Consequences And Effects Of The No Child Left Behind Act

But, a standardized test does not do either accurately. Studies conducted in the past decade have shown discrepancies in the evaluation of teachers. For example, in a September 2010 report made by the Annenberg Institute for School Reform, they tested the same students, teachers, subjects, during the same time of year, but used two different tests. Over 17% of Houston teachers that were ranked at the top of the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills reading tests were ranked among the lowest two categories on the Stanford Achievement Tests. Even with the top teachers, there are many different factors that contribute to a student’s performance on a standardized tests. And measuring a student’s achievement using tests given in only a small piece of the school year cannot give the whole picture of a student’s education. Also, out-of-school factors contribute greatly to a student’s performance, such as race, class, disabilities, and knowledge on the English language. In fact, researchers calculated that a teacher’s influence on student test scores ranges from 1% to 14%. Then, why are we still evaluating teachers using standardized tests? If standardized tests do not even do the job they were supposed to do, then it is not an effective way of improving the education of Americans

The No Child Left Behind Act has an enormous impact on children and their families. Major impacts concerning families are standardized testing, transfer options and delivery of supplemental services. Concerns have risen questioning how beneficial are standardized tests. According to Michele Brooks, “many parents believe that testing is necessary to determine whether students have mastered the skills at grade level, while other parents fear that dependency on test results does not provide a full picture of student and school performance, and encourages "teaching to the test" instead of high quality instruction. The high stakes nature of testing in many states has also raised concerns among parents and education activists around the increase

The No Child Left Behind Act (NALB) was signed into law by the former President of the United States George Walker Bush on the 8th of January 2002. It was a congressional attempt to encourage student achievement through some reforms focused on elementary and secondary education programs in the United States. The NCLB requires that within a decade all students including those with disabilities to perform at a proficient level on their state academic evaluation tests. The stated goal of the NCLB is to make certain that all children receive a fair, equal, and a significant chance to get a high-quality education, and reach, at a minimum, proficiency on the challenging state academic achievement assessments and

There is no evidence that support that teachers will be more motivated to improve student learning if they were evaluated for increase test scores but by basing teacher evaluations on inadequate standardized tests is a recipe for flawed evaluations. The problem with standardized testing is that they are narrow and have limited indicators of student learning. These standardized tests leave out a wide range of important knowledge and skills.

In a telephone and online poll, Americans were asked two simple questions: One, if in their opinion, is there too much emphasis on standardized testing in the public schools in their community, not enough emphasis, or about the right amount? Sixty-four percent of the national total said there was too much emphasis, while seven percent said not enough emphasis and nineteen percent said about the right amount of emphasis. The other ten percent declared they did not know. Second, whether they favored or opposed some states requirement of a teacher evaluation including how well a teacher’s students perform on standardized tests. Fifty-five percent of the national total said they opposed, forty-three percent were in favor, and two percent said they did not know. “Many Americans also said they think students should be judged by multiple measures, including student work, written teacher observations and grades. And they overwhelmingly think teacher quality is the best way to improve education, followed by high academic standards and effective principals.” The No Child Left Behind Act, passed in 2002, mandated students to be tested in math and english and made it mandatory for the school's scores to be raised every year or face

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 is a “landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America’s schools” (ED.gov). The new act encourages accountability and helps abolish inequality in education.

In 2002 President Bush signed into act the No Child Left Behind act. This act changed normal standards for children attending public schools. Schools now had standardized test that measures the student's academic growth. The students test score no longer impacted just themselves, but their teachers and school districts as well. Schools now had to reach a certain standard to receive federal funding. While the No Child Left Behind act was put into place to help students, a large outcome of this act was negative. U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, describing the Act as “a slow-motion train wreck,” (weigel 1)

Another reason that standardized test should be limited in public schools is that it is not a true measure of a student’s performance. There are many factors that can threaten the validity of standardized testing scores. A student’s

