Corporate Social Responsibilities Of Apple Inc

There are conflicting expectations of the nature of a company’s responsibilities to society. However, those companies that undertake what may be termed ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’ must decide; what are the actual social responsibilities of these companies? I will present a possible paradigm. Also, I will look at the benefit to the business that employs proper management as compared the business with poor management. This research paper describes my view of corporate social responsibility and compares the social responsibilities of Delta Air Lines and Spirit

A stakeholder are anyone with an interest in the actions of the business. Apple is a business that has both internal and external stakeholders. These stakeholders are really important within the business as they help to keep the business running and also help the Apple to be successful overall. The best way in which Apple can have really good relationships with their stakeholders is by communicating effectively. There are many ways in which Apple as a business can dothis. Onemethodis the way they approach their stakeholders. This is important because if they (the company) approach their stakeholders in a positive way then they will get a positive outcome.

The expectation that businesses behave responsibly and positively contribute to society all while pursuing their economic goals is one that holds firm through all generations. Stakeholders, both market and nonmarket, expect businesses to be socially responsible. Many companies have responded to this by including this growing expectation as part of their overall business operations. There are companies in existence today whose sole purpose is to socially benefit society alongside businesses who simply combine social benefits with their economic goals as their company mission. These changes in societal expectations and thus company purpose we’ve seen in the business community over time often blurs the line of what it means to be socially

Apple values their stakeholders for the overall success of their corporation. While reading about Apple’s stakeholders I have come to like them more because they value their customers, employees and social responsibilities. “In Apple’s case, stakeholders significantly affect the business in terms of customer perception and sales revenues. For instance, the company addresses stakeholders’ environmental concerns through a policy on sustainable material sourcing. (Apple, Inc.) In Apple’s case, the following stakeholders are the most significant:

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is something that affects all companies and should be an active factor in the company’s decision making. It is something all corporations need to care about. CSR is when business’ or corporations take part in an initiative or campaign for a cause that will benefit society and/or in some way make the world a better place (Taylor, 2015). Initially, Corporate Social Responsibility started to take shape around the 1950’s, but some say that it dates all the way back to the 1800s, the idea of CSR was seen (Carroll, 2007). One may think that because it is dated so long ago, it doesn’t have an important impact today nevertheless, it is proven that Corporate Social Responsibility is a pathway for entities to self benefit as they are in the process of benefitting society.

Apple is also trying to act socially responsible in the way in which it operates. The company has been making products with durable batteries so that they do not run obsolete. In so doing the company works towards an environmental-friendly business environment. It is sensitive to the need for protecting and conserving the

Everywhere you look, all around the world, there are corporations, businesses, and companies. You can hear about them through all different types of advertisements and news outlets. It seems as if we are always helping companies by supporting them. We buy their products and promote their business. One question a lot of people wonder are “How are companies giving back”? These businesses do this in many ways. This is called Social Responsibility (Schiffman & Kanuk, 2010). This is the corporation’s obligation to give back to the society in a positive way (Schiffman & Kanuk, 2010).

According to Gordon Brown, Chancellor of the Exchequer, the modern day corporate social responsibility goes far beyond the old philanthropy of the past that is donating money to good causes at the end of the financial year and is instead an all year round responsibility that companies accept for the environment around them, for the best working practices, for their engagement in their local communities and for their recognition that brand names depend not only on quality, price and uniqueness but on how, cumulatively, they interact with companies’ workforce, community and environment. It is necessary to move towards a challenging measure of corporate responsibility, where judgment results are not just by the input

The Apple website provides a Supplier Responsibility statement “ Apple is committed to the highest standards of social responsibility across our worldwide supply chain. We insist that all of our suppliers provide safe working conditions, treat workers with dignity and respect and use environmentally responsible manufacturing processes. Our actions – from thorough site audits to industry-leading training programs – demonstrate his commitment” (Torres, Garcia-French, Hordjik, & Nguyen 2012. P. 29). While this may not be a specific (or particularly public) campaign, it does show that Apple recognizes the importance of exemplifying responsibility to its consumers. Instead of being a short-term response, this has become an integral part of Apple’s ethos – or at least the one that it reveals to the public domain and its consumers. This is the core mindset, found at the center of any successful CSR effort.

Title: Apple Inc., and their success with Sustainability, Ethics, Leadership, Corporate Social Responsibility and Triple Bottom Line reporting and Globalization.

The social psychologist Kurt Lewin (1890-1947), once wrote: “There is nothing as practical as a good theory”. According to this saying we tend to consider theory very important and that it can be helpful to guide us on the correct way. This doesn’t state that practice is not important as well. Therefore using a good balance between theory and practice can help to save cost and time.

Apple Incorporated was founded in April of 1976 by Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs. The founders of the corporation were college dropouts that worked together to build computer boxes which were sold without keyboards and power supplies. Apple Incorporated is an American multinational technology company headquartered in Cupertino, California, that designs, develops, and sells consumer electronics, computer software, and online services understands that without their stakeholders The purpose of this paper is to specify the nature, structure, and types of products or services offer. This paper will look into the factors that influence Apple’s external environment. This paper will also explore Apple’s stakeholder influence and its controversial corporate social responsibility. (Apple Computer, Inc. - Company Profile, Information, Business Description, History, Background Information on Apple Computer, Inc.)

Corporate social responsibility has been one the key business buzz words of the 21st century. Consumers' discontent with the corporation has forced it to try and rectify its negative image by associating its name with good deeds. Social responsibility has become one of the corporation's most pressing issues, each company striving to outdo the next with its philanthropic image. People feel that the corporation has done great harm to both the environment and to society and that with all of its wealth and power, it should be leading the fight to save the Earth, to combat poverty and illness and etc. "Corporations are now expected to deliver the good, not just the goods; to pursue

The main moral issue in this case study is whether Apple is responsible for the mis-treatment of Foxconn Employees. In this paper, I will use the moral theories of rights-based ethics, moral relativism, and moral universalism as well ethical views from well-known authors Jacobsen and Friedman to explore where Apple 's moral responsibilities should lie. There is no doubt that the conditions at Foxconn are unfortunate, and ought to be improved; however in my opinion I believe Apple is not morally responsible for the mistreatment of Foxconn Employees since Friedman and Jacobsen argue the social responsibility of Apple should not include charitable actives such as supporting Foxconn employees and since what is right or wrong varies between different cultures according to the principle of moral relativism.

McDonald’s Corporation is the world’s leading fast food service retailer with over 36,000 restaurants serving approximately 69 million customers in over 100 countries every day. McDonald’s Corporation view themselves primarily as a franchisor that believes that franchising is important in delivering great customer experiences and driving profitability. As of 2014, more than 80% of McDonald’s restaurants were franchised to independent local franchisees around the world. (AboutMcdonalds.com 2015) In the 1970’s Milton Friedman argued that the only social responsibility of a business is to increase profit and any activity that detracted from this responsibility for profit maximisation was considered to be inefficient. (Hanks 2015) Despite the limitations of compliance costs and stakeholder conflicts, many large corporations today have integrated corporate social responsibility and sustainability into their business practices to assist in the development of overall profit maximization. In this critical essay, it will examine and critique two aspects of McDonald’s performance areas with regards to fulfilling society’s expectations on how the corporation should operate its business. It will focus on the positive and negative aspects of food nutrition-health and employment in McDonald’s. Last but not least, by exploring these performance areas, the impact and implications of McDonald’s actions on society and stakeholders will also discussed.