Human experimentation has been a practice for hundreds of years. Human experimentation is, “subjecting live human beings to science experiments that are sometimes cruel, sometimes painful, sometimes deadly and always a risk” (Human Medical). Humans have been test subjects for vaccines, medication, and procedure for doctors across the world. They have been used with or without their consent through various ways of testing and studies and have been taken advantage of during the entire process. Obviously, by testing humans, it is easier to see what will happen to other human patients than if scientist tested in a lab on an animal. Testing on the same species as the intended recipient is important because every animal has a different body composition …show more content…
One of the main arguments/problems with human experimentation is regarding consent. Consent, or giving one permission, is an important part of signing up for experimentation but it has been avoided many times throughout history. Doctors and scientists have taken advantage of uneducated people and convinced them to participate in potentially life threatening studies. They use money and wordiness to mask the true danger of the experiment in some cases to find test subjects for controversial tests. Similarly, minorities or groups that are discriminated against also fall into this category of people who are subject to be chosen as test subjects. The Aversion Project occurred in South Africa where about 900 homosexual soldiers were sent to Ward 22 and experienced shock treatment and other horrendous treatment meant to cure them of their “Homosexual condition”(10 of the Most). Another issue it the potential loss for a human life. Not that killing an animal is right but, putting a person’s life on the line is much more important and should not be taken lightly. With this being said, instances still occur where people are taken advantage of, discriminated against, and essentially forced into experiments instead of testing animals or with people that give true informed consent. Human experimentation leads to poor conditions, discrimination, and death when consent fails to be
What would you do if you saw someone slowly torching an animal to death. The background of animal testing is defined as some say it is cruel and some say it is necessary. In recent discussions of animal being used as test subjects. On one hand, some argue that it is cruel and inhuman. On the other hand, some say the test could not be performed without the animals. My own view is, I strongly am against animals being used as test subjects. Some view the test that are performed on the animals as innocent and harmless, it is clear that the test are cruel because the test torture the animals, and some test are inhuman.
From when you are a baby to when you are an adult animal testing is used in your everyday products. From the Pampers you put on as a baby and the Johnson and Johnson you are washed with. To when you are older the Febreeze, Sunsilk, and Gillette you use.( Companies That do Test on Animals) Animal testing surrounds you in every act of life. “The guess is around 100 million animals are used worldwide in animal testing.” (Animal Rights) Animal testing is rooted from natural curiosity. How the insides of a living organism operate and look is an interesting idea. Because of the fact that dissection of humans was illegal by the Roman Church, animals were the second best option for knowledge of living organisms. (Animal Testing) The debate
Many people often oversee the effects of animal testing. This has been going on for decades and many are unaware of the results and the damages animal testing can cause. Animals undergo a lot of stress and pain when they are put through experimentations. Many have debated that it is unethical to test on animals while others say it helps to protect the safety of humans. In my opinion, animal testing is cruel and should be made illegal. Their lives are just as important as human lives and should not be treated as experimental animals. The system of an animal differs from the human system, therefore even if a tested product did not harm the animal, it may or may not be harmful to humans. Hence, our body system reactions differ from the bodies of an animal. It has been scientifically proven that 90% of the animals being tested in labs results in death while only a handful of animal experiments are successful. There are multiple alternative methods rather than forcefully harming innocent animals. I will explore how animal testing can affect the health of the animals and if there is possibly a better alternative rather than testing on animals.
As of 2015, 200 to 225 million animals are said to used in laboratory research for the biomedical industry annually worldwide. Typically defended by arguments of reliability and human health benefits, recently the question of ethics and values placed on animal testing have caused it to become a relevant and pressing topic that has been more widely discussed and debated. First off, the laboratory conditions that are instigated upon millions of animal models for the sake of medical research has been said to be unethical and cruel. Additionally, it has been debated that the results of animal experimentation are unreliable across a wide range of areas. Lastly, animal testing not only leads away from the direction of resources from more effective testing methods but also prolongs the duration of time humans may need to wait for an effective cure. Therefore, the potential benefits of animal experimentation are greatly outweighed by the risks and collective harm of humans and animals which is why resources should be directed towards more human-based testing procedures.
