Constructive Criticism

Lastly, self-evaluation is a key component to writing an effective essay. Even though I was able to have student feedback for my essays; self-evaluation is important for me to be able to determine my strengths and weaknesses in my writing. After composing each essay I was required to compose a self-evaluation. The evaluations describe what I consider the strong points in the essay, and were I felt I still needed to

It is common to miss your own mistakes or critical information. When I read somebodies stuff, I can pick out different flaws than I can pick out on my own. There were times when I would forget to add something to an essay or a story that were critical and because I knew it, I forgot to make it known to the reader. Many people do the same thing while being unaware they are doing it. It is also helpful because your peers can ask you questions about your piece that can help you improve your knowledge, insight, and writing. While peer evaluations are a great revision strategy, it should not be your only revision

Peer editing has helped me become a stronger and more fluid writer this semester. I’ve never actually done peer editing within a familiar group before every paper, so having a specific day to read and comment on one another’s writing in detail has truly helped me formulate better essays overall. It has helped me not only to see small mistakes I’ve made, but how the reader or audience interprets my work. Aside from peer editing inside the classroom I’ve taken my papers to the writing center and you for advice and help. I think that through the use of these sources it has helped me to develop stronger claims, better fluidity, and coherency. By formulating ideal structures, engaging in peer editing, and creating reflection pieces, they have helped me generate overall better papers.

After a review I might sit right down to browse over their comments and use it to boost my essay. Enhancements embrace adding data or fixing descriptive linguistics mistakes. For instance, In the second paper, most of the peer comments were about adding citations from the original story, which helps clarify the idea and simplify it for the audience. Really after the implementation of the request and took their advice, increased the degree obtained. In return, I reviewed my colleagues' papers and wrote my notes to them on correcting some spelling errors, adding some ideas or adding some details to clarify their

What frightens me about a class that includes peer reviewing is not me reviewing others’ papers, but rather, their reviews of me. Because of this, I did not try to be too strict or too easy, and I tried to guide to guide my fellow peers along with questions instead of telling them a certain way would be better. At the beginning of my process in reviewing my peers’ papers, I decided it would be helpful to point out mostly grammar mistakes and syntax. For example, in John Silva’s essay, “A Fool with Good Intentions,” most of my focus was on correcting grammar although I briefly mentioned structure and meaning suggestions. The main criticism I had was that:

Moreover, I found in-class peer review very helpful during the revision process. For example, I was very unclear on my AP solution part, but after one on one in class peer review, I received many helpful comments from my peers on how I can develop my points. Below is a picture of my in-class peer review comment and how I revised. This is a picture of my AP draft 2. In this draft, I was still struggling on how to elaborate more on my solution and I was not sure about if my claim was strong enough. However, after having a face to face conversation with my peer, I was able to discuss any concerns I had.

I simply wrote one draft without using any feedback from adults or peers. If I decided to use feedback on my piece, I know it would have been more beneficial to my development as a writer. On this piece I earned an 85%, in which I wasn’t satisfied with. From this, I was allowed to revise my piece, allowing me to go in depth into my writing to earn a better grade. Also, before submitting my revised essay, I asked my mom to read over my work to see if it would raise my grade. She gave me a few valuable pieces of advice that helped raise the grade on my essay to a 90%. From the Thematic Unit, I learned to improve my writing process to prepare myself for the future. At the end of the year, I was told to write my own essay about William Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night novel, using my own writing process to be successful. My effective writing process included writing a first draft and completing self-assessment afterwards. The first step of my process helped me understand how my writing could develop into a stronger piece. After self-assessment, I wrote a second draft and had a peer review my work. Finally, I made a third and final draft in order to present the best version of my writing. As shown from the Soliloquy Essay, my writing process is

