Corporate Social Responsibility Of India Essay

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a very controversial topic. A question that has been debated for the past few decades is; is it corporately viable to introduce social responsibility as a proposed addition to the work ethic of business organisations. As well as, if adopting the framework of corporate social responsibility would yield positive improvements for those organisations.

The author tries to find out whether making CSR a mandatory requirement for the companies as a social responsibility will help in the upliftment of the society. CSR models previously were voluntary actions taken up by the corporations but the new CSR norms mandate this responsibility. The country is now moving towards MANDATORY, NOT VOLUNTARY CSR regimes. This Article begins with the origin of CSR during the Earth Summit in early 90’s and then its scenario in the Indian corporate sector. Some of the examples of volunteer CSR activities showcased the sincere efforts taken by certain major tycoons of Indian corporate sector and now after India being the first country to mandate CSR in the Companies Act will be a boon for social upliftment or not. According to the author, working for the undeveloped communities for the country is a work that required moral values within an individual or a corporate, making it mandatory will only add more confusions and an opportunity to tainted companies to go smooth in the eyes of law by means of corruption or extortion in the system. Moreover, penalizing only if reason not displayed by the Board in their Annual Report will not be the solution to the problem. This article will seek an understanding whether mandating CSR will be a boon to social upliftment or not and concludes by suggesting certain rewards or tax benefits for

Through globalization the gap between the rich and poor has increased, while the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. This can be one of the many reasons why companies choose to be more social responsible as CSR aims to reduce conflicts between stakeholders. Although, individuals are aware that more companies are producing social responsible goods, companies can benefit from CSR practices in different ways. When companies decide to be socially and environmentally active, not only will the society and the environment benefit from the companies ethical practices, but they can also differentiate themselves in today's competitive market.

Starting out as a management concept, CSR is now vital in every decision a business makes as it is believed to be the true manner in which a business should conduct itself (Environics International, 2001, cited in Sepahvand, 2015, p.9). The purpose of this report is to provide a discussion on Corporate Social Responsibility and also identify the benefits and challenges brought upon an organisation. Firstly, the author will give a brief introduction to the company, Elephant House. Secondly, the analysis will examine various definitions pertaining to CSR.

According to which business houses are looked upon as trustees of the resources which they draw from the society and are expected to return them back to the society in various forms. CSR is an extremely important concept for sustainable development of all stakeholders which includes all the people on whom the business has an impact particularly the society at large. Critics argue that CSR distract the companies from the economic role and dwindles their progress report, however the importance of CSR cannot be undermined. With the amendments of the companies act,Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013 contains provisions exclusively dealing with Corporate Social Responsibility. Where in the meaning of “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)” has been defined very clearly. A new provision relating to Corporate Social Responsibility has been introduces with the Act which provides that every company having specifies net worth or turnover or net profit during any financial year shall constitute the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee of it’s Board of Directors to formulate policies for the activities specified for the social and economic welfare of the people, particularly those who have remained deprived or neglected so

Archie Carroll defines corporate social responsibility (CSR) as “the social responsibility of business encompassing the economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary expectations that society has of these organizations at a given point in time.” (Crane, 5) Interesting enough, there has been an abrupt growth of firm’s engagement in CSR within all industries. This is the result of growing requests from the civil society demanding firms, of all sizes, to legitimize their practices. (Crane, 4)

The environmental aspect of Corporate Social Responsibility refers to operating a business in a way that promotes responsibility and accountability for the environment. There are three main initiatives implemented by Verizon to meet their corporate environmental obligations. These initiatives are: recycling, reducing energy consumption and obtaining “clean” (conflict free) resources.

The Warehouse Group Ltd is a typical half-hearted company that does not do what it preaches in the area of Corporate Social Responsibility. From the Warehouse Annual Report and Social and Environment Report 2009, I found that the company is not only focusing on its financial performance, but also on social and environmental external effects. A critical analysis of this reporting practice suggests that the Warehouse is not truly responsible socially and environmentally but more a public relation exercise of the company.

This assessment is about analysing the management of two different companies Macquarie group of services and David Jones. Both got many similarities and differences between their organisational structure and management. They also work with a vision in market from many years. There values and aims are pretty different from each other. In present days, both companies are doing a great business in their fields, so the management of both companies have high responsibilities. They have thousands of stakeholders, which convert these companies in to big firms. This simply means, more complex task for managers.

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in its most simple of terms is a vision. More specifically, it is a vision that in a way almost minimizes what may be better for a company’s shareholders and investors, and increases its focus on things including the environment, its employees, its role in benefiting the surrounding communities and society, and more importantly making sure that we can continue to grow, thrive, and be self-sustaining. In short, it is a business model that puts an emphasis on the future over its profits. CSR comes from an evolving view that current and future generations deem it unacceptable for businesses and corporations to conduct business under a blanket of secrecy. All the written, and unwritten laws concerning competition as well as sustainability are being rewritten.

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a concept that means, when an enterprise generates profits and takes legal obligations to its shareholders and creditors, it should also be socially responsible for other stakeholders, such as employees, customers, community and the environment in which it operates. CSR encourages enterprises not only to pay attention to profits accumulation while operating, but also to make a contribution to consumers, the environment in which it operates as well as the whole of society.

When we place our first step into the world of business, we have heard businessmen speak expressively about the aim of the company is to make profit and not to address social responsibilities. This is only certain truth to this statement as the world we live in now is evolving. People in the current era are more concern about social responsibility especially with corporations and their behaviours and plans. There is an increasing demand on businesses to have a “social conscience” and taking serious responsibility for providing employment, eliminating discrimination, ethical working environment and whatever else is related to having a “social conscience”.

The above lines epitomize the soul of the National Survey on corporate social responsibility - Corporate Social Responsibility Practices in India. Times Foundation, the corporate social responsibility wing of the Bennett, Coleman & CO. Ltd., in partnership with TNS India and IRRAD undertook a national survey to understand the underlying dynamics of CSR and the current situation in India. They found out that lack of understanding, inadequately trained personnel, non availability of authentic data and specific information on the kinds of CSR activities,

affect the outcome is too small to make voting worthwhile, even if they know that a

‘Corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) means that the firm has wider responsibilities in relation to objectives and people apart from the owners or shareholders (Beal and Goyen 2005). These responsibilities are achieved when the firm adapts all of its practices to ensure that it operates in ways that meet, or exceed, the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business. Objectives often associated with CSR include a responsibility to manage natural assets sustainably and not to pollute by chemical discharge, smell, noise, dust or other irritants; fair treatment of employees and ethical attitude towards clients. The other people include employees, customers, suppliers,