In addition to the fact that animal experimentation is ineffective, unreliable, and costly, testing on animals also violates animal rights. Do we think that just because we are superior to animals that we have the right to subject these innocent creatures to cruel and painful experiments? The superiority humans feel over animals may be the reason why humans feel less troubled by inflicting pain on animals. Or perhaps humans justify this cruel act by saying that animals would not be used in experiments if their use was not absolutely necessary. The pain and misery these animals are put through is absolutely unjustified, especially since the experiments they are subject to are proven to be unnecessary and even pointless. As Ingrid Newkirk states, animals in the laboratories are "under constant stress from fear, the loss of control over their lives, and the denial of all
are not able to give consent for this as would be required of a human. Other
Humankind would not be developed and improved without advancement of biosciences and technology. Besides many aspects of life that scientists are working on researching to provide a high-quality life for human beings, public health is one of the main areas. As a matter of fact, scientists have conducted a number of experiments to evaluate side effects of new medicines. As a result, animals are the top testing samples which have brought into many controversies for years about using testing them for scientific purpose. In this essay, the idea of supporting this practice will argue reasons why scientists should use animals for testing.
Thanks to animal testing, millions of lives are saved per year from otherwise untreatable diseases. When vaccines or antibodies are tested, mice are usually the ones being tested on. In order for humans to stay healthy, other animals are used to test out new medicines that can save lots of lives. Human benefit outweighs the lives of other animals, because If we don’t test out vaccines, there will be no verifiable vaccines to use as a cure.
The method of using animals for testing of human products has been a controversial issue for the last thirty years. Animal testing has been a considerably debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong. Animal testing is wrong because of the other side says that animals are the closest things to humans. Testing on animals harms the animals and does not do us any good.
Animal Testing is a issue. Because people use bad tests on animals so people do not test it on humans. Animal testing if you say it is wright well you are wrong. The only testing should be on humans. I hate that people do that to animals and some tests even kill the creature. The only animal that should be tested on is the alligator or a crocodile.
Animals are used in the scientific research field in order for us to advance our understanding of the living body, how it works as a whole in both healthy and disease states, as well as to assure the safety of new medical treatments for both humans and animals. Animals are a necessity in medical research when it is impractical or unethical to use humans 1. Biological processes are surprisingly similar in animals and humans and both share a multitude of similar illnesses, giving animals the ability to act as a model for the study of human disease2. Almost all human genes known to be associated with diseases have corresponding genes in the rat genome and appear highly conserved through mammalian evolution, which further backs up their use as
“Many medical treatments have been made possible by animal testing, including cancer and HIV drugs, insulin, antibiotics, vaccines and many more” (Murnaghan 1).
The controversy behind animals as research subjects is mainly one of morals and the ethical treatment of said animals. Many people believe we should use them in this way, so we aren 't actually harming people in the pursuit for better things for humans. Though animal testing was a viable resource for many years, it has proven to be extremely controversial and unethical, therefor the use of animals as research subjects should be outlawed.
Who would you want to see live animals or humans? Clearly it must be humans. Animal experiments are the process in which wise researchers develop products by evaluating the effects of those products on animals. Animal testing must progress, because if it does not people could not use what they are using, such as medication and makeup. Before animal testing doctors could not be as confent as they are today, but because of animal testing, doctors can diagnose the patients. As a result, animal research must advance.Animal research must progress since it helps to cure men, women, and children
Every year, a multitude of animals of all different shapes, sizes, and species are taken from their homes. These animals are subjected to animal testing, the use of animals in order to gain control over the variables that affect our bodies behavior. People are taking these animals from their homes to research and study things that could easily be tested using alternate methods. So a very important question stands, why do corporations continue to test on animals? Due to its unethical nature, animal testing should no longer be practiced anywhere in the world.