Brenda Franklin had been serving Allied Tech for the past 8 years. As any other organisations, Brenda used to be a part of the lunch hour conversations with her colleagues. One day when her colleagues were discussing about corruption and politics, something occurred to her. As a result she prepared a list called “Ethically Dubious Conduct” and pasted it on the common notice board. Her colleagues were taken by surprise. Brenda was now anticipating the next lunch where she was expecting her list to be analysed among her colleagues.
2.0 Review each item on Brenda’s list and assess the conduct in question. Do you find it morally acceptable, morally unacceptable or somewhere in between? Explain.
The following items on Brenda’s list may be
…show more content…
According to the consequentialist theory (Cummiskey, 1989), if the activities of the employees do not interrupt the business of the organisations then the activities can be morally acceptable. 3.0 Examine Brenda’s list from both the Utilitarianism and the Kantian perspectives. What arguments can be given for and against the conduct on her list? Is the rightness or wrongness of some items a matter of degree? Can an action (such as taking a pad of paper) be both trivial and wrong?
Utilitarianism (Riley, 2010) is the belief that an action can be judged to be right only when it produces happiness to the majority of the population. So long as the particular activity of the employee is not causing any harm to the organisation and also making the employee contented in due course, the acts can be considered to be morally acceptable on the basis of the utilitarian principles. So actions like using the office telephone, office postage, using the office transport, making unnecessary expenses on office trips, taking afternoon off on business outings can be supported on the basis of utilitarian principles.
Kantian ethics believes that rightness of an action does not depend on the consequences but on whether they fulfil the duties. So as long as the employees fulfil their duties and do not harm the organisation in any way, the activities can be supported.
Rightness is not a matter of degree but acceptability is. A particular action can either be right or wrong.
Consequently, it is my opinion that both Brian and Lauren have breached the ethics and all liable to be reported to the ethics officer of the firm. After reading Sue Garcia’s response to Lauren, I am inclined to believe that this may not be the first time for the company to deal with insider trading and other unethical practices. This indeed warrants for the firm to take decisions accordingly to restructure its ethical
Ethics in business addresses the ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ behaviours of business practises, and how these practices impact the employees, shareholders, the general public and the environment.
Another important factor to consider is if each of the organization's employees is being treated fairly. An organization should ensure that they create and follow a code of ethics in which employees feel that both the employee and the employer are held accountable and encouraged to be ethical in treatment to one another. This translates as a feeling by employees that the employer trusts them in their jobs and professions and that all employees are treated fairly and justly in all actions and company pursuits. This means that each employee should be treated
In this essay, I will be writing about utilitarianism and the most important notion that arises from it, which is that an action is morally right only if it maximizes the greatest good for the greatest number of people (Cahn, 114). First, I will explain what utilitarianism is, when and by whom it was originally created, and a brief explanation of what it stands for. I will then explain the two different types of classical utilitarianism and explain the differences between the two. Next, I will give two arguments to why the utilitarian position is not satisfactory. I will also be giving possible counter-arguments that the utilitarianisms would have stated and then my own arguments to these counter-arguments. I will then conclude the essay by stating my thesis again and by briefing the reader on the main topics which were covered in this essay.
In the workplace as well as one’s personal life is essential for ethics to be maintained; often taking the right action is not always the most popular choice. It is important for maintaining an upstanding ethical code of conduct to be a productive individual as well as function as an employee in the workplace.
The company’s code of ethics required the employees to obey all safety laws, health and environment regulations. To conduct themselves in the community with good citizenship with in the corporate surroundings. Appropriate accounting was established for internal controls and record keeping to meet both legal and business requirements. Employees are expected to follow the policies and controls set by the accounting principles.
The ethical issues outlined in this case are whether Spc. Darby’s whistle-blowing decision was correct and if Spc. Sivits’s claims of obedience and rule following are sufficient for his decision to not blow the whistle.
Today’s business world presents numerous ethical issues. In today’s world above board/moral ethics in organizations do not often materialize intuitively. Organization must strive to provide employees with a clear understanding of the overall company vision. This will aid employees in practicing the code of ethics, policies and procedures in the workplace. Companies must be unwavering in continuously delivering the uppermost ethics of provision in which customers, applicants and employees are entitled to under fair business practices. One major core value is to uphold responsible and fair business practices.
Ethics is the discipline that deals with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation (Carroll and Buchholtz, 2006). It can also be a set of moral principles or values. Morality is a doctrine of moral conduct and moral conduct relates to principles of right and wrong in behavior. Professional ethics, therefore, is concerned with good and bad or right and wrong behavior and practices that take place within a professional context. Concepts of right and wrong are increasingly being interpreted today to include the more difficult and subtle questions of fairness, justice and equity (Carroll and Buchholtz, 2006). Two key branches of ethics are descriptive ethics and normative ethics. Normative ethics is concerned with supplying and justifying a coherent moral system of thinking and judging. Normative ethics seeks to uncover, develop, and justify basic moral principles that are intended to guide behavior, actions, and decisions (DeGeorge, 1995). In this paper a decision made by a sales manager in the company is analyzed through various normative theories
Corporate social responsibility according to Henderson (2001) can be defined as the commitment of organizations to help society by improving working and living conditions of employees, their families, and the community as a whole.
Company sociable obligation in order to act ethically in order to your neighborhood group in addition to modern society in particular, in addition to strengthen the quality of lifetime from the labor force in addition to their families following the organization persists accomplishing this connected with monetary advancement. His or her cash flow through corporations should never merely think about his or her product in addition to companies advancement, but in addition which they 're able to consider the sociable rewards. Many ideas get told CSR through corporations in addition to companies at the moment are looking to budget for his or her time in the direction of CSR research.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a concept that means, when an enterprise generates profits and takes legal obligations to its shareholders and creditors, it should also be socially responsible for other stakeholders, such as employees, customers, community and the environment in which it operates. CSR encourages enterprises not only to pay attention to profits accumulation while operating, but also to make a contribution to consumers, the environment in which it operates as well as the whole of society.
The term Corporate Social Responsibility refers to a company’s responsibility to provide a benefit to the society the company affects. Corporate social responsibility incorporates dimensions of corporate responsibility, and corporate policy which include a company’s policy to hire minority or disabled workers, or taking a stance on social and political issues that benefit the community. The social portion of corporate social responsibility includes corporate charitable business contributions and expands on this common social business practice by invoking corporate social initiatives. For example, as a policy, Wal-Mart grocery store managers purchase as much produce and goods from local farmers and distributors they can as opposed to
Diversity strengthens unity and provides great power. With only like minds, success cannot be obtained. There must be an equally distributed balance of authority across all demographics for objectives to be met and move forward. Whether the public is willing to admit it or not, women matter tremendously. Women are underappreciated and lack proper significant representation in corporate America. Now is no longer the past and this is a blessing, but culturally as a people we must grow apart from traditional beliefs that hinder our growth as a society. With that beings said, it is beneficial to place women in top corporate positions because they enforce the following very important qualities:
The variation in the number of sales also interferes with the planning process within the company. Future projections are made based on the prospected sales hence profits by the company. Due to the fact that the sales of sportswear varies, the company cannot easily project its future growth as well as predict the profits it will make in future (Plunkett, 2009).