Cost-Quality Relationship Memo

The cost of quality in a manufacturing process and environment are many as you are aware. But the 3 primary costs that we should review on a more regular basis to assure we are creating the most cost effective and quality products are the following: Appraisal, Prevention and Failure, and failure costs should be looked at as internal failure and external failure.

Product production comes with many types of costs. Four of the most common costs are prevention costs, appraisal costs, internal failure costs and external failure costs. These four costs are called quality costs and are costs that all businesses that produce products will pay. The amount of money that will go to each cost is dependent on the amount spent on the other costs. In other words, an increase in one type of cost can result in a decrease in another. Businesses need to understand the nature of each cost in order to understand for which cost to budget.

Given the highly competitive nature of today’s markets we as a company must provide high quality products to survive. Quality itself has become a major competitive factor and in many ways is a contributing factor in success or failure. The intent of this memo is to identify, explain and evaluate the three types of cost associated with quality.

While we are performing our analysis on different aspects of the company, we look at the three main types of cost. When we remain devoted to improving our costs, and the faults related, we show our same devotion to our consumers. This is portrayed by the quality of products we put on the shelves. Prevention costs, appraisal costs and Failure costs are areas

There are many trade-offs for each of the decisions that a company makes within all three types of these cost types when quality consideration is used. If the company decides to put more time into training employees properly on operating machines and

Cost minimisation however, cannot be pursued without attention to quality - there must be a balance between the two

As I said on the thread discussion,The cost of quality is not the price of creating a quality product or service but the cost of not creating a quality product or service:If an organization can quantify the quality of their products and services, they can use Quality is conformance to requirements as a definition for quality. If an organization cannot quantify, they can use Quality is satisfying the needs and

The AHRQ organization has several portfolios’ that are funded and supports research projects. Such portfolios are information technology, health patient safety, prevention and care management, and value portfolios. Within these portfolio’s, grants are there to fund new projects that relate to each category. Within each portfolio, research has been started and effectiveness of these projects is underway. Some clinical research projects are a set of priority conditions of importance to the Medicaid, Medicare, and SCHIP programs. Projected initiatives are to improve quality of care. The Value portfolio finds ways to reduce unnecessary cost and waste while maintaining or improving quality without adding cost which is a critical, national need (2012, p.5).

I would like to bring to your attention three types of costs when quality considerations are made here at Acme Catsup Company. The first costs would be our failure costs. The second would be our appraisal costs. The third is the cost of prevention.

Relative costs like manufacturing price, price of raw2 materials and rate iof exchange also have a huge impact on the profitability of a firm. If the cost of producing the good is high then the profits will eventually be low.

7. Though numbers given in the cost data can not be contested, I would definitely contest the way total cost has been computed. The item 345 department operates within a large manufacturing facility that churns out number of other products too. Hence judging the profitability of item 345 on the basis of total cost is not practical.

The true variable costs to Beauregard Textiles include the Direct Labor, Material, Material Spoilage, and Direct Department Expense. By excluding those expenses not related to the production of T-30, we can calculate the contribution margin for Beauregard using unit sales price and unit variable cost. Contribution margin is a measurement of the profitability of a product and is an excellent management tool to help determine whether to keep or drop certain aspects of the business. A positive contribution margin means that the company should produce the product, a negative contribution margin means the company is likely to suffer from every unit it produces.

17.   Reducing the variations in our product or services is an important key to perceived quality TRUE

One of the hardest part about being a producer is putting items for sale at a price that the consumer will be able to afford, while at the same time making an appropriate profit. If you put the prices on items too high, then the customer will either complain about the prices or they will go and find the product somewhere else. If you put the prices on a product too low, then everyone will be able to afford it and you will make little to no profit at that rate. In selling a product, one must take multiple factors into consideration. Factors such as: if the product suits the target market, if this product is affordable by all classed-citizens, or if the profit of the product out-weighs the cost of production. Once all of these factors have been taken into consideration and have been respectively examined to the point that the product will have little to no chance of failure, only then can the marketing of a product become successful. Successful marketing is seen everywhere, but how much of a beneficial impact it makes on society is due to the success. Examining the major beneficial factors of total cost minimization for the producers, consumers, and society.

Our company should make sure that manufacturers deliver products with the highest design specification, in order to be order-winner quality conformance, by delivering products with no defects (Hill and Hill, 2012). Furthermore, improvements in quality lead to a decrease in cost for the company. According to (Evans, 1997) higher quality products lead to a decrease in costs for the company through higher productivity: ‘improvements in quality leads to lower cost because of less re-work, fewer mistakes, fewer delays and snags’ (Evans 1997, P.55).