Corwin Corporation Case Analysis

A case concerning monopolies and the Court’s first antitrust case. In 1982, American Sugar Refining Company entered into agreements that allowed it to take over the four Pennsylvania refineries, including E.C. Knight Company, which would give American Sugar absolute control of 98 percent of the U.S. sugar refining business. The federal government sued to break the acquisition agreements because the agreement allows the sugar companies to operate as a monopoly in restraint of trade in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The United States argued that the federal government can prohibit monopolies and set aside agreements that have created them in order to allow most Americans to enjoy

Non Availability of in house telecommunications Engg Expertise at JBC which makes them completely dependent on Postal/Nortel which again leads to Risky Situation as far as Short term span of the Project is considered.

The Rose Company is building a new plant to reduce cost, improve the quality of products, and maintain competitive leadership by gaining a slight production advantage. The main obstacles to be overcome are the commissioning of a new plant, new methods and process, and administrative reporting issues. As the newly hired General Plant Manager, I plan to resolve these issues by insisting that all plant communications flow through me, instituting training for plant personnel and setting operational expectations.

One more integral factor which led to the failure of this outsourcing was the lack of leadership and commitment for the project from both the ends. Tegan did not show its commitment to the project because first, it failed to deploy adequate expertise to facilitate the review

“The writing in this essay is my own work. If I have used outside sources, I have acknowledged them through correct documentation.”

Siam Cement’s offer to purchase an initial order of 200 units at $9,000 per unit, would lead to a net profit of $200,000. While this immediate cash influx may seem advantageous in the short term, it will not offset yearly operational expenses of $250,000 (See Exhibit 1). Additionally, accepting Siam Cement’s offer would position Rubbertech as an Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM). This decision could impede potential growth that would far exceed the offer that is currently on the table. If Rubbertech does not accept Siam Cement’s offer, they can seize a part of

Ans: In this situation, the failure is due to many reasons ranging from unclear or poor performance of team. In this we should not blame any individual. It may be due to lack of analyzing the customer requirements. For any project to be successful the team should work co-ordination manner.

The Wilkerson Company is in the business of manufacturing valves, pumps, and flow controllers to sell to companies that manufacture water purification equipment. The company started out with a very unique and more efficient way of designing the valves and it was better than any of the other competition that also made valves. And this actually helped them establish a loyal customer base since they were so innovative and had the best quality at the time. They are looking for help since they are having issues with the decline in their company’s profits. The company wants to figure out exactly how and why their profits are as low as they are by reaching out to their controller and manufacturing manager. They want to seek additional help and

At first, identifying the potential problems. Though I will pay more attention to the top three classical problems, it is necessary to analyze other potential problems in specific project by investigating similar IT projects that is “Failure” or “Success” before kicking off project. The “similar” can be explained in many aspects, such as same goals, cost, scope, same industry, background and so on. I need to investigate how such similar project fails. For example, we assume that a company want to launch an ERP projects recently. In this area, there are many companies did it before. Failure of high-profile ERP projects is common. In order to avoid mistakes that usually occurs in such IT project, it can investigate many failure projects, such as Airforce, Saudi Telecom and so on. The project failure of Airforce due to the following reasons: weak teamwork & composition and lack of top management support. The Saudi Telecom’s failure attributes to lack of top management support, inadequate of company culture, and huge system customization (Aldammas & Al-Mudimigh, 2011). As you

Carlson Companies, a private company known for its existence in marketing, business, leisure travel, and the hospitality industries, has over 180,000 employees across the United States. Carlson Shared Services, the Information Technology (IT) division, provides services to its internal clients and thus must support a wide range of applications and services. In 2002, the IT division decided to implement a storage area network (SAN) that in turn would meet the six (6) goals established in order to meet the needs of a growing company.

* unity of purpose and focus under a common corporate strategy (further supporting the firm’s strategy as it relates to acquisitions and divestitures);

Honicker Corporation is a USA based, successful dashboard manufacturer. It has opportunities for international expansion, but due to the ultraconservative culture it did not happened until they faced a change in management in 2009. Honicker was a rich company, and to expand, they took the short road and acquired four companies around the world: Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta. There were two commonalities among these companies: they serviced mainly in their own geographical area, and senior management knew their geographical culture and hold good reputation with their stakeholders.

Next, you find that all of the salespeople are paid a straight salary, and all receive exactly the

The project did not achieve desirable standards as far as customer requirements, scope, environment and execution were concerned. It was important that the project integrators to ensure customers do not escalate during the implementation of the project, being the first adopters of the software FoxMeyer should have exercised caution by adopting the software in phases rather than implementing the project directly, furthermore, execution was the biggest problem, despite knowing that the project needed skilled personnel FoxMeyer did not train staff during the early stages of the project and had to rely on consultants. Finally the company should have gained control over the project from the start to ensure that all the staff and management were involved but in this case despite knowing that the project would not work as envisaged the management did not take control or stop the implementation of the project.

Lack of project management clarity: the planning activity had lot of material but lacked content, clear action items and lack of consensus on the milestones. The difficulties in the project only increased with time and a more performance driven style would have kept things on track if introduced early on.