Correlation Between Ethical Police Leadership And Corruption Essay

Are police ever justified in committing illegal acts that violate others rights are they ever justified especially when there is no personal gain but for reasons that may seem to be about a higher purpose. This is the argument for noble cause corruption. This idea brings it to the end justifies the means thinking. If we start down this line where can it lead us? The idea that we can justify any action that would violate civil rights and other laws because we feel that our cause is noble and it is not being done for personal gain but the good of others can lead us into some dark places. The noble cause thinking is

In order for a Police agency to prevent and deter Police misconduct, there must be a definition to what actions and behaviors that the term will encompass. The term ‘police corruption’ has been used to describe many activities: bribery; violence and brutality; fabrication and destruction of evidence; racism; favoritism or nepotism. Many different scholars differ in their own examples of the definition. Before attempting to the question of whether a precise definition is possible, it is worth examining the range of activities that might be included within a broad discussion of corruption. In (Bayley and Perito, 2011), it is defined as police corruption is a contested phrase with narrow and broad meanings. Narrowly

The Criminal Justice System is just like every other agency or corporation ever. Police integrity and ethics are fundamental to effective policing and helps with building trust within communities. Sound conduct by police improves the community interactions, enhances communication, and promotes shared responsibility for addressing crime and disorder. (USDOJ, 2014) Restoring ethics starts from the beginning, and that is too look harder into the employees or officers that you are going to hire. The thing is that it is much harder than it sounds. People can change or lie on their interviews. So you will never be able to fully prevent every person who might break ethical codes from entering into law enforcement. What you need to do first is let all new officers be aware of what they are getting themselves into.

I like your analogy of validity and reliability. It is very critical that the reliability and validity of the data collection tools that are used in qualitative research are validated because of the outcome of the research results. If the data tools are not valid, it could have a negative impact to the outcome of patients such as a treatment or drug that is being researched. The probability of harming a patient is high if a new treatment is incorrect.

In order to be able to class a research method as reliable, it must produce consistent results each time it is used. The exact same results will not be obtained each time as participants and situations vary, but a similarity between the results of the same test will indicate reliability.

Research is a vital role to ensure the growth of psychology. There are several different types of research methods that a researcher may choose. Regardless which kind of research method is selected it’s likely that they will need a form of measurement for reliability. Having an effective measuring tool is essential to produce valid research findings. The wrong type of measurement can skew data, cause possible unethical actions, and be an overall severe threat to the validity and reliability of the research. When conducting research, researchers should only utilize the measurements that are credible through evidence-based practice (EBP). We can measure reliability in several ways; we present the four most common methods: (1) test–retest, (2) alternate forms, (3) internal consistency, and (4) interrater reliability (Thomas & Hersen, 2011, pg.30).

Within the past few weeks of my social statistics class I have had the amazing opportunity of learning about various validities and data’s. The three validities in which I learned about were, internal, external and construct. I will explain these validities as well as experimental data and their usefulness in the world. Lastly, I will explain how one of these data could be useful to me in resolving an issue that I may meet in life.

Construct validity has to do with establishing correct operational measures for the concepts being studied (Yin 2009, p. 40). Yin (2009), writes that researchers can improve construct validity construct validity can be if multiple sources of data is employed (triangulation of data), establishing chain of evidence, and reviewing the report with their informants (p. 41). In making sure that one can draw a meaning and useful inferences from scores on particular instruments of data collection and to demonstrate the accuracy of their findings, Creswell (2013) also advice the use of member checking and triangulating data (p. 201). Quarm (2009) and Sarquah (2008) both used several data sources (interviews, documents, media, and internet) in

Research requires a dependable measurement. The measurement are reliable to the extent they are repeatable and that any random influence which tends to make measurements different occasion to occasion is a source of measurement error. So retest, equivalent forms and split-half reliability are determined through correlation.

The meaning of our study rests on how we objectively observe the construct or behavior of interest. Thus, developing a reliable and valid set of procedures for measuring our variables is crucial for the

(b) Researchers must ensure the reliability and validity of research data as far as reasonably possible when designing research methodologies and instruments and in the collection, processing and analysis of research data.

Data and information will be collected and recorded to ensure reliability and validity of the research result. Measurement is at the core of doing research (Santayana, 2011). The progress of doing research is measured by its quantity, not its quality (Santayana, 2011). Collecting enough data is advisable since after measurement some of the data would be discredited.

Reliability is defined, within psychometric testing, as the stability of a research study or measure(s). Reliability can be examined externally, Inter-rater and Test-Retest, as well as internally; which is seen in internal consistency reliability methods.

First and foremost, good research must have sound methodology. The research should show clearly if the approach is qualitative or quantitative, or mixed methods. There are many different approaches to collecting data.

This research method can be valid and reliable as it primarily relies on the measurement device or instrument applied.