Construct Related Evidence

Understanding the term construct, is important as an writer. Construct, which are “...unquestioned claims that can be questioned, contested, redefined, or reinvented,” (Wardle, Downs 2011, 888) , a definition

In the science of Psychology, observations and inferences are equally important. Observation is the act of perceiving, of noticing, of watching something closely. On the other hand, inference is looking at the evidence in front of you and making a deduction of your own based on what you see. When somebody observes something or someone they just state the facts as they appear before their eyes, whereas in inference they reach a conclusion by assuming or deducting things as well. For example, an observation would be “

Describe the different categories of evidence Apess uses to expose the racism toward Indians. What category of evidence do you find most persuasive, and why?

From our readings in chapter two of Avant and Walker (2011), it is very apparent that research affects the application of theory more than ever. With the increased focus on quality and the use of evidence based practice (EBP) to obtain the best outcomes at a low cost, research has come to the forefront of all health care providers, including nurses. This is evident in the current movement toward patient-centered care payment initiatives such as Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and Bundle Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) being employed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). These are two main focus areas of my daily work as a clinical consultant.

In recent years, the proliferation of the popularity of crime investigation shows have risen concerns regarding the fairness of our criminal justice system. The increased use of the courtroom as the setting of drama by the media and the consistent narration employed to dramatize the show has blurred reality from fiction for the everyday citizens. Now that crime shows are so popular, CSI being the most watched TV show in the world with 69 million regular viewers worldwide; many lawyers, judges and other trained professionals are concerned that this increased exposure to unrealistic content regarding the law have given jurors an unrealistic expectation of evidence presented in court. That this has been the basis of jurors unfairly freeing

Wow, after sweeping the kitchen floor I realized my children must improve on their chore duties. The trace evidence that I collected was dog hair; a tiny piece of cedar chip, dirt, sand, coffee grinds and crumbs. Also the invisible evidence that we cannot see that was tracked into the house such as bacteria and toxin (Breyer, 2015). Before I entered the crime scene I would first place the protective covers on my shoes and then the gloves so I would not contaminate the crime scene. The obvious pieces of evidence would be collected using tweezers and then individually package the item and write on the label my name, the date, the description and the exhibit number. After the visible evidence was retrieved I would then use the filtered vacuum

I understand what you are saying above working with those who are opposed to change. I think like you do as well, that that having current evidence-based protocols are so important and can help save lives. In an article by Roger Ulrich (Ulrich et al., 2008) they look at the scientific research on evidence-based healthcare designs and protocols and their implications when used for designing better and safer hospitals. The report builds on literature reviews conducted by researchers in 2004 and finds that not only protocols and practices buts knowledge of evidence-based hospital designs are critical in making hospitals safer and more healing for patients and better places for staff to work especially with respect to reducing the frequency

In order to prove a offender guilty in court police often use forensic evidence as proof instead of others such as testimonies, direct evidence, and circumstantial evidence because it is the most reliable and important type of evidence as stated in “Forensic: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell.

Chapter one is based on critical thinking when it comes to learning psychology. Critical thinking is the ability and willingness to assess claims and make objective judgments on the basis of well-supported reasons. It is the ability to look for flaws in arguments and resist claims that have no supporting evidence. First this is asking questions because if their is something that u dont understand its always good to ask quetions so you wont be left puzzled. Defining the problem , examine the evidence ask yourself what evidence supports you argments. Accuracy is unquestionably essential to critical thinking. Relevance means that the information and ideas discussed must be logically relevant to the issue being discussed. Consistency is a key

The three standards of evidence are preponderance of evidence, clear and convincing evidence, and beyond a reasonable doubt. In the Cruzan case the court stated that they did not have convincing evidence of Nancy’s wishes because she did not have a living will. In the Cruzan case they only had Preponderance of evidence when they first decided they wanted to disconnect Nancy’s feeding tube. Preponderance of evidence means that there is more evidence one way than the other. Preponderance of evidence differs from the first two evidences because you need little to no evidence to win a case.

I Think that the first point about the college professor's suggestion to the FBI supported by the 2 other incidents where suspects were found guilty should be weak evidence. In fact, it provides perspective and with or even knew these men. The second point about the FBI profiling of Mr. jewel and the idea that he was positioning himself for a promotion is indeed medium evidence because it points to a more solid motive.

Suppose you are taking an ecology course in college. The instructor asks you to investigate the question "Why do some frogs in Minnesota have deformed or missing limbs or tails? He expects you to use scientific methods for your research.

Impression evidence is where several objects are pressed or stamped together allowing the objects to transfer and retain characteristics from one another. Pattern evidence is additional identifiable information found within a piece of impression evidence. Many times investigators will find fingerprints, shoe prints, or marks of a bullet at a crime scene. Evidence such as this is fairly easy to identify. Many times crime scene investigators can walk on to a crime scene and spot them easily.

In the contemporary world that we are overwhelmed by (background), there is a growing concern that (topic) rather than (Opposite view point). ( Supporting Ideas). In this essay, all arguments of this contentious issue will be put under scrutiny prior to reaching an informed conclusion.

This article discusses the different methods and thing that an investigator must do before beginning to examiner the scene of the crime. He explains in detail how to take notes of everything you see in detail to prevent any destruction of important and fragile evidence such as shoeprints, trace evidence, etc. Also, explains where an investigator must begin its evidence compilation and where it must finish. It is very important to follow step by step certain types of rules as collect such evidence and when. Each possible evidence must be marked with a marker to prevent someone accidentally destroy it until it is recorded on camera or photographed. It also tells how to gather traces using the oblique lighting technique which is possible to discover