I recently began working at a new job as a medical assistant in a cardiology office. With my background in cardiology being limited to that which I learned in my undergraduate courses I am constantly learning new information and skills. Consequently, I am occasionally corrected in the tasks I perform. The most recent piece of constructive criticism I received at this clinic was regarding proper placement of EKG leads. My original placements of the leads were not entirely incorrect, yet the MA whom I was shadowing adjusted them within one centimeter. I was not insulted by this correction, but rather intrigued as to her reasoning for the adjustment. Of course, precision of EKG lead placement on patients in a cardiovascular clinic is crucial,

Constructive feedback should build relationships between colleagues, improve unwanted behaviour and praise good behaviour. To give constructive feedback you must set a goal on what you want to achieve after the feedback is given, it must have a clear purpose and be mutually agreed by each person. You then must choose the right time to deliver this feedback whether it is in private or it needs to be addressed as a team. To give feedback you must give specific examples of what behaviour needs changing and base it on the actual actions of the worker rather than the person themselves as they may take offence to this and refuse to listen to the feedback you give anyway, another way to avoid this is to balance positive and negative points. After

I believed it helped me so much through this course with all these feedbacks and comments that students and Professor Roth provided me. Likewise, my opinion, I prefer to work with team/group rather than working by myself because that’s where the point I need help with my essay. Being peer reviewed by others assisted me why I have improper grammar and poor writing structure. I chose to find a method to improve it because if it wasn’t for my peer groups, then I would never know the mistake I have been doing along. Moreover, doing collaborative group work does not just help you but improving your writing skills and understanding the fact why it is wrong. Overall, if I kept on doing peer reviewing, I would most likely to be a better writer unlikely back

I really do not have that much experience with peer review. The only time that I participated in peer review was high school senior English and English 101. And both classes really never focused or appreciated peer reviewing. With that being said, I really do not know how peer review works and how to make it successful. I have only ever traded my paper with good friends and have them tell me “it looks good.” Being that the past peer reviewing hasn’t been very successful hopefully I’ll learn to respect and find success in this writing process.

Even though I’ve already had my opinion on the topic and written the first draft, evaluating and commenting on the draft helped me see all the errors I’ve made in the essay so far. Since I tried my best on the graphic organizer in order to finish the first draft quickly, the first draft was done poorly, with many errors in sentences, lack of transitions, and analysis that seemed insufficient to me. The self-assessment helped me see mistakes in the essay, along with the need to correct those mistakes to do the next step, the second draft. After fixing and adding on to the essay, the second draft was completed, which was then reviewed on by peers inside and outside the classroom. First, the second draft was judged by six people within the classroom, after the paper was reviewed and commented on by others, their opinions and judgement helped me see new insight onto my essay, as they read and critiqued on my writing, their opinions had me consider whether or not it will change the outcome of my writing. When the task sheet activity was finished, we were assigned writing groups, helping me further identify

Different perspectives and a fresh set of eyes reading through my essays was the one of the major keys of developing my writing. For peer review, I was able to get feedback from two different groups – classmates

The peer editing is to correct your paper from person who is in the same age or level and write their opinion about it. That can help you to have other view from someone’s in your level. It was my first editing experience. I learned about something new in writing skills, which is how to edit other paper, and how to give them your opinion. Also, when I see other person paper, it helps me to think widely and gain more ideas about how to be a good writer also whom I can read my paper as critic to it. Moreover, it helps me to think correctly to give right advice to other person. Editing peer gives me chance to participate with classmate how she thought. Moreover, it was as a practice to my grammar when I correct my partner paper. I edited two papers

This essay question would be a favorable and constructive prompt for many reasons. For example, this instance of humans interacting with their environment would make an interesting point because it not only examines the way in which the environment and location of a civilization impacts society, but also how these circumstances play an important role in how the people interact with each other as well. This matter would provide a valuable opening to delve into the individual aspects of how this was prevalent in each society as well as the parallels and contrasts among the respective civilizations. Also, because of the variation in time periods and locations of the three civilizations listed, there are many deviations among the societies although