Conservative Republican Approach

The debt ceiling debate really comes down to your individual view on fiscal economics. If a person follows the general conservative view they recognize the fact that a government can only spend as much as it takes in. A liberal point of view would see a country’s spending as a necessary part of keeping a functioning society, and that debt is a side affect of this process. If a country continues to build insurmountable debt, an individual or business is less likely to invest in that country’s bonds or economy in general because they may worry about whether they will be able to cash out and get their money. This depreciation in investor confidence could eventually lead to a drop in the country’s credit rating from the major financial institutions. A drop in credit rating for a country’s bonds shows an overall lack of stability for that country. A decrease in investments in bonds and stocks for a country can hurt GDP and eventually send the country into a recession due to the governments inability to run efficiently.

To reduce our national debt, which is 3.8 Trillion dollars in 2012 according to (Doc B), We should stop handing out money and start loaning out money, cut some money from all of the Big five programs and stop spending the money America doesn't have.

The Democrats have diminished spending in military and sunk money into activities that’ll accommodate the nation. Whereas, Republicans have increased their spending, regardless of the nation’s debt.

Many United States' citizens are unaware of the country's current financial state. Many assume that one of the world's wealthiest countries could never be in debt. This is untrue however, and, in fact, the country with the greatest income per capita is in major debt. This study will examine possible solutions to reducing the United States' national budget deficit.

Many believe the country's dramatic decent into debt began with a choice, not a crisis. In January of 2001, with the budget balanced, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) forecast that the nation would have over a $2 trillion dollar surplus by 2010, enough money to pay off the entire national debt. In the years following 2001 political leaders chose to cut taxes, increase spending, and wage two wars solely with borrowed funds (Montgomery, 2011). Today the national debt is larger, as a percentage of the economy, than at any time in U.S. history except for the period shortly after World War II.

I agree that a solution to fix the issue of the national debt is to increase taxes by fifty-seven percent or cut all government spending by thirty-seven percent. Although I agree with it, I think there maybe a way to improve it without making things awkward. Increasing the tax percentage could fix our problem, I just wonder how the younger generations will handle this considering the financial situation they are dealing with now with high student debt and other economic factors. Cutting government spending is not necessarily a bad thing. However, if you cut spending on vital programs like Medicare, the quality of products from the programs may not help us the way they were meant to

Similarly, the Obama administration recommended significant tax hikes, planned for the future. Some of the items that the Obama administration had recommended were tax hikes on included liquor, cigarettes, plane tickets, and soft drinks. Furthermore, the many tax breaks that had been enacted under President Bush were discontinued. President Bush had implemented tax cuts on capital gains tax, income tax, and estate

There has always been a constant battle between how the government’s spends its funds, whether how the funds will be used for school, or for social services, it is an item that holds great weight when discussed. The Economy is discussed in numerous ways by both platforms. The Texas Republican platform mentions that government spending must be addressed. They discuss in depth how to address the issue of overspending and deliberate on several tax

In 2009 the debt was amounted to about $12 trillion , or 83.4 percent of the country’s GDP (“Budget of the United States Government: Historical Tables Fiscal Year 2011” table 7.1). Since 2003, the debt has been increasing by more than $500 billion annually. The increase in 2009 was $1.9 trillion. According to the Congressional Budgeting Office, this debt will keep increasing at least for the next decade (“The Budget and Economic Outlook : Fiscal Years 2010 to 2020” 21).

While campaigning in 1980’s Ronald Reagan promoted his solution to fixing the economic debt that the United States accumulated over the years. This solution was named “Reaganomics”. The United States was left with a $2.6 trillion dollar debt from President Reagan theory by cutting taxes, and the Federal Revenue would increase because economic activity will increase. President Reagan focused cutting down

Ever since the 1970s, increased government spending has lead to a $17.6 trillion debt. The government can alter this debt by the use of fiscal policy. Politicians are given two ways to do this, either increase taxes or reduce government spending. The Hamilton project proposes 15 different ways to reduce the deficit, which are broken down into four sections; social safety nets, tax reform, new sources of revenue, and establishing a budget for a modern military.

Intro: Eighteen trillion dollars. That is how much the United States is in debt at the time of this writing. Naturally being in debt is not something someone, much less a country, would want. So bringing down the national debt, and eventually eliminate entirely, is the number one priority for many politicians. The question is, how? Some would say that the rich should pay higher taxes, claiming that they are not paying their fair share, while opponents of this declare otherwise, asserting that it would hurt the economy and push the country further into another recession.

The Conservative government doctrine is essentially defined as the party of tax relief. But now conservatives have converted themselves into the party of debt retirement. The conservative government has lost interest in tax cutting and instead wants to devote the surplus tax payments and asset sales over the next 3 years to paying down the national debt. The Howard-Costello government, seen as militant debt hawks, has announced their goal is to retire the entire national debt by 2005.

The National Debt consists of the total debt accrued by local, state and federal. Public debt is essentially the federal debt, thus compiling the staggering number that already exists. The debt deficit to me is astonishing. Currently, the total public debt in the United States, as of December 16, 2015, is $18,788,138,221,346.49. This includes $13,600,726,418,253.26 debt held by the public and $5,187,411,803,093.23 by intergovernmental holdings (usgovermentdebt, 2015). High GPD is not anything new to the United States. The all-time high was 121.70 percent ($18827323.00) in 1946 and a record low of 31.70 ($253400.00) percent in 1974 (United States Government Debt to GDP, 2015). The way we are spending, and the debt we are accruing, it would

Thomas Jefferson once stated, "I place economy among the first and most important virtues, and public debt as the greatest of dangers. To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt" (Bussing-Burks, 7). A lot has changed since Jefferson was President two hundred years ago, but the need to be financially solvent is something that will always be necessary for the United States to maintain its leadership position in the world. The United States of America currently owes $16.7 trillion in debt primarily as a result of the government’s spending practices during the last ten years. Two wars, several fiscal collapses, the bursting of the bubble in the housing market, looming medical care costs from an