According, to the European Commission (2013), Corporate Social Responsibility and competitiveness link in the way that it brings ‘benefits in terms of risk management, cost savings and access to capital’ (European Commission, 2013). However Milton Freidman (1970) defines CSR within his essay in the New York Times as ‘The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits’. He also states that businesses such as IKEA should ‘make as much money as possible, while conforming to the basic rules of society, both those embodied in the law and those embodied in ethical custom’ (May et al., 2007). It is evidenced that Friedman’s definition has conflicted with (Kotler and Lee, 2005) who delineate CSR as ‘commitment to improve well-being …show more content…
Therefore it reveals that as a substitute for connecting relationships with smaller suppliers, IKEA actively engages and maintains long-term working relationships with their diverse suppliers. It is made clear that IKEA centres its focus on purchasing from outside (Anderson and Larsen, 2009). Assisting suppliers helps motivate them whilst becoming more responsible for ‘people and the environment’ (Inter IKEA Systems B.V, 2012g). CSR can have positive effects upon IKEA (Wang, 2008) in terms of stakeholders needs being satisfied and the public believing in the company due to environmentally friendly treatment. These factors will help IKEA differentiate from Argos and B&Q. Blowfield and Murray (2008) mention that the increase in CSR public awareness, has led to businesses understanding that CSR plays a key role in their overall strategy and growth. Consequently, in order to strengthen the supplier working relationship, IKEA has transformed from demanding ‘a certain level of quality, service, price and environmental and social responsibility’ to cultivating these factors (Anderson and Larsen, 2009). The benefit of the transformational change for IKEA is that cost savings are attained and there is appropriate conditions to help produce proficiently. The IKEA Way delineates what supplier’s expectations are of IKEA and vice versa in terms of the environment, child labour and working conditions (Anderson and
* IKEA’s low cost structure has been the very core of its success. It’s low-cost and high-quality strategy fits with the current state of the economy. Offering convenience factors within IKEA’s stores would fit well with IKEA’s low cost structure. It maintains its low-cost business model by creating a different furniture shopping experience. IKEA supplies customers with all possible materials needed to complete their shopping when they enter the store (that are, measuring
IKEA does a lot of effort to implement their new company’s strategy for 2020, so called, Positive & Planet Positive Strategy. In spite of IKEA’s commitment to human rights, it is difficult for them to control their entire global supply chain. IKEA with other of retailers, were lighted on having suppliers in India which employ labor. However, IKEA declares that those proves were found in carpets producer from India from only four suppliers. (Max Ebnother, 2014)
This paper aims to demonstrate a detailed description of the elements of ‘IKEA’ company based on its famous name in the furniture industry.
The purpose of this essay is to research the notion of CSR and uncover its true framework and outline what social responsibility truly means to corporate organisations, and whether it should be seriously considered to be a legitimate addition to the corporate framework of an organisation.
The services and products offered by IKEA provide value to its customers in various ways. For one, the products and services are very affordable. The products and services are not priced highly and therefore, the average customer can enjoy them. At the same time, the products are of high quality. From IKEA’s slogan “low prices but not at any price”, it is clear that the company prices its products lowly but that does not mean that the quality is compromised. IKEA satisfying its customer’s needs through providing them value for their money as they provide quality products that will last for a long time, and at affordable costs. The fact that the company has set the minimum acceptable standards for its wood, implies that it is also keen on quality and on the environmental impact of its action of making furniture ( Edvardsson, Enquist & Hay, 2006).
Strategic alliances could reduce the complexity of logistics if IKEA is able to find a reliable partner in this field.
The case I will analyze and discuss in this case study is “IKEA’s Global Sourcing Challenge: Indian Rugs and Child Labor”. I will begin with the vision, values, and strategy of IKEA and an internal analysis of the issues that they have faced as of the time of the case. Next, I will detail the issues IKEA faced in the years prior to the Indian rugs and child labor challenge. Then I will describe the Indian rug and child labor problem that IKEA faced
IKEA is rumored to be a very standardized retailer, i.e., a certain set of marketing strategies is used that are the same around the world. This indeed sets IKEA, operating on markets in Europe, US as well as Asia and Australia, apart among international retailers. Often the theoretical conclusions in international
IKEA is a worldwide expanded company. They enlarge their showrooms to North America, Europe, Australia and Asia. Customers can check out IKEA’s product in the show rooms and also by checking out IKEA’s websites to get their selected products to be home delivered. This is an effective way of selling their products as customers who are busy with their own work can purchase their preferred
IKEA is the largest furniture chain in the world, and in 2011 the Swedish company operated over 270 stores in 25 countries. In 2011 IKEA sales soared to over $35 billion, or over 20% of the global furniture market. Most of its stuffs believed IKEA will massive growth throughout the world in the coming decade because IKEA could provide what customer wanted: good design, and good made contemporary furniture with an affordable price. In one word, IKEA’s global approach focuses on simplicity, attention to detail, cost consciousness, and responsiveness in every aspect of its operations and behavior. (Jones, 2013)
IKEA also based on low cost to achieve hybrid strategy. Big items are all flat-packed that the customers transported and assembled themselves. This saves IKEA with shipping costs from suppliers and delivery costs to customers so that they can pass this benefit to customers through low price. In the stores, there are no armies of sales staffs. Customers are providing with tape measures and pencils so that they can self-served. This reducing the number of sales staff required. IKEA encourages customers to create value for themselves by taking on certain tasks traditionally done by the retailers and their low expectation on service levels keeps costs down. Additionally, IKEA choose most economical suppliers over traditional suppliers around the world. The company buys great volume of materials from suppliers to get the economies of scale. Since the labour in UK is expensive, their products are produced in
At the outset, it may be useful to characterise IKEA in terms of the characteristics of demand (also known as the four Vs, see Slack et al. p 20). First, IKEA is clearly a high volume operation – as indeed most international retailers are – which lends to systematising operations but which implies capital intensive processes and therefore cost considerations will be crucial. Second, IKEA offers a large number of products (up to 14000 depending on the country/store) so there is high variety in the
4. What is IKEA’s strategy toward suppliers? How important is this strategy to IKEA’s success?
IKEA has adapted to the operations function of a business. This function is the main function of every company. This key function, of which IKEA has adapted to, is the business function responsible for managing the process of creation of goods and services. The operations function is responsible for organising, coordinating, planning, and controlling the resources that are required in the production of goods and services. IKEA has effectively implemented this function by understanding the needs of customers. In particular, this applies to those who have a lower income, and/or, limited space. IKEA’s employees within the product design and product development departments, focus directly on the price and quality, as well as the design and function of products. Elements of the design are typically agreed on within the factory itself, this is where manufacturers and designers work together, to create a product with regard to the greatest use of raw materials and manufacturing opportunities. IKEA’s operations have proved effective as in 2013 it earned $35.5 billion. IKEA has a large amount of suppliers, greater than 1300. IKEA purchases most of their
CSR can improve the company’s reputation and branding and this in turn improves the prospects for the company to be more effective to attract new customers and increase market share.