Cpp Report for Motorcycle in Canada

ACC/291 March 25,2012   Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio: Current Assets/Current Liabilities 2005 $14,555,092/ $6,974,752= 2.09:1 2004 $14,643,456/ $6,029,696=2.43:1 Acid Test Ratio: Cash+ Short-Term Investments + Receivables (Net)/ Current Liabilities 2005 $305,563 + $283,583 +$6,133,663/ $6,974,752= .96:1 2004 $357,216 + $133,504 + $5,775,104/ $6,029,696=1.04:1 Receivables Turnover: Net Credit Sales/ Average Net Receivables 2005 $50,823,685/ ($6,133,663 + 5,775,104/2) $50,823,685/ $5,954,384= 8.54 times 2004 $46,044,288/($5,775,104+6,569,344/2) $46,044,288/ $6,172,224=7,46 times Inventory Turnover: Cost of Goods Sold/ Average Inventory 2005 $42,037,624/ ($7,850,970+$7,854,112/2) $42,037,624/$7,852,541=5.35 times

The higher the ratio the better the company stands with ability to pay loans. The four quarters for quick ratios in year one are as follows; 1.48, -.14, .25, 1.29, and year 2-4 are as follows; 3.26, 3.88, 5.11, 5.69 (NetMBA, 2010.)

There are two chief participants in this case study, Paul Mackay and Jackie Patrick. Mackay, a sole proprietor of Lawsons (a general merchandising retail site in Riverdale, Ontario), has approached the Commercial Bank of Ontario in order to acquire an additional $194, 000 bank loan and a $26,000 line of Credit. Patrick, a first time loans officer, has been appointed to Mackay’s request. As such

• Present 5 years of statements – Ratio – Trend Analysis – See if ratios are improving

Mr. Paul Mackay, a sole proprietor, has approached the Commercial Bank of Ontario in order to obtain an additional $194,000 bank loan and a $26,000 line of credit. Paul owns and operates a general merchandising retailer in Riverdale, Ontario named Lawsons’. The bank loan is needed for Mr. Mackay to reduce his trade debt that has a sheer 13.5 per cent interest penalty. The line of credit is needed for sales seasonal downfalls so that Mr. Mackay could properly manage those tough months. Jackie Patrick, a first time loans officer, has been appointed to Mr. Mackay’s request. Although anxious to finish her first loan, Ms. Patrick knows that this particular case is a difficult one.

&/Ehrhardt M. (2010). Financial Management: Theory & Practice, 13th Edition. South Western Educational Publishing. Mason

1. Potz and Pans current ratio is 5 and WannaBees current ratio is 1.76. The company more likely to receive the loan is Potz and Pans because there higher current ratio number means they will have a higher chance of repaying their loan back to the bank when compared to WannaBees.

Overall regards to liquidity ratios, the higher the number the better; however, a too high also indicates that the firms were not using their resources to their full potential. Current ratio of 1.0 or greater shows that a company can pay its current liabilities with its current assets. JWN’s ratio increased from 2.06 in 2007 to 2.57 in 2010, and slightly decreased to 2.16 in 2011. JWN’s cash ratio increased significantly from 22% in 2007 to 80% in 2010. JWN has a cash ratio of 73% in 2011, which is useful to creditors when deciding how much debt they would be willing to extend to JWN. In addition, JWN also has moderate CFO ratio of 46%, indicating the companies’ ability to pay off their short term liabilities with their operating cash

A decreasing trend in the current ratio indicated by JB Hi-Fi from 2015 to 2017 that reveals a lesser safety of margin for short term creditor. As we can see from the table current ratio has declined by 0.3 times. This effect is a distinctive sign that the organization may experience in the situation of considerable difficulties when they pay their present liabilities for short run. By these outcomes, it is obvious that regardless of whether the organization exchanges all - of its present

The Quick Ratio also known as Acid Ratio is used by firms to determine liquidity position. It explains if the firm is able to pay all of their current debt liabilities. (Dyson, 2010) The graph above illustrates that over the period from 2007 to 2011 quick ratio was not more that 1, which means that their debts might not be covered all. The graph also indicates that a peak was in 2011.

The debt-to-capital ratio gives users an idea of a company's financial structure, or how it is financing its operations, along with some insight into its financial strength. The higher the debt-to-capital ratio, the more debt the company has compared to its equity. Star River has always depended much on debt for its financing and the trend shows this ratio may get higher in future. Star River, with high debt-to-capital ratios, compared to a general or industry average, may show weak financial strength because the cost of these debts may weigh on the company and

Lawsons 2010 and 2011 current ratio are above the industry average (1.8:1) however in 2012 the current ratio falls below the industry average at 1.55:1 and than again in 2013 to 1.02:1. This indicates that the company’s ability to pay its debts is

These ratios help company in determining its capability to pay short-term debts. Liquidity ratios inform about, how quickly a firm can obtain cash by liquidating its current assets in order to pay its liabilities. General liquidity ratios are: current ratio and quick ratio. Current ration can be obtain by dividing company’s current assets by its’ current liabilities. Generally a current ratio of two is considered as good (Cleverley et al., 2011). Quick ratio also known as acid test determines company’s liabilities that need to be fulfilled on urgent basis. Quick ratio can be obtained by dividing quick assets by current liabilities. Quick ratio is considered as stricter because it excludes inventories from current assets. Generally a quick ratio of 1:1 is considered as good for the company. Higher quick

This group of ratios emphasis can easily indicate the Amcor’s capability to meet short term debt obligations. Current ratio and Quick ratio will be calculated in this part. These two ratios are quite similar, short term creditors, such as bankers and suppliers are interested in this class of ratios, because they can measure the short term debt-paying ability of company.

In year 2007 quick ratio reached dangerous point – 1,02, company’s ability to pay its short-term obligations was badly influenced by the increase in short-term liabilities In 2008 meaning of the ratio grew up, because of the factors listed above. In year 2009 both ratios fell, since company took more liabilities than in 2008: its short-term borrowings, current tax and short-term provisions increased Average showings on AstraZeneca Quick ratio during the period was 1,13, while GSK – 1,22 which again proves that GSK was more liquid during the analysed period.