preview

Counter Argumentative Essay On The Armenian Genocide

Good Essays

Armenian Genocide

Most know about the horrific and shameful acts of violence against the Jewish during World War II. It is taught and studied in world history classes within every country. However, many have not heard of the Armenian Genocide. It is still a debated and controversial topic. Against what all documents and witnesses who have survived show and tell, the Turkish government still denies the existence of this terrible event. This act of ignorance is highly irresponsible and insulting towards the survivors of this horrible event. By accepting the existence of such shameful act, the new Republic of Turkey can move forward and fix their foreign affairs with opposite parties.
Although the Turkish government claims that the Armenian …show more content…

Even though there are several documents found including plans for the act, military journals, and documents of payments that were made by the government to the local mobs, which all clearly state the government involvement with attacks on Armenians that were either fleeing their own houses in fear of their lives or in the safety of their own homes, Turkish government representatives deny any government involvement. They state that it was done by radical subject Turkish people which were executed once they were found guilty. While there are records of executions of Turkish radicals during the time period, the Turkish government denies any access to those records which in turn damages their credibility. Another counter argument made by the Turkish government is that the Armenians that were slain by military officers or mobs hired by the government were Armenians that sympathized with Russia, and carried on espionage and plans to hinder the Ottoman Empire. While that argument stays true through the beginning of this genocide act, the records show the displacement of nearly a hundred thousand Armenians and the death of eighty thousand more (UTEG). Clearly the numbers just do not add up and even if they did, both of the statements made by Turkish government officials, can not be true at the same time. One statement accepts the involvement of the government, while another strictly states there was no government involvement. This denial of violence and ignorance from Turkish representatives goes on to help prove the existence of the terrible act since the lack of credibility and consistency of official statements is clear as

Get Access