Contemporary Scientific Progression And Discourses

The level of technology that concerns the health of people in the United States has grown dramatically in the last twenty years. With this new wave of advanced technology numerous controversies have risen up into the public eye. At the top of this list, in health technology is the materials and methods used in keeping humans alive. There are many different viewpoints on how far technology should be allowed to go. Technology cannot effect the patient’s way of life.

In an ever evolving society, the increased use of technology has become a staple in our day to day lives. With the constant advancements of technology the ideology of cloning has now become a reality. The increasing use of science today is slowly leading to the development of cloning and genetic selection. By altering the genetic make-up of a being, scientists have brought about several questions on how the population would adjust to the “super-beings,” and what benefits and consequences both human and non-humans would gain with their creations? Authors Francis Fukuyama, who wrote “Human Dignity,” and The Dalai Lama, writer of “Ethics and the New Genetics,” has called into question the use of cloning and how it could possibly affect others. With the creation of “super-beings,” humans would ultimately suffer a bigger separation from each other and create unfairness among the human species such as a stronger and more intelligent being.

D’Souza also disagrees with Silver stating that “problem arises when people seek to use enhancement technologies to shape the destiny of others, and especially their children.” This represents a fundamental attack on the value of human life and the core principal of America. (821)

Humans are on a constant quest in the search for perfection and advancement in all areas of life through progressive scientific knowledge. From such a stance, the future of humans appears boundless with all the potential possibilities biotechnology provides, but such developments will cause ethical, social and biological implications.

Medical technology is advancing at a rapid rate. For example, a very common procedure is an endoscopy and colonoscopy which checks for bowel and stomach cancers and some other conditions. New technology is being trialed at the moment, instead of a patient going under an anesthetic and having to have a special diet and bowel preparation prior to the procedure, this will now be done by taking a capsule in a tablet like form where the patient will swallow the capsule that contains a tiny camera and batteries and then be later eliminated by the patients natural bowel movements. This is swallowed by the patient and will travel through the gastro intestinal system, taking

The evolution of technology has been hand in hand with the human subjugation of earth, but the question persists, when does the use of technology go too far? Advances in medical science have increased the average human lifespan and improved the quality of life for individuals. Medical science and biology are steadily arriving at new ways to alter humans by the use of advanced genetic alteration. This technology gives rise to the question of how this new technology ought to be used, if at all. The idea of human enhancement is a very general topic, since humans are constantly “enhancing” themselves through the use of tools. In referring to human enhancement, I am referring specifically to the use of genetic intervention prior to

To examine this possibility, Garreau interviewed Nick Bostrom, co-founder of the World Transhumanist Association. Bostrom shows his agreement with human transcendence by asserting that “Technological progress makes it harder for people to ignore the fact that we might actually change the human nature” (qtd. in Garreau, 242).

Transhumanism is the idea that the advancement of technology will better the human species into a more advanced social and political existence, or literally meaning beyond human. There are many ways that transhumanism can be achieved throughout the next thirty years, some of these being medical modifications to the human body, how the human body reacts to the aging process, and those who are included to have basic human rights. Although transhumanism may give the human species certain advantages in their social and political lives, they risk their dignity, and uniqueness.

There have been inventions that have given hope and inspiration to others. Everyone values medicine and the technology that we currently have. But how far is too far? Medical technology is very economically risky and those that can’t afford it may struggle. Do you think this technology should be open to anyone, whether they are rich or poor? “We have shown through research that providing additional support to vulnerable patients and to their physicians, to provide education, support, and address the unique barriers they face, we can provide all patients the best care and best hope for a cure.” (Freund, 2015). Karen Freund is also one of the research professors that has a lot of experience as well as her interest in

Millions suffer from preventable causes, yet billions of dollars go towards enhancing technologies for consumers of the developed world. It is unfair to continue to let the poor and disadvantaged suffer while working toward further increasing the quality of life of relatively wealthy consumers. Furthermore, the point is made in the documentary that technologies used to bring people up to par with the rest of society are used to bring people above what is normal. This is to say that a technology such as a robotic limb developed to help someone walk, will, by virtue of humanity, be further developed to make someone run faster or jump higher than the rest of society. After medical necessity is met, the alteration becomes a luxury. In observing the nature of how humans handle medical advancements and biotechnology, the argument for justice not being met by the trans-humanist perspective is coherent. Thus, the trans-humanist perspective cannot be said to be ethical by principilist

Without the sense of mutual obligation, the divide between enhanced humans and normal humans will grow dangerously wide. In Sandel’s opinion, human dignity is defined by the constant drive to achieve perfection.

The biotechnology revolution will change the face of the planet, Introduction page 1, There are two thousand laboratories in america alone five hundred companies spending five billion dollars on the biotechnology. Among the scientist there are no surveillance to make sure they are doing the right thing with the technology they are creating. Page 2 of intro, International Genetic technologies, inc did secret research when an accident occured twelve people or fewer where there to witness the accident and only a handful survived. “Biotechnology will transform every part of human life from our food to our medical care our entertainment and our very bodies.” Biotechnology will be something that will either kill us or help us how we use it will depend.

The improvement of medicine over the course of the human successes gave great convenience to the people of today. Science has cured and prevented many illnesses from occurring and is on its way to cure some of the most dreadful and harmful illnesses. As the world modernizes due to the industrialization, so does the ways of medicine. Some cures are approached by chance, some, through intense, scientific measures.

In Ronald Bailey’s article “Transhumanism: The Most Dangerous Idea? Why Striving to Be More Human Is Human”, Bailey poses an underlying question about which ideas, if embraced, would pose the greatest threat to the welfare of humanity? In particular, Bailey posed the question to 8 of the most prominent policy intellectuals editors of the “foreign policy” from the September and October issue. Of the 8 editors, the answer that caught Bailey’s attention the most was that of editor Francis Fukuyama. Fukuyama proposed in his Foreign “Policy article”, that the world’s most dangerous idea was that of Transhumanism.

“Our capacity to see ourselves as sharing a common fate… if bioengineering made the myth of the ‘self-made man’ come true, it would be difficult to view our talents as gifts for which we are indebted rather than achievements for which we are responsible.” (Saletan) Biologically removing the flaws from man shows how desperate we have become in perfecting society. We are taking the easy path towards perfection through technology instead of actually finding the causes of this flawed society. Through all of this development toward excellence and turning a blind eye to everything else around them, man has allowed itself to develop a massive flaw,