Consequences Of Forging The Ethics Triangle

A. (2.) Analyze the ethical issues at stake in the scenario and distinguish from legal matters.

People from all walks of life face many ethical dilemmas. These dilemmas have consequences. Our worldview determines how we deal with these dilemmas, and guides us to the right decisions. In this essay, I will examine an ethical issues through my Christian worldview. I will also present other viewpoints, and compare them to mine.

To conclude the exploration of this ethical dilemma, a decision and brief summary will be

There are many ethical dilemmas that occur daily in our hospitals across the world. Not everyone agrees with standards and policies that are required in hospitals or even with the law. If not everyone obeys the law, ethical cases form. In Springfield, Missouri, a holistic nurse got fired for fighting against Cox South hospital policies. Carla Brock has been a nurse at Cox South hospital and not only refused the flu shot, but also refused to wear a mask. She refused due to religious beliefs, she gets short of breath while wearing the mask, and she feels the mask is meant to intimidate and humiliate those who refuse the shot. The ethical question in this case study is to decide if Carla should have been fired for not wearing a mask after refusing the flu shot and what are other potential proposals. The four-way method will separate out what are the truths, consequences, fairness, and character, of this ethical case study.

No member of upper management, supervisor, and employee of a company should destroy knowingly a document with the intention of obstructing and influence an investigation or administration of any mater within the jurisdiction of any government department, agency, or in relation to contemplation of any such

The government selects contract proposals from many competitors large and small, and each proposal must be effective in scope and developed with an attitude of winning the contract. From the e-Activity, select two (2) of the suggested commandments that you feel are most important to understand in order to write a government bid proposal effectively. Provide a rationale for your selection.

In addition, the grandmother’s use of gender roles is unsuccessful when trying to persuade the Misfit because the Misfit is vengeful person who is taking retaliation for the injustice he experienced. She places too much trust into the Misfit believing that he “won’t shoot a lady, would you?” (7) because of the men’s gender roles: men are taught not to harm a lady. However, the grandmother disregards the injustice the Misfit experienced which is the reason for her lack of logic when using gender roles as an argument. It is highly possible the Misfit is killing others so they can experience the unfairness he experienced. By conducting these misdemeanors such as murdering a family, he feels compensation for the iniquitousness the American justice

A contract/document issued by an employee who has the authority to issue is not valid

If Walker had a legitimate and dutiful motive for carrying out the changes to the campaign finance, ethics, and John Doe investigatory standards, then the governor should have taken additional steps to insulate himself from the policy changes. For example, the Governor could have postponed the rule changes until the end of his political career (final term), thereby removing the perceived incentive to position himself against future ethics violations. While it is impossible to address the ethical implications of the policy change itself, the ethically dubious manner in which the two matters were passed. Because it is difficult to wholly understand the motive for these changes, given the nuances of the political system, any suggestions posed in this paper must be limited to the Goerner’s decision to spearhead the shifts in policy.

We have been asked to analyze numerous contract documents and Trego/Dugan’s denial of Starr’s tender. The documents that we have been provided are:

Dear Leo, -I had a conversation with my case manager Ms., Mila from WSIB she told me that I needed to go to a specialty clinic to get a new diagnosis on my soft tissue injuries because you sent her such referral for me nonetheless I was never informed by you nor you discussed such referral with me in my first visit to the physiotherapy clinic where we met and you completed form 8 for WSIB conversely Dr. Daniels as a family physician with high ethical standards with his professional practice got very concerned that I might had internal bleeding when my co-worker took me after picking me from the stairs injured and upon my request he drove me to his walking clinic where my co-worker narrated to Dr. Daniels as a witness my accident Dr. Daniels

Virtue: The action of disregarding the state standards for assessment developed primarily from a desire to protect the citizens of Kalamazoo, not a desire for personal gain or job stability. Assuming this to be true, the actions taken by the city officials reflect the virtues of caring, responsibility, and citizenship.

To address the ethical issues that were faced that day, there are assumptions that need to be analyzed and separated into two groups, first set applies to an individual or a small group of individuals and the second group applies to a larger structured group of people such as a corporation.

Unfortunately, the reasons are far more deeply rooted than just criminal tendencies. According to Chuck Gallagher (2014), in his article from the Compliance and Ethics Professional journal, there are three main bad behaviors, commonly called ‘the fraud triangle’ in ethical circles. These behaviors are need, opportunity, and rationalization (p. 26). Need is the primary emotional state that begins the transformation from ethical to unethical decision making. It could be financial need; it could be the need for power. Opportunity is the ability for an individual to commit the unethical behavior. No matter how much need someone may have, if there is no opportunity, it will not happen. Service members have a multitude of opportunities to

There are some people in this world that believe that good is defined as raising a family, doing good deeds and protecting other people from harm. However, there are others on this earth that are raised to believe that killing and stealing is neutral and not evil in any way. This idea can be thought of as this: it is possible to grow up in the United States, where it is common knowledge of what neutral, good, and bad are. However it is also possible to grow up in a terrorist organization somewhere else in the world. Growing up in this type of environment would promote killing the innocent and stealing from everyone, like pirates. To prove that it is possible that man has the ability to have a different view on morality as a whole than someone else, I can use the second example.