Conversial Statements Of Mani Shankar Aiyar

This quotes impact on was that nobody was going from stop him from being smart. People expected Indians

In the fifth paragraph, Gandhi said, "The cottage industry, so vital for India's existence, has been ruined by incredibly heartless and inhuman processes as described by English witnesses." Everyone can agree with Gandhi on how the cottage industry is vital to India's existence and how inhuman it was. This was even said by English witnesses. This is a good a way to persuade people to listen to you because if everyone can agree with you on something, then you will get more people to tune in to your

Minister's Speech (page 102) - During this speech it is revealed that in the near future there is going to be political turmoil of some sort because he says that they "...may be needing all our prison space for political offenders". This shows that the government is going to become even more oppressive and intolerant than it previously was, as they are simply going to throw those who stand in their way in jail. As a result of this, he

From the very beginning of his speech, Gandhi explains and emphasizes his credibility through the use of ethos. Gandhi starts with the statement, “ There are people who ask me whether I am the same man that I was in 1920” (1). This statement was meant to emphasize that some people are starting to question his credibility. Gandhi quickly follows up with the statement, “ I have not changed in any fundamental respect” (1). By saying this, he quickly reestablishes his credibility with the audience. This is very important for his audience because if they no longer think he is credible, then they are more than likely not going to listen to what he has to say. Gandhi knows that he hasn’t changed his ideals and he lets the audience know this. His credibility, or ethos, is paramount to whether or not his speech will be successful. He is trying to convince a nation to declare its independence. His use of ethos helps to convince the audience that his ideals are right and that they should do as he says.

Modi was the Chief Minister of the state of Gujarat in India for thirteen years before he became prime minister. He came from a poor family, and worked on the sides of the streets to make money for him and his family, which consisted of his mother, father, and five other siblings. He started attending political lectures when he eight, and as the years went by he saw how much India needed someone who would bring change. Once he was in office, he started to put in new reforms against rape, public officials, strengthening the economy, and building better relationships with other countries (Modi’s Unexpected Boost). Modi is the first man since the Gandhi-Nehru reign in India; the nation is very excited to have him as their

“Bombastic, rude...” Meade said. “You have to have some decency. ... You have to be presidential. I wouldn’t even like to have him as a friend, to be honest with you,” she said.

I would agree with your assessment for the most part, but I do feel that law enforcement officers are held to a higher standard. Because of this, I believe the command does have an interest in knowing what their officers are doing on their own time. One reason is they simply have to be accountable as an officer of the law all the time regardless of whether or not on duty. The other reason is that many new officers, especially young officers, may not realize they are causing a conflict of interest without departmental guidance. For these reasons, the agency has a vested interest to some degree (such as secondary employment) what their officers are doing on their off time.

trip to Pretoria Gandhi was thrown off the train ride because a white man objected his

“SARI stop yelling and don’t forget your lunch. Hurry back home with Koleen today and don't be late. At 3:00 we are going to watch the speech from President Tory.”

Macdonald for “accepting campaign funds from the very man he was negotiating a contract of major importance in the national interest” effectively ending his career in a valiant effort to unify the nation.

His character, Dev, does not know how to properly respond to being associated with racist remarks that agitate him. Even after consulting to close friends, he doesn’t know how to act out against racism. This is what Ansari

<br>36, 1994) This Congress, however, had no power in terms of action and it can be seen as an attempt by the British to appease Indian nationalists who wanted progress. The seeming uselessness of the Indian National

impression given is that he is a very good man indeed. It is as if he

As this extract is a primary source, it is highly reliable and useful. It is also relevant and valuable in assisting me in my historical investigation. This speech demonstrates his motivation and the profound impact he had over the nation. It also shows his role during the war and what he did as Prime Minister. The speech

Memoirs of Paul Keating Mummy’s boy will not refrain Politics he will play Letterboxing and polling Labour’s split-1950 Amounts to a cohesion Equality is his ethic Youngest minister of a labour branch Born at the end of ww2 Equality is honourable Good people failing to beat Hitler Is a forever enigma?