Corruption In Martin Luther's Open Letter To The Christian Nobility

Martin Luther is known as the man who fought the Catholic church. The man who exposed the church of committing unjust practices. The man who kick started the protestant reformation. The man who founded the Lutheran church. Martin Luther was many things, but he was not the man who planned to destroy Catholicism. The Reformation changed the religious climate in Europe by introducing ideas that were the basis of the modern-day Lutheranism.

Martin Luther knew that it was wrong. It was wrong to make people believe that the sale of indulgences would absolve them of sins. He realized that people who ran the Church were corrupt and money hungry. “It is said that contrition is not necessary in those who purchase souls [out of purgatory] or buy confessionalia”. Luther wanted people to understand that buying confessionalia along with letters of indulgences would not free their souls from purgatory, it would just be giving the Church more money. He believed that people should learn the Gospel and love of Christ and that Christ would never preach indulgence. “Though it is the first and the sole duty of all bishops that the people should learn the Gospel and the love of Christ, for Christ

Martin Luther started the Protestant Reformation when he nailed his 95 theses to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany on October 31, 1517. It contained a series of 95 complaints that the once monk had with the church. He was steadfast in his efforts to get the church to change. Even refusing to repeal his complaints when threatened with excommunication.

The earliest most famous Protestant reformer, Martin Luther went to the school of Erfurt to study law in 1501, but he quickly became more interested in theology. Luther was exposed to recent humanist writings and read extensively in classical Latin, Greek, and Hebrew. In 1505, he enrolled in an Augustinian monastery. He spent a decade educating and preaching and visited Rome. The Reformation was a religious uprising in Europe in the 16th century, prompted by dissatisfaction with the set Roman Catholic Church, which directed to the formulation of the Protestant branch of Christianity.

Catholic leaders believed they were defending traditional Christian civilization against rebellions and anarchical forces, whilst the latter argued they were restoring pure religion and defending against corruption and superstition. To them, the Pope was anti-Christ, whilst to the Catholics, Luther, Alvin and all other ‘reformers’ were heretics. Consequently, the secular rulers sought to base their political unity upon that of a religious nature, using their authority to compel their subjects into adopting one form of Christianity. In contrast to Pope Leo X, who face the Lutheran revolt, who urged secular leaders to suppress Protestant heretics by force, Luther appealed for this same force to be used against Catholics, and even Calvin, considered to be an apostle of religious tolerance didn’t permit Catholics to reside in Geneva. Meanwhile, Spain, Portugal and Italy all used methods such as the Inquisition and the Index to eliminate religious dissent and persecute Protestant subjects. Therefore, this shows that despite the argument regarding whether England was ‘torn apart’, the rest of Europe was considerably so, which could subsequently have impacted England.

Heiko Oberman’s book, Luther: Man between God and the Devil, explores Martin Luther’s life, theology and legacy. Oberman does not simply focus on Luther’s actions and behaviors as a Reformer, nor does he evaluate Luther from a purely Protestant or Catholic point of view. Instead, the book examines Luther’s continual battle with the Devil. In order to truly understand Luther, it is important “to grasp the man in his totality-with head and heart” (Oberman, 1989, xix). Luther is not merely a monk, professor, heretic or a reformer, but he was a man who 's spiritual struggle with the Devil deeply affected his life, as well as the Church.

During the diet of worms Luther was asked to take back all of his writings, His writing had included stuff the church liked, they wanted him to recant it all though. Luther refused to take back his writings and left. Luther was then going to travel back to Wittenberg when Charles V to declared Luther as an outlaw. Luther's way back to Wittenberg Frederick kidnapped him and brought him to the Wartburg castle to keep him safe from Charles V and his men

