Consequentialist Theory And A Virtue Theory Analysis

I believe virtue is anything that may be advantageous in one’s own way. It may be good, it may be bad in

Sophisticated consequentialism is a hybrid, as it adopts the ideological tenants of both modalities of consequentialism and allows for the nuance of personal relationships to at times, override the adherence to a presumed action based upon the tenants of consequentialism. The sophisticated consequentialist may accept the reality that saving their one true love, is ideologically less beneficial than saving the three strangers, however the consequentialist would also take into the account of their personal feelings and the perceived total good that they may experience with that person over a lifetime as more beneficial than saving a higher quantity of strangers. At this, the sophisticated consequentialist is adopting the subjective consequentialist view of the intent to save one’s love, and experience more moments with them and bring about a higher amount of happiness than saving those three strangers. In this, I believe that sophisticated consequentialism is giving credence and importance to the personal point of view, as a textbook definition of a consequentialist theory would point to saving the

Virtue Theory, following the guidelines of what a virtuous agent would do.What are the guidelines and what does it even mean? In “Virtue Theory and Abortion”, written by Hursthouse the author elaborates on how virtue theory a concept that is becoming well aware against deontological and utilitarian theories. The essay is divided into two parts. In the first part Hursthouse presents these theories, and then argues seven criticisms towards the virtue theory. In the second part of the essay, the author expands the understanding of virtue theory by applying it to a moral issue, abortion. Hursthouse, states she is not going to unravel the conflict of abortion, rather implement the virtue theory and how it will guide us on the way we view abortion.

judgment you use, whether good or bad, will be solidified by the decisions you choose to make.

When thinking and making decisions, I use my ethical beliefs wholeheartedly. I try and think before I do, this is something that my aunt always told me over and over…that, and think before I say. In today’s society with so many topics that are of sensitive nature to others, it is very difficult to believe that there are still those out in society that are not aware of others. My inventory summary suggests that I am most closely aligned with obligation. This makes sense; I do feel that is my obligation to ensure that my actions and behavior are ethical. I am least closely aligned with equity.

This essay will provide a theoretical understanding of the four ethical frameworks: Consequentialism, Non- Consequentialism, Virtue Ethics and Care Ethics. When applied to a situation these frameworks help teachers to resolve and justify their decision making. The objective is to apply the four frameworks to the scenario Helping Molly, to establish the most ethical course of action. Finally, a recommended course of action will be justification. The overarching ethical issue present within the Helping Molly scenario is the community sponsorship and the alignment with school beliefs and initiatives.

Ethics and virtue have been a very contentious issue facing society for centuries. Many argue over the merits of various theories, each with its own philosophies and assumptions. It is this argument that has given rise to many popular and followed theories of ethics and virtues. The theories discussed primarily in this document include the virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological theory. Each is very distinct to the others in regards to its principles and assumptions regarding human behavior. Each however, has merit in regards to question of ethics and virtue, and how it should subsequently be valued.

Morality tells us that something is morally right if it is morally permissible, and morally wrong if it is morally impermissible, but this does not tell us what actions, if any, are intrinsically wrong, no matter what the circumstances are. The consequentialist view of morality holds that an act is the right one if and only if it produces more good consequences over bad consequences, overall. Again, this does not tell us what actions are good or bad, just that the consequences are the only thing that matters when morally judging an act. In this essay I will argue, from the Consequentialist perspective, that torturing someone, even if this was the only way in which we could obtain information that would save thousands of lives is morally wrong

Consequentialist: Focuses on the result of an action. The act is considered a good act if the result is good, likewise and act is considered bad if the result produced is bad. Under the consequentialist theory, we have Egoism and Utilitarianism.

Same-sex marriage has been an ongoing issue in the United States for decades. In many States, the issue has been stirring up tension between proponents and opponents regarding legalization of same-sex marriage. On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples are allowed to marry in all States. According to the statement of the holding, “the Court now holds that same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry” (Kerr). Although homosexual couple marriage is allowed, opponents still vehemently argue against the issue because of religious or moral conviction. To make a counterargument against them, I will discuss several philosophical points based on Kantianism, Utilitarianism, and Virtue Ethics in favor of supporting

The three major schools of ethics consists of: consequentialism, natural law, and virtue ethics. Consequentialism means that the judge of if something is right or wrong is based on the consequences of the action. Utilitarianism is apart of this theme, which means one should act to produce the best good thing for the most people. Natural Law means through logical thinking on nature, discover actions that are good and bad that will help us move forward in human fulfillment and growing. This means that human beings can make a reality of their potential Virtue Ethics consists of two different approaches to ethics.

A consequentialist action is a utilitarian theory. The utilitarian theory is a choice between two acts that can maximize utility for the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarianism is the moral worth of an act. Utilitarian takes the right proportion of utilities to promote happiness and prevent pain. Utilities is the expressed quality of happiness or satisfaction one gets from something (Mossier, 2013). Happiness comes in many levels of preference. However, the downside to utilitarianism is identifying different levels of pleasure. Identifying different levels of pleasure can be counteracted by an irrespective feelings to a moral obligation making the pleasure more desirable (Mills, 2008). Utilitarian is not the agent’s own greatest happiness, but the greatest amount of happiness altogether. One of the most important social roles is conscious gratification in convey what is gendered equality on jobs, in health care, and with education utilizing the utilitarian theory. Acts like changing policies to promote gender equality that utilize skills and knowledge of women for the greatest number of people from the greatest amount of happiness is utilitarianism. Gender equality ought to be about equal justice. Held (n.d) contrasts the history of male and female ethics in an article titled “Feminist Transformations of Moral Theory.” Held (n.d.) writes, “but, we can hope to agree on the minimal conditions for justice, for coexistence

There was the life cycle, which in those cases consisted roughly of self-maintenance and reproduction.

For the framework, we chose consequentialist theory for the ethical decision. The consequentialist theory focuses on the results or consequences of the decision the company made. The ethical issue we had is the behavior United Airlines had when they took out a passenger and their response after the incident. After the video of Dr. Dao being dragged down the aisle of the airplane went viral, the company’s first response was to apologize for the overbook situation but did not make any reference to Dr. Dao. The next statement from the CEO Oscar Munoz was to apologize to the passengers on the plane, and informed that they were trying to reach out Dr. Dao but did not mention more about him. In the following statement, the CEO stood for their employers

you ask what the virtues are, it is likely you would be told that we