Cope Inventory Paper

Within the MyManagmentLab for the Managing People in Organizations, class there is a section called Personal Inventory Assessments. These are short questionnaires to evaluate different aspects of a person’s life. I did multiple ones but the three personal inventory assessments I found most useful where the stress management assessment, the self-awareness assessment and the time management assessment. The stress management quiz analyzed how I manage and react during stressful situations with my results being 24. My results said that I have a high resilience to stress and do not get worried very easily, however, I am not very effective at eliminating stress or developing coping strategies when I do ultimately get stressed. I can definitely relate to this because when I am stressed about something, I usually just give up on it and quit or push it off until the last minute, which usually results in more stress.

Then, the measure yields a total difficulty score (Goodman, 1997). The respondent is asked to answer questions pertaining to the child’s behavior.

Leventhal et al. did not identify the type of their theory. However, the words and sentences that they mentioned in the CSM can categorize as a middle-range theory. The CSM was proposed to provide the framework for depicting the self-regulation when individuals have to encounter stress caused by an illness and understanding the processes involved in problem-coping. Leventhal et al. described that the CSM consists of three core concepts: representation of illness, coping, and coping appraisal. The relationship between the concepts was presented in the parallel processing system that interact as the individual adapts to each specific situation. These processes lead individuals to seek health care for acute illnesses and manage their illness for chronic conditions. Additionally, the CSM was used as a theoretical framework in research and applied in practice, particularly psychological, behavioral, and nursing fields. The results of study can make possible intervention which would help patients develop valid coping processes. Consequently, The CSM can be classified as a middle-range predictive theory.

Coping-Stress Tolerance Pattern: Flora’s family cope with stressful life events in two ways: being involved in any Christian activities (praying to God, attending church, etc.) and speaking with family, friends, and the church pastor for consolation. The family has no history of chemical abuse such as alcohol and drugs. The strength the family has to help counterbalance any stress is having strong support systems through church, work, community, and extended family. One common major stressful family situation is constant flooding at their current home that results in frequent power outages and destruction of household valuables due to hurricanes and heavy rainstorms; this happens about two or three times a year. The family sees stress and children’s health and development as separate. Stress is more of an individual concern and children’s health and development is more of a family concern which involves, for example, annual physicals. The family makes appraisals of a stressor by praying to God for things to get better which is realistic because it is part of a Christian custom to have a spiritual communication with God. The family resources consist of having an emergency life fund, a separate bank account untouched unless a traumatic event occurs, cars, computer access, phone service, etc. Due to the rise in technology, the family is able to link with other family or community resources through computer via social media,

Clinician met with individual out of LCCC at LPS for regular scheduled appointment. Since this was the 1st session, Clinician utilized the "Mood Dude Heads " and "FeeLeez" to build therapeutic rapport, to explore triggers/resources for current stressors, and to explore also his ability to follow instructions and self control. Clinician asked open-end and close-end questions to assess current levels of functioning, including thoughts and feelings.

Taylor, C. (2015). Fundamentals: Ch 3 (Health and Illness); Ch. 40 (Self-concept); Ch. 41 (Stress and Adaptation).

In the article “Assessing Coping Strategies: A Theoretically Based Approach” by Carver, Scheier, and Weintraub, it states the different types of coping responses for stress. There are three main types: problem-focused coping, emotional-focused coping and “less useful” coping responses. And there are subtypes for each one of them. To figure out what type of coping one uses during stress, one can take a coping questionnaire. I took this questionnaire and found out that the major coping responses I use are two types of emotional-focused coping and one less useful coping response.

