preview

Constitutional Law II Final Exam

Good Essays

Constitutional Law II Final Exam
Dr. Barsha Pickell, Spring 2015
Ana Martin
1. For over forty-five years the Supreme Court has struggled with what Justice Harlan called “the intractable obscenity problem.” From the Roth decision in 1957 declaring obscenity to be unprotected by the First Amendment, to the current debate over the regulation of obscenity on the Internet, the issue of obscenity has frustrated and divided the Court. Discuss the evolution of the Court’s “standard” on obscenity from Butler v. Michigan to Miller v. California. What issues have arisen in the application of the Miller test to electronic expression? How has the Supreme Court addressed those issues in recent cases? Are you satisfied with the Miller test and the way in which it has been applied? Why or why not?
2. decision in Roe v. Wade and discuss the successes and failures of subsequent attempts to limit a woman’s right to choose an abortion. What alternatives to Roe’s strict scrutiny standard have been offered and to what level of success?
I. Grounds for the decision
The ruling of Roe v. Wade is perhaps one of the most emotionally-charged and controversial in constitutional jurisprudence. Through its ruling, abortion was found to be a constitutionally protected right and was, therefore, legalized throughout the United States. To come to this conclusion, the justices of the Warren Court (ruling 7-2) drew from precedents such Griswold v. Connecticut that arguably implied the existence of a

Get Access