Court Script Analysis

wrongful-death suit swiftly discovered that they were on hand to bear witness to something else” (Golab,

Andrew Beckett is an established lawyer working at the largest law firm in Philadelphia. His employers are, at first, satisfied with his performance and promote him. At the time of this promotion Beckett has come in contact with the AIDS virus which has a high mortality rate. Beckett noticed the lesions that had formed on his skin, but chose to ignore them. One of his coworkers had noticed and suspected the possibility of Beckett having AIDS but said nothing. Beckett proceeds to take several days off to find a way to hide the lesions and work on files. All is well in Beckett’s work life until a mistake is made and a paper file goes missing with no digital copy, but is found just in time for court submission. His employers

Convicted for the murders of his wife and two kids, thirty-four years ago, Dr. MacDonald still endures the agony of being accused of killing his family. Even after twenty-four years of imprisonment and several unlawful court hearings, additional documentation continues to up hold Dr. MacDonald’s testimony.

The video played in the class is a criminal justice case involving two separate important groups, the police who investigate crime and the district attorneys who prosecute the defendant Mr. Garcia in the killing of Warren Slater. Fairhaven Health Insurance (FHI) is the company with whom Mr. Garcia registered an insurance plan for his daughter Courtney Garcia, who suffers from (CML) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, and for which he pays a premium. Slater, who was murdered, works for FHI was the plan’s coordinator. Mr. Garcia, the defendant, in my own view is guilty of committing homicide because of the following reasons: First, He did not have enough evidence or verifiable reasons to conclude that administering Gleevec (Drug) would be a better

On 03/02/17, at approximately 1900 hours, at the Durango Jail located at 3225 W. Gibson Lane, Phoenix AZ 85009, Inmate Brodsky, Raymond T344015 (V1) approached me at Durango 1 A-Pod entry door and stated he had been choked by an unknown inmate in the pod. I noticed as he walked out of the pod that Inmate Brodsky's (V1) neck had red marks on it. I then escorted him to Durango Medical Clinic.

The case was that Rudolph Holton appealed his conviction for first-degree murder and sentence of death. Facing the challenges of his convictions for first-degree murder and sexual battery assault to a woman. On June 23, 1986, a woman was practically found unclothed it was the body of Katrina Graddy, that was found in a burning vacant house. Leaving everyone in doubt of who could’ve done that to her. In the crime scene they found pieces of her clothing that someone had tied around her neck and around Katrina’s wrist. The scene was so traumatizing that they say that a glass bottle was partially inserted in her intimate parts. Soon law enforcement tested sperm remaining in the victim's body coming to find that the tests were all negative. From the many police men who were studying the case the victim's body, police men questioned Carl Scheck who had been found sleeping his truck parked directly across from the burning house. He told investigators that he had been parked there for about an hour from 10:00 or 11:00 p.m. the night before. He stated that he knew nothing, that he was just waiting for the hitchhiker. Scheck kept saying that he fell asleep during that time and eventually was awakened by the fire engines night. From the

Upon my arrival as I approached Cell 15 I noticed large amounts of blood on the floor inside the cell as well as the words "I'm sorry" smeared in blood on the back wall of the cell. Inmate Whitehead, Richard MCSO Booking Number T337608 was lying on his bed unresponsive. Moments later I entered cell 15 with Officer Shoemaker B3008 to help remove Inmate Whitehead from his cell and place him on a gurney by lifting him using the sheet from his mattress underneath him. Once he was successfully on the gurney I assisted in strapping

The issue of this case is whether or not my client killed the victim and the is answer is clearly no. Mr. Jack Merridew is innocent.

A Pathologist testified about Mr. Vaugeois’ health conditions with respect to pathology. He stated that Mr. Vaugeois’ health was already deteriorating, due to hypertension and cardiovascular disease. He testified that he believed that the pepper spray, which was used in attempt to stop Mr. Vaugeois’ act of self-harm, did not result in death, considering there was a 40-minute gap until his cardiac arrest. However, he stated that because Mr. Vaugeois was restrained by paramedics while he was defensive on the stretcher, his heart rate would’ve increased dramatically. He added that additional elements, like irritation and anger would’ve introduced high levels of psychological stress. The jury heard that the time of death would be the time the heart stopped beating.

A 33-year-old woman was sentenced 2 years behind bars for faking her suffering from cancer. Her name was Sarah Lucas and she lived in Hamilton. From early 2013 to July 2015, she managed to collect up to $219,000 by forging signatures to create legitimate looking documents, fraud of more than $5,000 and identity fraud. Sarah’s scheme of having to fake having cancer started back in 2013 when she first lied about having a disease. Sarah Lucas was sentenced to court and while the court was in session, Justice George Gage stated “the fact that you would use the tragic disease of cancer as your tool is quite frankly shameful” (Hamilton woman who faked cancer gets 2 years for fraud). Sarah Lucas did not deny her plead of being guilty when asked. Sarah

Good evening Your Honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, and opposing counsel. Tonight you heard the testimony and evidence in Roughed Grouse High School's attempt to hide, justify, and deny their negligent actions. In order to prove Roughed Grouse High School's negligence resulting in the death of Jordan Simon, I, along with my co-counsel, had to prove our case, not beyond a reasonable doubt, but simply by a preponderance of evidence. In other words, if you were to put the evidence favoring the case of the plaintiff and evidence favorable to the defendant on a scale, we the plaintiff would have to make the scales tip ever so slightly in our favor. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we have done just that. We have proved to you tonight

Facts: Shepard, defendant, was charged and convicted of the murdering his wife. Prosecution introduced statement Shepard’s wife made to the nurse as evidences during the trial. Shepard’s wife told her nurse stating that her husband had poisoned her. She also asked the nurse to find the whiskey bottle from defendant’s closet and perform the poison test which she had drunk from. The prosecution introduced the wife’s conversation based on the state of mind exception and dying declaration exception under the hearsay rule. Shepard appeared.

Procedural History: Davidson, the defendant, was convicted of reckless second-degree murder and child endangerment. The jury had been instructed for establishing the charge that the defendant had killed Christopher Wilson, the victim, “unintentionally but recklessly under circumstances showing extreme indifference to the value of human life. They were also instructed to consider involuntary manslaughter. The jury that the defendant had acted an extreme degree of recklessness The defendant appealed to her conviction to the second-degree murder charges because of a lack of sufficient evidence. The defendant argues that the evidence by the State only proves that she failed to only secure her dogs. She argues that it is not for second-degree murder because the State failed to establish a “depraved heart scienter.” and that they failed to prove that the dogs actions were foreseeable. She also argued that the State lacked sufficient evidence to prove

Good morning Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury. For the past several weeks you have heard testimony from the defense stating that their client is innocent of murdering Mr. Wallace, a 24 year old man that was shot and killed in the early morning of March 9, 1997, as he was leaving a music industry party. He was riding in the front passenger seat of a Chevrolet Suburban when another vehicle pulled up beside his and someone opened fire. According to autopsy reports he was shot four times. The medical expert stated the bullet that killed Mr. Wallace was the bullet that entered his right hip and ripped through several organs, including his liver, heart and lung. The other bullets struck Wallace in his left forearm, his back and his left thigh. At the time of his death, he had no drugs or alcohol in his system. I have proven that the defendant murdered Mr. Wallace for no apparent reason. It is up to you to decide hold the defendant

Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury may I present to you my client Mrs.Maloney. My client is not guilty of murder due to temporary insanity and I will prove this throughout my argument.