Constitutional Convention Dbq

After the United States declared its independence in 1776, a Congress formed to develop a new stable government and sought to build the very first constitution fulfilling early republican ideals through creating The Articles of Confederation during the midst of the American Revolution. Eventually, this lead into the creation of the Constitution- an accidental yet purposeful replacement - just a mere decade later due to the immense problem-prone regulations and irregular stipulation ranging from economic disorganization to a counterproductive legislative branch. In other words, the beginning of the republican experiment was consequently and truly an utter disaster that caused much discourse to the feeble fragmentation of the newly formed United

Whether or not to ratify the Constitution was one of the greatest controversies in American history. This constitution set the framework for a new stronger government unlike the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was known as America’s first ‘weak’ government. These Articles were passed to provide authority to the Continental Congress on a legal basis. Even though, they had already been exercising this power, they wanted something so they wouldn’t be questioned when regulating trade and creating taxes.

On December 5, 1936, the Soviet Union adopted a new constitution to reform the government. It replaced the 1924 constitution that was ratified shortly after the death of Vladimir Lenin. The 1936 constitution lasted until 1977, when a new constitution was adopted. According to a former kulak named Andrei Arzhilovsky, people celebrated on the streets when the constitution was ratified, and everyone called it the “Stalin Constitution”. Rightfully so, it deserved the name because Josef Stalin was heavily involved in the creation of the new constitution. Indeed there were good reasons for Soviet citizens to celebrate the adoption of the new constitution, because it granted rights that were previously denied to the people. Among the rights that were provided were: (1) universal rights for all Soviet citizens including kulaks (2) freedom of religion (3) preservation of the rights of all ethnic groups. In this paper, I will argue that the 1936 Soviet Constitution did not achieve its goal of providing universal rights to all Soviet citizens,

If something great enters the lives of others, it’s usually something that happened for the better, such as the Ratification of the United States. Multiple concerns of the founding fathers arose throughout the duration of the Ratification. However, during the 18th century, the nation was divided between policies and acts, opposing the views of the Federalists, who wanted a strong central government; created for a goal to spread unity with support toppling in from the North, vs. the Anti-Federalists who believed in a weak, central government with support filing in through the Southern colonies and colonists. Although there was a multitude of problems that were being faced at the time, like the outcome of the future of their homeland, due to the constant warfare between the colonies involving the Articles of Confederation and the unorganized Louisiana Purchase, along with certain social, political, and economic concerns, displayed through the Land Ordinance of 1785- A law that divided much of the United States into a system of townships to facilitate the sale of land to settlers and raise money, and the Bank of the United States being chartered by Alexander

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was held to address the many problems about the way the United States was governing its people, which was operated under the Articles of Confederation. Among the 55 delegates were 13 colonies who attended the convention to address the many issues that the United States of America were facing. The delegates consisted of wealthy Federalists who fought a strong central government and favored ratifying the Constitution. The Anti-Federalist were less fortunate and feared losing their power to the national government. In this essay, I will be discussing why the Constitution was created, what major arguments arose, and the debates over ratifying the constitution.

On May 29, 1790, the American Constitution was ratified. According to constitutionality.info, the main purpose for this constitution was to accomplish two things, form a federal government and delegate certain powers to this government. The Constitution exists today mainly due to the failure of the Articles of Confederation. According to usconstitution.net, the Articles of Confederation failed due to some major faults.

Description: This is the United States Constitution, the founding document of the United States. It established the three branches of government and the powers given to each. It basically set forth the structure necessary to run the country. It was written in 1787, ratified in 1788. It has and is still used everyday in the United States of America.

2. If you had been alive in 1787 would you have supported the ratification of the Constitution or not? Explain why. If I had been alive in 1787, I would have supported the ratification of the US constitution. During this era in our country had just won the American Revolution and was looking for a great change to happen. The constitution gave citizens fundamental law for the government, without these laws there would be complete and utter chaos.

In September 1786, Virginia called a conference in Annapolis, Maryland to discuss ways to facilitate commerce and establish standard regulations throughout the states. Only 5 of the 13 states sent delegates, so they decided to meet again the following summer to amend the Articles of Confederation.

Constitution was not an easy one, especially since the Anti-Federalist opposed it. The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution would lead to tyranny because it was written by people in the highest social class, commonly known as aristocrats. They knew the Constitution included nothing about certain freedoms of the people and they wanted that sense of security. According to American Government and Politics Today, “They [Anti-Federalists] wanted to include a list of guaranteed liberties, or a bill of rights” (Bardes, Shelley, and Schmidt, 1985, p. 47). In effect, James Madison began to draft what is known today as the Bill of

During the ratification of the Constitution, there were major debates surrounding it, where people had to argue against one another on a certain subject, and then compromise of how each law should be set out for the states. One of the major debates was during The Federalist Papers, where the anti-federalist did not want to continue with the constitution, because in their opinion, it would place in more power in the central government, as a result will be corrupted. The Federalist however wanted to continue on with the original constitution. This led to few parts of the states to be separated on the majority of federalist and anti-federalists. However, this led to the Constitution could not be completed and as a result in 1861, to start a civil

The ratification of the Constitution was a crucial and momentous turning point in the history of American government. Although this renowned document created much more structure within the national government than it did under the Articles of Confederation, North Carolina was extremely against the ratification of the Constitution. With a strong majority of Anti-Federalist delegates during the debate throughout the ratification convention, North Carolina was called into session twice, in Hillsborough and Fayetteville, where the Anti-Federalists fought diligently for an explicit Bill of Rights to protect individual rights and maintain state economic stability, while the Federalists attempted to assuage the Anti-Federalists’ refusal to accept

The Constitution wasn’t fair and was poorly made so they had to create a new one. The Congress started off by adding improvements but it needed too many improvements they had to start over. If they hadn't started over the Constitution Would not have been as good, and there would still be poorly written parts. The new constitution was called the Constitutional Convention. People complained that their Liberty was being taken away and they wanted it back the Congress thought about the complaints and decide to consider revising the Constitution. The revising turned into the Constitutional Convention.

In May 1787, the Founding Fathers, who were made up of 55 delegates from one of the 13 states besides Rhode Island, met in Philadelphia for what would come to be called the Constitutional Convention [BRE]. When they met they intended to fix the consitution that was already in place, which was called the Articles of Confederation. This document had many weaknesses which ultimatly led to its downfall: it only had a legislative branch, so it could not hold trials or enforce laws, it could not raise taxes (it was able to raise money, however to do this the legislative branch had to ask the states for funds), it could not draft an army, so the federal government would have to use state militia, it could not control interstate or foreign commmerce,

The last half of the 18th century was very important for the United States. During this era, the nation was founded following the Declaration of Independence and drafting and ratification of the Constitution a decade later. The 1787 constitutional convention and ratification debate was very important in the making of the US Constitution. The dynamics, antagonism, considerations, process and the eventual consensus regarding the Constitution can be explained by discrete theories in political discourses. However, there are theories that fit best within this historical context and help better explain the process of the constitutional convention and ratification. This paper will talk about pluralist theory as a theoretical perspective that best explains the workings of the 1787 constitutional convention and ratification debate, as opposed to power elite theory. This will be achieved by looking at the premises of pluralist theoretical perspective, and the workings of the 1787 constitutional convention and ratification and then show how pluralist theory best captures the workings.