Cotton Carr Case Study

This is a formal complaint submitted to BHP/DCA against Frank Pinelli, Quantum Developers LLC (Developer) Condominium Association: Cedar Woods Condominium Association (Board) and Jim Polos, Midlantic Property Management.

-Goodvalue did not exercise reasonable care in response to known attacks on the premises (8 reported attacks in the 18 months before the incident involving Mr

This is to invite your urgent attention to the constant garage and debris that has been accumulating on this site space 222 of Knolls Lodge Mobile Park in Torrance, California 90501 since 2014. For 2 ½ years this home has been an eye sore and a violation of the rental agreement at Knolls Lodge Mobile Park. As a result, heaps of garage, broken parts of metal, broken toys, washer and dryer, extension cords running all over the place, dry plants, car that is leaking oil on jacks, dog feces that is considered unhealthy, provides unsafe conditions and serious health hazards for the community, surrounding neighbors. I am the neighbor next door space 221 that has complaint that this resident has blocked my back door with these same obstructions

There is emphasis on the responsibility that planners must serve the interest of the public through techniques that inform and structure debates and foster understanding (OPPI, n.d.). Members should respect the diversity of needs and values of the public while providing clear and accurate information on planning matters. These sections also cover the consequences on the natural and built environment. Through the planner’s action it is evident that he has neglected the interest of the public and has put the values of the developer first by presenting limited information. The planner did not foster understanding by providing clear and accurate information. Instead the information provided was vague and was not accurately represented since affects were not covered adequately in terms of the long-term consequences. Section 2.7 to 2.9 in the CIP addresses the fact that planners are responsible for disclosing full information when possible conflict of interest arise (OPPI, n.d.). In this case the developer and their proposed development and the public and the adjacent environmentally sensitive area created a conflict of interest. the conflict of interest was that the developer wanted to develop a community that aligns with their proposed plan whereas existing residents wanted to change the proposed plan to protect the forest. Since a conflict of interest arose the planner was responsible for

In the Lucas case property was purchased on the costal area of South Carolina. When Lucas purchased the property he had the intent to build single-family homes. Under the understand of the regulation that he could not build with in three- hundred feet form the

The water company contacted the code Officer and requested him to respond to label the home as unfit for habitation. Once he arrived the individuals took the Code Officer inside and said he couldn't post it because they still have water. The water company then realized Randy Smith had a line connecting a water line from 306 W Chester St to 304 W Chester St. Both properties had the water valve shut off until the violation was corrected.

Furthermore, it was found that the prohibition of use was a deprivation of any reasonable use for the parcels and eliminated the unrestricted right of use resulting in the parcels being rendered valueless. Lastly, the court determined that the parcels had in fact been “taken” by the Act and ordered that Lucas be paid just compensation in the amount of just over $1.2 million. Required compensation encompasses that the property owner to suffer a physical “invasion” of his property as well as denies all economically beneficial or productive use of land. The Supreme Court of South Carolina ruled that when regulations are in place to “prevent serious public harm”, id. at 383, 404 S.E.2d at 899, just compensation is not owed under the Takings Clause despite effect on property value. The court was unable to back the statue that construction of the two lots would threaten he public resource. Id. at 383, 404 S.E.2d at 898. The court reasoned that any regulations that deny a property owner of viable economic use of land constitutes regulatory deprivation requiring compensation. Due to Lucas having to sacrifice all economically beneficial uses for a common good and must leave the property useless then the owner had suffered a taking. It was argued that the owner’s view of deprivation of all economically beneficial use constitutes a deprivation in the

I responded to Trojan Commons Apartment B1 in reference to a damage to property call. Upon arrival, I made contact with Courtney Doolittle. Doolittle stated that when she arrived at her residence this afternoon, she noticed the door had shoe prints on it. When Doolittle opened the door, I observed the foot prints located on the door and structure of the door had been damaged, as someone tried to gain entry. Myself and Doolittle walked through the apartment to see if anything was missing. Doolittle stated that nothing was missing at this time. I advised Doolittle if she noticed anything missing, to call Troy Police Department. Doolittle stated that this damaged had to be done between Thanksgiving Day and today, before she arrived to the

Defendant SARAH MINER (hereinafter “Ms. Miner,”) owner, and operator of the Portola complex, recently denied Plaintiff DARLAWILLIAMS’ (hereinafter “Plaintiff,”) a former tenant, application to continue leasing at the complex. As such, Plaintiff brought several suits (Exhibit 1) against Ms. Miner, alleging discrimination as the basis for her denial. The Plaintiff's case against Ms. Miner, however, is without merits. Plaintiff received several noise complaints (Exhibit 2) throughout her tenancy, disrupting the peaceful residential community. Moreover, Plaintiff failed to keep her unit in good condition, resulting in considerable damage to the unit and property.

The dishes in the kitchen sink where stacked nearly a foot tall. The kitchen counters had miscellaneous tools, junk and trash stacked all over it to where there was not any visible counter space. There were piles of laundry approximately two feet tall and three feet in diameter, clean and dirty, in the kitchen and the laundry room but I was unable to differentiate between the two. The kitchen and dining floor, which was white tile, was mostly black with what appeared to be and smelled like animal feces but the Dunn’s stated this was mud from the driveway. I advised the Dunn’s that they should clean the residence and that I would follow up in a couple of days. The Dunn’s assured me the residence would be cleaned in a day. I

This new power to close a premises consists of a closure notice and a closure order. The closure notice can be issued by the police or local authority, out of court, if it is satisfied that the use of a premises has resulted, or is likely to result in, nuisance to the public. A closure notice can also

“Whereas the Schedule of Standard Strata Bylaws states approval must be obtained before making changes to any common strata property, including doors, windows, skylights, and grounds, it was moved by President Rictus and seconded by Vice President Pindy that Mr. Andrew Morris be ordered to remove his new skylight at his own expense, pending approval by the strata council, and that Mrs. Janice Guest be ordered to remove the wreath hanging on her front door, as well as the rose bushes she has planted to each side of

Fly tipping is a major public safety issue in Welwyn/Hatfield. I attended an incident where discarded house waste was dumped in the road. I immediately searched and recovered evidence from the scene and arranged for it to be safely removed. I searched through rubbish and identified an address to start an investigation by finding a diary and other supporting documentation. I identified an address and established that it was a builder who had carried out work at the next door neighbour’s house who was paid to remove items from both houses. I secured statements and photographs of the ‘tip’ and the offenders details given by the occupants. I accurately identified the offender through PNC and ANPR work, resulting in the offender being invited

1. Is it unethical for a company to intentionally understate its earnings? Why or why not?

In the days to come, this is a great opportunity for the families and families that are to come. If we miss this opportunity now, there is no guarantee that another corporation will not come in and put something in that will not destroy the land and place something that will be even worse for the town of Beatty. This is guaranteed to be a safe and effective plan for the town, proven by the EPA to be safer than previous practices. Henderson would need to be concerning that the land is important and that is not what they want to do but to be rewarding for the state and the town of Beatty there is no other choice.