These tests are the most efficient way and, even further, the only way of knowing this data. Additionally, they aid in providing courses with a protocol for how to set up their classes with what should be taught/learned and at what pace. However, these tests are no longer serving their original purpose resulting in negative effects that threatens the learning process. What is not being considered here is what the tests aren’t taking into account. Peters’ experiences once again come of great use in determining just how ineffective these tests may be in accurately determining student knowledge. “‘I could tell you which kid was just having a lucky day and which kid was in the tank that day, meaning they probably just blew the test off,’ she said. ‘A number of my lowest performing students and highest performing students, I didn’t think were accurately reflected in the tests’”(Peters). There is a multitude of factors that even standardized tests can’t measure. As standardized tests are ineffective when it comes to what they can and can’t measure, who’s to say that what they can measure is

Standardized testing is used in every school and in nearly every grade in the United States. They are used to judge the performance of students and to determine the proficiency when compared to their peers. A teacher’s performance is also evaluated based on the results of their student’s tests.

​The United States of America is among the countries in the world that highly focus on the education of its citizens. The country’s government allots sufficient funding for its education, thus the country is considered the number one nation that spends on per student than any other nation in in the world. With the high price of education and the high cost of funding, the country aims to ensure that all public schools in all states achieve quality education. The “No Child Left Behind” Act is America’s law that expanded the role of the federal government in education reform, particularly focused on improving the education of marginalized American students. At the core of this act are various measures in increasing student achievement. It also puts emphasis on the accountability of states and schools for student achievement and progress. The law ushered important changes in the education of Americans in various aspects including annual testing, academic progress, report cards, teacher qualifications, curriculum, and funding. It continues to set a benchmark for the achievement of desired level of quality of education in all states in America. Through the years, the “No Child Left Behind” Act is faced with controversies and debates by various educators, policy makers, groups and individuals in America (Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, No Child Left Behind, edweek.org).

The No Child Left Behind act is the Bush administration's sweeping educational reform, aimed at improving the performance of the nation's public schools by introducing accountability. Supporters of the act claim that it will increase the performance of all school children by raising the standards and allowing parents greater freedom in choosing the school they want their child to attend. The act also puts in place a system of punishment for schools if their student body does not perform to the standards set down by the National government (NCLB act). As well as increasing standards, this act also encourages teachers to use a curriculum which the government developed with "scientifically based research" (a

Throughout the years there have been many changes throughout the education department. In the early 2000’s the main idea was for all students to be equal (Croft, Roberts, & Stenhouse, 2016). In 2001 the No Child Left Behind Act went into effect. The act was to have statewide testing and schools must record in grades 3-8. The education department in each state determined that they wanted every student to be proficient by 2014 (Neill, 2016). Throughout 10 years that the No Child Left Behind Act was in effect, there were no significant gains in students achievements. The student 's scores made the government realize that it was going to be impossible for every student in the United States to reach proficiency (Croft et al., 2016). Knowing that not every student can reach proficiency but yet Obama is increasing teacher’s accountability through high stakes tests scores of students.

The No Child Left Behind Act was to be President George W. Bush’s signature legislation coming into Office. After being delayed by the 9/11 Terror attacks, the act received wide bipartisan support and was passed into law. Its purpose was to “close the achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, so that no child (was) left behind” ("One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America" 2008). In addition, “No Child Left Behind (aimed to continue) the legacy of the Brown v. Board decision by creating an education system that (was) more inclusive, responsive, and fair” ("A Guide to Education and No Child Left Behind-- Pg 13" 2007). Essentially, they were aiming to improve education with a problem definition amounting

What if there was a time in which students weren’t being required to take an assessment to pretty much go over if they were actually learning something in school. Sounds like it would be a great time, right? Not having to worry about so many exams and such, however, how would the teacher know if one is actually learning? Assessments were given out to students, yet weren’t required. That’s when the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 was placed to ensure schools were being required to assess the students, and put forth standards and regulations for students to pass. Primarily this act was in accordance to those within the lower income neighborhoods, because the main purpose of enacting the NCLB was to correlate with Title I Funding, which