Scientific journals follow critical reading guidelines that establish your credibility. Elizabeth N. Burris and Shevaun D Neupert from North Carolina State University explore this topic in relation to Mood Repair and Daily stressors. In their article Mood Management: Mood Repair and Daily Stressors Correlate with Daily Affect they are looking for whether individual differences in mood repair would predict emotional reactivity to daily stressors. In this study Elizabeth N. Burris and Shevaun D. Neupert focus on a sample of 43 community dwelling older adults who were part of a larger study called Anticipatory coping Every Day and completed a 8 day daily diary. When picking potential participants if they got a score greater than or equal to 8 on the Short Blessed Test, cognitive impairment screening, were admitted into the study. This study used different tasks to measure the Daily Positive and Negative Affect and Daily Stressors. In conclusion this study found that there was a increase in the amount of negative

The instrument asks participants to rate, on a 5-point Likert-type scale, the extent to which they (1) strongly disagree (2) disagree (3) neither disagree nor agree (4) agree, or (5) strongly agree with statements relating to mood recognition, emotional regulation, and empathy. Sample statements include “I easily recognize my emotions as I experience them” and “It is difficult for me to understand why people feel the way they do”. The scale has previously shown to have good construct validity with a Cronbach’s alpha of .90 (Schutte et al.

Coping in the third chapter of the Health Psychology book is defined as “individual efforts to manage distressing problems and emotions that affect the physical and psychological outcomes of stress.” We’ve learned that coping is what balances our homeostatic. When looking at it from the outside in, it’s two ways to break down coping: problem-focused and emotion-focused. I can say, I’m stressing about writing my health psychology exam because I didn’t study. There are two ways I can deal with it.

According to the test my most prominent coping styles are planning and active coping because they were both the highest scores I got on the coping test. The ways I use to cope are healthy and effective ways to manage stressors because I don’t use them in negative ways. Planning can be positive or negative because you could make a plan of action with negative or positive consequences. Active coping can exhaust you if you concentrate too much effort into handling the stress, but has positive consequences if you take it slow by going one step at a time. My score of mental disengagement was fairly high, but not the highest I scored on within this coping test.

This paper looked at a variety of factors that could be predicted using the Big Five inventory such as: academic performance, social media use, work performance and satisfaction, mental and physical health, and satisfaction within romantic relationships; as well as the relationships between these variables. As mentioned prior, the Big Five inventory has been implemented by many researchers regarding a multitude of studies because of its simplicity and validity. As referenced throughout the paper, there were a variety of studies which implemented the Big Five inventory and the results of these studies were similar with synonymous studies. Although the Big Five is one of the primary modes for assessing personality, personality psychologists are

Coping questions are supposed to build on the client’s strengths and resources. Also on what helped the client get this far to wear they are now or what has helped stop them from doing anything drastic. Exception questions are, questions asked to help client remember a positive time throughout their crisis. It is also to encourage them to think less negatively, providing a bit of hope. Scaling questions are posed for the client to be able to recognize were they are

Over the years, people have gotten themselves into more stressful situations or conditions, which are called stressors, throughout their lives, whether it is their career, family, friends, an event, or other things that tends to stress people out (Meichenbaum, 2007, p. 1). Donald Meichenbaum decided that he wanted to help others solve that problem. Meichenbaum and a few of his colleagues came together to create cognitive behavioral therapy due to this increase (Meichenbaum, 2007, p. 2). After a while, Donald Meichenbaum and a few of his colleagues created Stress Inoculation Training in the mid-1970s. Stress Inoculation Training (SIT) is a treatment program that makes efforts in helping people take control over finding a positive way in dealing with stressful events and also being ready in advance to handle stressful situations (Meichenbaum, 2007, p. 8). This stress intervention is broken up into three phases: the conceptualization or educational phase, the skill acquisition and rehearsal phase, and the application and follow through phase (Admi, 1997, p. 39).

Coping strategies refer to the specific efforts, both behavioral and psychological, that people employ to master, tolerate, reduce or minimize stressful events. There are two general coping strategies which have been distinguished. Problem-focused strategies are efforts to do something active to alleviate stressful circumstances, where as emotion-focused coping strategies involve efforts to regulate the emotional consequences of stressful or potentially stressful events. Typically, people use both problem-focused and emotion-focused coping in their stressful episodes, which suggests that both types of coping are useful for most stressful events (Folkman & Lazarus, 1980).