Corporate, And Federal Funding

The Federal Disaster Assistance Nonprofit Fairness Act of 2013 (H.R. 592), is a bill that would correct this and allow relief funding to go these organizations. So far the bill has passed the House by a large margin. The bill is also being criticized by it’s opponents for it’s use of taxpayer money to help tax-exempt organizations as well as violating the principle of separation of church and state.

Interestingly enough all five companies lead to the same place. Millions of dollars have been funneled to these companies by the same foundation and consequently the same man. That's right, one man; Bill Gates via the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Gates has donated close to $62.6 million to just these five companies alone. He also gave the NGA and CCSSO a combined amount of $104.7 million (Schneider).

(Brimley 2008) However, to equalize funds and maximize cost quality relationships grants and incentives are good places to start. School districts have to find ways to hire knowledgeable and committed teachers. One way to draw the knowledgeable teacher is to offer stipends for teacher shortage areas and sign on bonuses. Districts must continue to offer some type of incentives to maintain good teachers. Teacher tenure is another great incentive but can sometimes cause good teachers to become too laidback. Tenure grants educators “a right, term, or mode of holding or occupying something of value for a period of time.” (Tenure) Basically, tenure in the education realm grants what some would call stability or even security.

In recent years, the federal aid system has tripled in numbers in over 25 years. Some federal aid programs can range from a giant billion to a more obscure prams such as $15 million. In the beginning, federal aid programs would require other states to match the federal funds on a dollar for dollar basis. There was initial struggle when the federal aid system began to expand many believe that it would be difficult to opt out of new federal aid programs. Thus, it left residents with requirement to continue to pay federal taxes in order to support the federal aid spending.

Government aid/assistance, or as others may know it, welfare, was created in order to provide assistance and aid to those in the community that may be unemployed or in need of assistance due to a lack of income for both individuals as well as families. In the beginning it was the federal government that managed the assistance program but that was only until the government assistance reform took place, which sent the jurisdiction back down to the states. There was a strong urge from the American citizens to reform the system due to the fact that many Americans believed that the government assistance program was being abused by those utilizing the program. Many Americans believed that those utilizing welfare were not looking for employment, not marrying in order to gain more funding and actually having more children in order to qualify for more cash assistance. Throughout this paper I will discuss each of the subsequent topics: a history of government aid/assistance in the U.S., a synopsis of the situation that created the proposal as well as the enactments of required drug testing, opinions in support of drug testing, ethical consequences based on this proposal for individuals, for the society as a whole, and for public health.

The foundation supported a wide variety of groups, favoring Jewish charities, veteran’s groups, the arts and children’s non-profits. Almost all of the foundation’s gifts during this period were for amounts less than $1,000. There were however a few exceptions: Jewish Community Foundation $100,000 given in FY12 (this was the only gift in FY12 over $1,000), Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles ($27,500 given FY14 and $26,000 in FY13) and Jewish Home for the Aging ($22,250 given FY14, $25,900 given

Sourcing funding is vital in enabling Local Authorities to provide important services to meet the needs of the local community. Spending by local authorities is divided into current expenditure and capital expenditure, which form separate accounts. Current expenditure covers the day-to-day running of the local authority including housing maintenance, salaries, pensions and operational costs. Current expenditure is funded from a variety of sources including:

specified in Proposition 1A. However, as time passes, the initial estimate is beginning to look like a low-ball. The construction process has taken longer than expected up until this point, and that has many direct and indirect costs associated. Some of these include increased number of work hours, job site utilities, and equipment rentals (Cox). Because of this increase in price, the state of California has tried to match federal funding with private investors. This, however, has been a slow and uncertain process. Another overestimation on the side of the CAHSR is in train times. Cox argues that the CHSRA’s anticipated average speeds are not being achieved anywhere in the world, even on the most advanced lines. He also states that “ the HSR would be unattractive to drivers in middle-distance automobile markets because little or no door-to-door time savings would be achieved and costly local connections would often be required (rental cars or taxicabs).” California lacks the extensive local transit infrastructure in the Central Valley that can be found in dense Asian and European areas; these smaller connecting systems are what make the high-speed rail so effective on other continents. Without them, it is a lengthier process for consumers to get to their end destination – they have to use both the public transit and their own form of transportation. This could have a negative effect on ridership because consumers will forego the hassle of changing transportation methods and

and evicted criminals who encounter these same hardships and most of the time fail to get

Scattered throughout many cities in the U.S., one will find a variety of nonprofit organizations that assist and work with individuals and families suffering from addictions, homelessness, and poverty. A crucial part of the safety net, these organizations rely on a mix of public and private funding to fulfill their goals, which range widely across a number of constituencies and needs. Some of them are branches of international organizations, such as the Salvation Army, while others are often agencies with local roots. Some

Taylor Swift topped the list of 20 most generous celebrities of 2015 for their charity work

Bosgieter, funding for Catholic Community Services of Ogden comes entirely from donation 40% from the Utah food bank, 30% from grocery rescue, and 30% from private donation (personal communication, February 5, 2014). Crosson-Tower (2013) suggests twelve strategies to solve child poverty (pp. 73-75). Outlined below, Catholic Community Services of Ogden utilizes three of those strategies.

Private foundations take the money that they receive from individuals and give it to a foundation based on personal ideas of the member.(4) Corporate foundations receive contributions from a profit-making body.(4) Community foundations give contributions within a community.(4) Direct giving programs donate to charitable causes.(4) Voluntary agencies support charitable programs that are consistent with their overall mission.(4) Lastly, community groups focus on supporting projects within their specific community. (4) All of these types of donations are used to fund the USDA and all of the projects it is involved

Financial statistics of the overall organizations will help to compare the statistics of the two specific locations this paper focuses on. According to the Forbes largest U.s Charities list, previously mentioned, The Salvation Army’s overall fundraising is 90% effective whereas Feeding America’s fundraising is reported to be 99% effective. (“The 50 Largest U.S. Charities”, n.d.) A lot of these statistics show that Feeding America has higher percentages in most areas compared to the Salvation Army. This is because, again looking at 2014, The Salvation Army received $344 million from the government because they are a religious organization. (“The 50 Largest U.S. Charities: Salvation Army, n.d.) This also explains why Feeding America has 99% donor dependency rate where the Salvation Army only has a 70% rate. (“The 50 Largest U.S. Charities”,

When we look at those that are in need many of them are worried about where they are going to stay for the night or where they are going to get their next meal, they are not worried about what they have to do to get assistance from a specific organization. When groups are looking for federal funding they have to meet the requires and many of those requirements are to be a more secular organization losing the true meaning of the organization. In the video Dan Evan, a Baptist that runs a homeless shelter states that getting federal funds means that the religious group has to deny their essential message, which is a good point (Tempting Faith, 2002). Charitable Choice was initiated by the federal government to allow faith-based organizations to receive federal funding as long as the organizations were