Consequences Of Mortality In Hamlet

1100 Words5 Pages
What truly, are the consequences of mortality? What is a rather complex question, mortality can be defined as the state of being subject to death; however the influence of such a powerful aspect in life is truly dependent on those associated with its impact. In perspective, perhaps death itself can be considered a tragedy, whereas the life of a loved one has perished. In other circumstances, the death of a fascist leader could be regarded as beneficial, or even considered as a miracle. Subsequently, the capabilities of death are solely dependent on its given circumstances. Fortunately, William Shakespeare is able to associate the cause and effect of death throughout his pieces of work in a beautiful fashion like none other. Particularly in the play Hamlet, authorized by the notable Shakespeare himself, death was an inevitable force that compelled many actions as the plot of the story advanced forward. From the ghost of Old Hamlet speaking of a treasonous murder to the passing of the noble Hamlet, death was a prominent characteristic within the play Hamlet as it was expressed through actions, the progression of the story, and through the desolation of characters.
At an attempt of vengeance for his father, Hamlet’s only viable course of action was to kill Claudius in order to allow for retribution. As mentioned numerously throughout the play, Claudius assassinates Old Hamlet with the coward’s weapon of poison for both political and envious reasons. As such, Old Hamlet appears
Get Access