Contrastive Rhetoric : The Way Of Effective Speaking And Writing

Rhetorical strategies are techniques writers use for a particular effect. In previous classes, you might have been introduced to them as “literary devices” – others will be completely new to you. When thinking of language choices that we make when writing or speaking, think of it like this -- everyone draws from a “toolbox” of rhetorical strategies as they express ideas and evoke responses in their readers. The more “tricks” of language that you know, the more effectively you can say what you want in the most effective way.

Rhetoric seems like a big word but the meaning is simple- persuasion. In the book Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus, two major characters, are fantastic at persuading the Roman citizens. When one is reading the story, they might think that both have equal amounts but when you look closer, Antony has the better rhetoric strategies. In just a few short sentences, Antony convinced the people to believe that Caesar needed revenge even though he never came out and told them that. Just a couple of minutes ago, the citizens were on Brutus’s side and thought that Caesar needed to go.

“rhetorical discourse comes into existence as a response to a situation…the situation controls the rhetorical response…rhetoric is a mode of altering reality…by the creation of discourse which changes reality through the mediation of thought and action…Let us regard rhetorical situation as a natural context of persons, events, objects, relations, and an exigence which strongly invites utterance” (Philosophy & Rhetoric, Volume 1, 1 –

ENC Major Project 1 Rough Draft JF Jacquelin Fleming Tue 9/15/2015 12:00 AM Inbox; Sent Items To: Jacquelin Fleming; When you think of literature, reading and writing is usually what comes to mind.

Rhetoric gives you an avenue to tell a story from your perspective in a way that connects with the intended audience without having to be one hundred percent substantiated. This writing style is evident in almost everything we read from billboards to Internet ads and even political speeches.

I don’t consider myself a gifted writer by any stretch, but with practice I myself have noticed improvements in my own writing. When not writing essays for classes, my time spent writing dwindles down to mere text messages, emails, and tweets. However, since beginning this class, I noticed that I am no paying more attention to rhetorical strategy in my own and others writings. When I write for a topic now I take take a moment to identify all the rhetorical strategies I am employing and what I can do to maximize the potential to improve my argument.

What is rhetoric? Rhetoric is a convincing or persuasive way of talking or writing. There are three main elements of rhetoric: logos, ethos, and pathos. Each one of these helps you make the argument that you need to make. All three of these uses something to make an argument with such as logos uses logic, ethos uses ethics or image, and pathos uses emotions.

Writers are able to utilize rhetorical devices in order to express thoughts/ideas/themes/messages in subtle and artistic

How does Wood define rhetoric? Wood defines rhetoric as situations that motivate issues and arguments. Analyzing rhetorical situation is an important critical reading strategy that can be used as a tool for analysis throughout the reading process. Moreover, rhetorical situation is a potent critical thinking strategy that can help the writer plan and write a better argument.

Rhetoric is a course in which students are taught the values of persuasion. And yet, behind this course is the utmost power to corrupt the world, changing it into a world of our own policies. This power, even though seldom discussed, has lead to many intriguing discoveries. One such discovery is how people are able to shape the world they live in simply by choosing the right words. Therefore those who would want the world to be a better place must protect this power. If in the wrong hands this power could cause serious damage. Several authors have striven to protect rhetoric and its power. Few agree on the matter of defining rhetoric, but they know that they must protect rhetoric from dark souls. A single definition of rhetoric must maintain a simplistic nature while incorporating every aspect of rhetoric. However, I argue that rhetoric is a means of persuading audiences of a situation and a particular reality through language and personal appeal. In order to prove this definition I will discuss how rhetoric creates a situation, the shaping of a different reality, the audience, the use of language, and the personal appeal. Finally, I will demonstrate the absolute need for rhetoric.

Rhetoric language is used to achieve a purpose, or to get a point across so that it is completely understood. Constitutes of the situation consists of an exigence, rhetor, audience, and constraint. While the audience and the rhetor are very important in a rhetorical situation because they are the people involved in the discourse; the more important parts of a rhetorical situation are the way either constraints or exigence are used to get your point across. These are the main strategies used to achieve your purpose. Exigence and constraints both move the discussion; they are usually the main focus in the situation.

Rhetoric is the study of how writers and speakers use words to influence an audience. There are many different pieces to rhetoric, like diction, syntax, and mood. Diction is the choice of words, syntax is the way the words are arranged,

Consequently, the more practice, the better we get. As myself as a multilingual writer, I’m struggling a lot from the beginning how to write an academic paper. However, I spend most of my time to write and how to make it to become stronger and an effective paper. With those hours and effort, I believe that my paper will turn out the quality that I wanted. Today, I will introduce to the bilingual writer the new way to write our paper. It is called rhetoric. So what is rhetoric and why it is important to our writing? Rhetoric is the art of using language effectively and persuasively. The rhetoric contains five parts in the writing, which are audience, purpose, persona, context and rhetorical choices. When we using the rhetoric in our writing, we need to made the reader feel that we know what we need to write and how to write rhetorical awareness is important for multilingual writer, because it’s allow us to learn and demonstrate what we understand into our writing.

The subject of this course is rhetoric, the effective use of language. Basically, rhetoric is about people communicating to other people who have an investment in the same issue or topic. This course introduces students to college-level writing and analysis. That means you can expect to develop critical writing strategies that should help you succeed in college. The focus of this course, however, is not only "college writing"; we will also address the kinds of writing and reading skills that are important in the world beyond college. Therefore, this course has a simple goal: to help you to become "critical citizens" inside and outside the university.

The first aspect of my writing to improve was my ability to specify and identify rhetoric. In my Comparison between “Live like weasels” and “Self Reliance” I was Identifying emotions accurately but I was not explaining how I came to that conclusion. When I was attempting to describe the tone of “Live like Weasels” I described it as “sounds very lost and regretful about how complicated the world is” rather than using the proper rhetorical term, tone. Recently, I have improved my ability to identify and specify rhetoric. In the article “The Singer solution to world poverty” I specifically identified the rhetoric being used in the line “Looking farther down the track, he sees the small figure of a child very likely to be killed by the runaway train. He can't stop the train and the child is too far away to warn of the danger, but he can throw a switch that will divert the train down the siding where his Bugatti is parked.” Rather than describing this as simply pathos, I identified the rhetoric more specifically as horror; also, rather than describing it a logos I specifically identified it as a