Constitution Vs Bill Of Rights Analysis

Possibly the most conversational amendment to every make it’s way through the Senate and the House was the Equal Rights Amendment in 1972. The Equal Rights Amendment was, “introduced through the twenties, thirties, forties, fifties, and sixties without success” (Schneir, 369). Various organizations such as the National Woman’s Party (those who proposed it), National Organization for Women, the Women’s Department of the United Auto Workers, and many other feminists worked most if not all of their lives to pass this specific amendment. In the early 1970’s, the House approved the amendment by a large ratio of 354 to 23. Additionally, in 1972, the Senate also passed the amendment by another shocking ratio of 84 to 8. Unfortunately, the amendment did not pass by its deadline of June 30th, 1982 by only thirty-five states approving it for ratification by at least thirty-eight states (Schneir, 370). There were various reasons why the amendment did not pass, and Miriam Schneir discussed several of these in the section Equal Rights Amendment in the book Feminism in Our Time.

Some Religious activists try to extricate the concept of separation between church and State by claiming that those words do not occur in the Constitution. Indeed they do not, but neither does it exactly say "freedom of religion," yet the First Amendment implies both.

The Bill of Rights came to be applied to state governments through the Fourteenth amendment. Originally the Bill of Rights limited powers to the national government. Many states had their own bill of rights and the fear lied in potential tyranny of the national government and not in the state governments. According to our textbook, for many decades the courts were hesitant on defining civil liberties spelled out in the national bill of rights as constituting “due process” of law under the fourteenth amendment. In 1925 the case of Gitlow v. New York, the Supreme Court ruled that the fourteenth amendment protected the freedom of speech guaranteed under the first amendment. Many protections of the bill of rights were included in the fourteenth

The Bill of Rights lists certain freedoms and liberties that are guaranteed to the people of the United States of America. Because these rights are in the Constitution, they are federal laws that apply to everyone in America. To ensure there was no question as to who the Bill of Rights applied to, the Fourteenth Amendment was passed in 1868 giving anyone born in, or a citizen of, the United States the rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. The amendment left clauses giving some interpretation to the states and other local municipalities. The District of Columbia used one of these clauses to ban all handguns within city limits. The District of Columbia’s ban of handguns was a discrepancy in which the citizens of the city were not able to rightfully exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms. After the law was looked at by the Supreme Court in DC vs. Heller, the court ruled the law was unconstitutional and citizens living in the District of Columbia were being unjustly denied their constitutional rights. After hearing the Supreme Court’s decision in DC vs. Heller, a 76 year old Chicago resident named Otis McDonald looked to remove a City of Chicago ban on handguns which was similar to that in the District of Columbia. Joined by three other Chicago residents, Adam Orlov, and Colleen and David Lawson, McDonald and his colleges filed a suit against the citywide ban of handguns, and eventually became know as McDonald vs. City of Chicago.

he constitution, bill of rights and amendments have changed the way the government and social settings of the United States viewed itself. I learned that the constitution is a document that defines the relationships of the parts of the government and the relationship of the government to its citizen, as well as that the bill of rights being amended to the constitution in order to protect the civil rights and liberties of the citizens and the states, in which the bill of rights will guaranteed a certain level of individual focus on how the government treated its citizens, it assured the safety of the people of the nation. It is very interesting to learn that based on the failures and consequences are what made the Bill of Rights what they are

The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. These first ten amendments were ratified on December 15, 1791. The Bill of Rights define and interpret constitutional rights and protections that are guaranteed under the US Constitution. The following text is a transcription of the first ten amendments to the Constitution in their original form.

The Enlightenment was an eighteenth century scholarly development moved in France that had enduring repercussions all through Europe and America. Addressing conventional teachings and qualities denoted the Enlightenment; there was a prominent propensity towards independence and accentuation on the thoughts of human advance. The American Constitution and the Bill of Rights are both results of the Enlightenment and thoughts of the philosophes, specifically John Locke.

As the founding fathers of the United States began to build the governmental system of the new country they developed new procedures, and used established procedures they were familiar with from the United Kingdom. The Constitution and the Amendments are the basis for the criminal system in this country and the procedures for the courts and the law enforcement community. In this essay, the role of the amendments and the Bill of Rights will be examined as they relate to the court system and the criminal justice system as a whole.

Although the Constitution and Bill of Rights did not pertain to slaves and woman, overall both documents reflect the ideals of the Declaration of independence through the power of the Legislative and Executive Branches, the impartial judicial system, and the freedoms within the First Amendment.

The separation of the state from the church has been present in the constitution ever since it was written. The first amendment relates to a citizens freedom. This freedom does not only allow this practice speech but on thought as well. It states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” (Barton, America: To… p.15). When the constitution was formed society in general belonged to Orthodox Christian. John Quincy Adams, in a speech on July 4,1837 asked the crowd, “Why is it, that next to the birthday of the Savior of the World, your most joyous and venerated festival returns on this day?” He goes on to explain the important ties between the

The Bill of Rights ensures that searches may be warranted without a court ordered search warrant because the search and seizure of property are not unreasonable or done in violation of the defendants’ due process. This case paved the way for police conducted searches without warrants based on the aforementioned grounds that the searches are done within the guidelines of being reasonable and not just for the officer(s) personal gains or dislike of a defendant(s) which makes it a landmark

Separation of Church and State is the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. When James Madison wrote the Constitution he decided to not have god’s name in it. In fact , he didn’t want the government to get involved in any one’s religious believes. However , know in 2015 Separation of Church and State’s biggest issue is Religion. From having “under God” in our pledge of allegiance to being against personal beliefs. Today , the media has made malicious acts that has made the wall between both even longer. In some ways it is better to have a wall , in ways that it benefits both the Church and the State.

The separation of the church and the state has been debated since the birth of this nation. In 1789 when the Constitution was adopted, the separation of church and state issue focused on preventing a government mandated religion (Davis 245). The framers of the Constitution knew first hand the harmful consequences of a government that has complete control over religion. Protecting the religious freedoms of the various religions seeking refuge in America also raised great concern. Each religion s hould be given the same rights when practicing their beliefs. For these reasons, the First Amendment of hte Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution. This amendment denies the government any involvement with religion and allows

Separation of church and state refers to the division of the relationship between religion and government. Various laws apply to different countries around the world about the separation of church and state. Some involve religion so much into their daily lives; it controls how their country is run. In other places, where it is not mandated as much, it becomes a problem in disputing what is and what is not right. The United States of America faces this issue as they struggle deciding what the meaning of what church and state really is. In order to follow the U.S. Constitution, separation of church and state should always be enforced among the people.

The freedom of religion portion of the first amendment is often broken down into two sections; the first is sometimes called the establishment clause, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion…” (1). while the second is sometimes called the free exercise clause.” …or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” (1). The establishment clause describes the idea of separation of church and state; the government will not constrain a doctrine on the people. The writers of the Constitution wished to avoid a government that regulated and controlled people’s religion such as England during the 16th century. Very rightly so! Although some might think a nation that is greatly involved in religion would be a good idea, the worship of God should be up to the individual. Some students