Correlations Cause Crime

Biological factors alone are not a sufficient reason why crime occurs. An example would be looking at testosterone and adult deviance. Most studies have shown no correlation with circulating testosterone and behavior. However, there is significance to examining biological factors. The answer lies in the fact that biological explanations of crime understate the important role of social conditions. (Conklin, p 93). When looking at biological and social combined, there is a moderately strong relationship between testosterone and social integration while growing up. Social integration can be fragmented due to less social opportunities by being in lower-class status, unmarried, and an unstable work history. (Conklin, p 96).

Looking at the nightly news, many would believe violent crimes are at an all-time high. There is no longer just one on one violent crimes or gang violent crimes. There are court shootings, school shootings, church shootings, theater shootings, mall shootings, workplace shootings, and others. Most one on one crime is committed with an illegal gun; whereas most mass shootings are done with handguns that are purchased legally. Although, violent crimes reported on the nightly news is hard to hear or see. It has become very common to encounter this information on a daily basis. The numbers seem to be overwhelming; statistics share violent crimes are at an all-time low. While the numbers of crimes are decreasing, gun ownership

Correlation is usually when two things tend to happen together at the same time and causation is something happens because of something else. I think it is harder to prove causation because

One may avoid negativity for any kind of reason. One may be distressed by it, or perhaps one may find negativity traumatizing to their emotions. Whatever it may be, some people attempt to dodge any sort of negativity. The topic of my independent novel serves to not only challenge the idea of avoiding any kind of depressing news, but to bring light to new ways of thinking that humanity should adopt should we want to understand the roots of crime. Furthermore, we should use our knowledge of these roots to prevent crime.

Answer: A positive correlation means that increases in the value of one variable are associated

There are many perspectives in which one can analyze and understand why a person decides to commit a crime. Some perspectives are social learning theory, strain theory, classical and rational choice theory, deterrence theory, biological and psychological positivist theories, among others. However, for the purposes of this paper, the biological and psychological theories will be discussed.

The aim of this essay is to compare, contrast and evaluate two sociological theories of crime causation and two psychological theories of crime causation.

Theories of crime causation get to the fundamental characteristics of human nature. Theories of crime causation can be separated into trait theories and choice theories. Both types of theories make valid points about the causes of crime, yet they are have different implications for preventing the causes of crime. Thesis: Trait theories and choice theories both assume that humans are self-interested, but their conceptions of self-interest limit the applicability of each to certain types of crime. Trait theories appear more suited for explaining the causes of violent crime, whereas choice theories are more appropriate to property crimes or economic crimes.

The title, Vitamins Cause Crime, falls under the Correlation Vs. Causation Fallacy. The Correlation Vs. Causation Fallacy is defined as making an assumption because one variable is associated with another. Take for example, both variables A, and B. A may cause B, and B may cause A. However, there is another variable that may cause both A and/or B – it is C. In the case of the newspaper’s article, vitamins may not cause crime rates, rather an option such as a particular mental health problem requires use of certain vitamins, but because of this mental health problem, these types of individuals have a higher risk of committing a crime. Additionally, its even possible vitamins have no association with

Almost half of the 83,000 people in prison ran away from home as a child and cannot read as well as an 11 year old. Almost 30 per cent have been through the care system and similar proportions were homeless before entering prison.

The reason that the title "Vitamins cause crime" is wrong is because of a few reasons. The title is said as if the only thing that causes crimes are vitamins and nothing else. Also the article may not be replicated by other studies to prove that vitamins are a cause for crime. People could also fall for the illusory correlation, where people see a statistical association that may not exist. By using a double blind experiment, there would not be a worry about confirmation bias from the researcher and the subject would not change his or her expectations because he is blind to the experiment. The subjects would be put into two random groups and would either get the vitamin or not. The researcher would not know either who is getting the vitamins

The title of the aforementioned article is clearly an exaggeration of a study, additionally it is relying on fear mongering. This article title is clearly a prime example of “correlation versus causation”. This means that just because two variables are correlating, it does not mean that one of the variables causes the other. In this specific case it relies on the positive correlation also being caused by each other. This is clearly not the case. A large number of people take vitamins, they don’t have negative side effects and generally people have taken some form of vitamin at some point in their life. Therefore because of the large number of people who have taken vitamins, it is likely that when compared to any other set of statistics that

Crime is a social construct because it is an idea that is established by a society to control the behaviors of the people within the society (“Radical Concept of Crime”). What is considered to be criminal varies within different area and cultures and even time. Things that were legal two hundred years ago are illegal now. For example, in the 18th and 19th century when slavery was allowed in America, there were a lot of people who saw nothing wrong with it because they had been socialized to accept and justify it. If you ask most Americans now about slavery, they would say that it was a tragedy or that they just cannot understand how it happened. This is because we are now being socialized to think of slavery as wrong. Even though many citizens

A double blind study would help the validity of the experiement and help determine if vitamins cause crime. To design a double blind study I would not inform the subjects what was being tested for and the experimenters would not know which group was the control group of the experimental group to help eliminate any biases. Participants should be randomly assigned to different conditions

Biological theory states that the individual will have certain traits will be transmitted from parent to children through genetics and not from social learning. Along with the juvenile having similar facial characteristics, which some believe also predisposes them to criminal behavior (Palmerin, 2012).