard along with high-stakes testing. Standardized tests are administered, scored, and interpreted in a consistent way, so that the results of large groups of students can be compared. This type of test allows teachers and administrators to see why a child might be struggling or succeeding on specific elements of their grade-level standards. The results that come back from these standardized tests help inform the next step in learning for our students. There are many pros and cons that go along with standardized tests as well as ways that it can affect both the teacher and the students in the classroom.

What is your view on standardized testing? Are they stressful? Do they test your knowledge or do they do the exact opposite? I believe that standardized tests should not be required for students to take because they test your memorization skills not your knowledge on a subject, they cause unnecessary stress on teachers and students and they promote cheating among the students.