Convergent Media And Privacy Analysis

The debate between where to draw the line between allowing government surveillance and keeping society’s members privacy will never be completely clear. It is important to keep a part of an individual’s life private and once the Untied States voted the Patriot Act in privacy went from limited to microscopic. Widening the scope of government surveillance slowly but surely pushes privacy out of the

The United States is not surveillance society, but the government’s ability to collect data and “spy” on its people has reached an all time high in the digital age. Americans must continue to discuss and debate the government’s ability and limits in monitoring its citizens in the modern day. ()

Modern Americans see privacy as one of the greatest freedoms. When Edward Snowden revealed the NSA surveillance program, the citizens of the United States were appalled by the extent of access the NSA had to personal information. However, according to Dan Tapscott in his essay, “Should We Ditch the Idea of Privacy?” we post just as many details daily on our numerous social media outlets. The majority of the information we freely post is not meaningful and does no harm to us by being public, yet there is a dangerous side to our open-book nature.

As a growing topic of discussion, privacy in our society has stirred quite some concern. With the increase of technology and social networking our standards for privacy have been altered and the boundary between privacy and government has been blurred. In the article, Visible Man: Ethics in a World Without Secrets, Peter Singer addresses the different aspects of privacy that are being affected through the use of technology. The role of privacy in a democratic society is a tricky endeavor, however, each individual has a right to privacy. In our society, surveillance undermines privacy and without privacy there can be no democracy.

It is important to realize the dangers of government surveillance; personal information containing sensitive details about an individual 's private life put in the wrong hands or otherwise used incorrectly could potentially have disastrous repercussions. In today 's interconnected world, everything that is said and done online is

In today’s society, the word “privacy” has become ubiquitous. When discussing whether government surveillance and data collection pose a threat to privacy, the most common retort against privacy advocates – by those in favor of databases, video surveillance, spyware, data mining and other modern surveillance measures – is this line: "If I’m not doing anything wrong, what would I have to hide?" The allowance of the government’s gathering and analysis of our personal information stems from an inadequate definition of what privacy is and the eternal value that privacy possesses. The adherents of the “nothing-to-hide” argument say that because the information will never be disclosed to the public, the “privacy interest is minimal, and the security interest in preventing terrorism is much more important.” 1 In an era where the patterns we leave behind will inevitably become the focus for whatever authority, the issue of privacy affects more than just individuals hiding a wrong. In this essay, I will explore the state of online privacy in wake of the government’s warrantless data collection. Respectively, the nothing-to-hide argument and its key variants in more depth.

The report puts forward some questions about how mass surveillance is affecting our country, and where to draw the line when it comes to watching our population. The main aim of this article is to shed the light on how far the government is taking public surveillance so that people can know exactly how private their lives are, and make a

There is a lot of debate about privacy, where it is going, if it still prevails, and what it means for society. Without a doubt, privacy is under threat and will never be the same as it once was. In the past decade, the evolution of social media and technology has changed the definition of privacy, and has transformed American culture. 1984 wasn’t completely right about what the future would look like, but it was right about how big Brother is always watching us. Big Brother in our world would be the government. Although technology is useful for security purposes, technology has proven to be too invasive which leads to big problems down the road. In the past decade, the evolution of social media and technology has changed the definition of privacy, and has transformed American culture.

“If we destroy human rights and rule of law in response to terrorism, they have won”(Joichi Ito). Ever since technology has been available widely around the world, privacy has been a problem. recently , government officials had admitted to collecting data from online databases. The government should not be continuing this violation of privacy for the following reasons, privacy is a basic human right, it is not insured that the people viewing the data will not be corrupt, and because people will no longer be creative or have ideas of their own.

On September 11, 2001 people’s eyes from all over the world were witnessing one of the most dramatic events that was broadcast live. This major terrorist attack was followed by many, and lead our governments to take drastic measures to prevent as much as possible this kind of situation to happen again. Privacy did not become the first priority for the authorities, safety was. When Edward Snowden released through media classified National Security Agency’s documents regarding global surveillance among citizens, he opened a debate over mass surveillance and its legitimacy, which is still ongoing. Even though it can be used for the greater good, mass surveillance clearly leads to some issues that have both a significant impact on the population and the government.

The widespread use of information technology, automatic data processing techniques, the formation of global information systems, access to which can be virtually made by any person from anywhere in the world – these are the real characteristics of the gaining momentum digital era. On the one hand, the benefits of free access to information directly provide the realization of one of the most important democratic rights to freedom of information to citizens. The management of large-scale automated databases not only significantly optimizes the various processes of preparation and decision-making but also facilitates citizens’ access to the digital market – from the use of credit cards to the formation of a biometric portrait and projection of possible diseases. On the other hand, the widespread use of personal data by public authorities, businesses and social organizations significantly increases the risk of intrusion by unauthorized persons in the private sphere of a person, creating an infringement threat of one of its fundamental natural rights – the right to privacy (Bygrave, 2014).

Data surveillance is a way for government and special agency to collect personal information from different sources or monitoring people’s daily life activities. Data surveillance is the far cheapest and yet the easiest way to have control over people and its popularity increasis mildly in different fields (Ethicapublishing 1). Data surveillance can be used to observe people’s actions or examine their situations. An article called “Ethical Issues of Data Surveillance” states that every item we use or every action we do in our daily life is being tracked down by government since 1980s. In today’s world government uses surveillance techniques to have control over their

O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. Beijing, 2000. 1st ed. Net Library. Manhattanville Coll. Lib., Purchase, NY. 28, Nov. 2004< http://www.netlibrary.com > Database Nation illustrates current trends central to the technology sector of society. By addressing the role of the government and its correlation with technology, the concept of privacy is thoroughly examined. It is written with the intention of reminding the audience, technology will continue to violate the right to privacy. The more informed the individual, the better chance one has to understand, and address the hazards of technology. This book was first published in 2000, with the intentions of informing the general public of the role that government

Identity theft and online predators are the most serious concerns for most people using the net. Furthermore, because of these crimes, the government plays the role of “Big Brother” once again. Sherry Turkle, author of “How Computers Change the Way We Think,” talks about the violation of privacy because of government interference. “Today’s college students are habituated to a world of online blogging, instant messaging, and Web browsing that leaves electronic traces. Yet they have had little experience with the right to privacy. Unlike past generations of Americans, who grew up with the notion that the privacy of their mail was sacrosanct, our children are accustomed to electronic surveillance as part of their daily lives” (Turkle 399). It seems, though, that at this time government interference is welcomed because of the dangers without it. There may not be ways to completely banish these crimes, but there is much that can be done, and is being done, to prevent these crimes from happening.

In early June 2013, the Guardian newspaper reported that the US National Security Agency (NSA) was collecting the telephone records of tens of millions of American citizens (Greenwald 27). Edward Snowden was the source of the report. He is a computer expert, who used to work for the CIA of the United States, but was turned into a whistleblower and exposed the U.S. government’s secret surveillance programs. The leaks by him show that the NSA and British intelligence agencies have had a consistently evolving set of tools and methods for gleaning information from hard to reach systems. Prior to this event, most U.S. citizens had not known that their government agencies had been surveilling their private data. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies have used surveillance so that they can glean information, detect or prevent crime and terrorism, and investigate them after they took place. Surveillance is defined as manipulating close observations of an individual or a group. As technology like smart phones and social network services develops, the vast amount of information about individuals and their opinions has become readily available in the Internet and associated digital devices. Most of them are unencrypted and can be easily exposed to prying eyes. The reason why mass surveillance becomes the center of the controversy is