In the early fifteenth century Martin Luther appealed to Pope Leo X to settle the Indulgence Controversy. This controversy extended far beyond the original appeal. It hosted a wide spectrum of theological debates concerning doctrine, the sacraments, abuse of authority within the clergy and many other essential issues of the Church. These issues required answers, the demand for moral reform. At all levels the Church was experiencing moral lapses that caused the people to lose trust in the Church and the clergy. A deep dissatisfaction and skepticism was widespread throughout the Church. Luther original request, extended far beyond struggles within the Roman Catholic, to an unofficial permission giving recognition to all those who follow. Of our rights and obligation to bring forth

In Martin Luther’s To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation, Luther writes to the German princes on the three walls that the Catholic Church uses to defend themselves from reform. Luther attacks all three walls for the power it gives to the Pope. His attack of the second wall, that only the pope can interpret scripture, is a tenant of Luther’s theology. The Lutheran belief of Sola Scriptura holds that only Scripture should be the source of all Christian practices, rather than doctrines declared by popes or other teaching authorities. While the second wall reflects a legitimate belief of Luther’s theology, Luther writes on this topic to the german nobility because it is politically beneficial towards himself, his movement, and the princedoms of Germany, not necessarily for religious reasons. These political motives are illustrated when studying the relationship between the church, the princes, and the Holy Roman Empire in Germany at the time, Luther’s response to the Peasant Revolt of 1525, and the scholars of The Church at the time.

My thoughts on the Luther article was that everything that was said in it was true and I felt accurate. There are plenty of people who struggle with reading and I think that it's our jobs as teachers to help the students who struggle with reading instead of pretending like it's not an issue. Especially in other contents, I think that it's very important to help and consider student's needs and give them practice of reading. I didn't know that technically students should be fluent readers by the end of third grade, but through the statistics that the article shares, there were similar percentages when comparing students who were below basic level to proficient level. This is very eye-opening to me because I think that it's something that needs to improve in education to help students fluent reading that they can begin to enjoy instead of hating.

Key Statement: “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Therefore anyone that lives in the USA can never be considered an outsider anywhere within the bounds.

While Martin Luther is most notable for his 95 Theses, his Letter to German Nobility is more powerful and elaborative in his argument against the teachings of Roman Catholic Church. Martin Luther writes a letter to the German nobility pleading to end all affiliation with the Roman Catholic Church. In his letter, Martin Luther expresses that nothing is received in return for all the money Germany sends to Rome and that the money is spent “fruitlessly”. After his attempt to directly attack the Church through the 95 Theses failed, Martin Luther wrote to the German people in attempt to cut ties with the injustice Church. Martin Luther’s letter effectively able to provide concrete examples and solutions in which how the German nobility should further proceed in their involvement with the Roman Catholic Church.

Due to the immense corruption throughout the catholic church, countless people demanded change. Many historians argue that the reformation’s first big break, was when Martin Luther posted The Disputation on the Power and Efficacy of Indulgences on the front doors of the Wittenberg Castle Church on October 31, 1517 as an act of defiance. It wasn’t until 1521 when Luther formally presented the 95 theses to Charles V in a church meeting also known as a “diet”. Soon after, Charles V declares Martin Luther an outlaw, and he is excommunicated under the pope’s orders. The Roman Catholic Church felt threatened by Luther’s reform plans because his beliefs went against the church's authorities.

with his 95 Theses. A strict father who most likely did not accept “no” as an

The attendant effects of Martin Luther’s reformation in the early period of the sixteenth century occasioned by his posting of the 95 theses that raised objections to some of the then prevalent practices of the Roman Catholic Church eventually led to a significant breakaway from the church of a relatively more liberal Christian sect known as the “Protestant”. It is worthy of note however that the Roman Catholic Church tried albeit unsuccessfully to placate the breakaway by instituting a “counter-Reformation” but this only achieved a cleansing of the church internally without achieving much in its most important mandate to prevent the protestant breakaway. Consequently, Europe was enmeshed in bloody religious war largely between forces loyal to the papacy in Rome and those who sympathized with the runaway protestant movement. As a result, the Roman Catholic Church invariably began to lose its pole position in the scheme of things in an already divided Europe.