Constructivism Essay

1064 Words5 Pages
Though constructivists believe that reality is based upon our own individual perceptions and thoughts, Delia’s constructivism theory is more objective. Within the objective approach, Delia’s theory falls primarily under the socio-psychological tradition, but dabbles in the rhetorical tradition of Griffins survey map. A socio- psychological scholar “believes that there are communication truths that can be discovered by careful, systematic observation”(Griffin, 2009, p, 42). It also displays a cause-and-effect relationship that will predict successful and unsuccessful communication (Griffin 2009). In other words, truth can be revealed through experimentation and surveys. This is relevant throughout all of Delia’s research as he used…show more content…
Therefore, by using the RCQ Delia is able to predict how credible an individual’s will distinguish his or her character to be. Furthermore, Delia’s constructivism theory also falls under the Rhetorical tradition. Rhetoric is defined as the art of persuasion through the use of argument, organization of ideas, language use, and delivery in public speaking (Griffin 2009). This interpretive rhetorical qualities are some what distinguished Delia’s belief that cognitively complex individuals will be able to asses a goal, plan a way of accomplish the intended goal, and enact on his or her previously distinguished plan. By relating constructivism to rhetoric, one is able to see how constructivism is only more objective and not completely objective, because constructivists are “interested in how individuals perceive the world and how they use a system known as personal constructs to view others and to make sense of their perceptions and experiences”(Hunt 2010, p. 269). The scientific approach of epistemology is that truth can be discovered. According to Griffin (2009), epistemology is “The study of the origin, nature, method, and limits of knowledge” (p. 16). The critical approaches taken by Delia reflect the epistemology of his theory; one which is represented through their philosophy of science of observation. He declines the interpretive approach that suggests finding answers through ethnography, textual analysis (Griffin 2009), and uses the empirical
Open Document