Craig Martin stated, “The world is not just there for us to find and discover – rather, we make the world what it is through our use of language.” (21). This further expands on the notion that human beings are the makers of social constructs and social roles; we make these categories that we place ourselves and others in to give each other a sense of identity. Human beings like to be in control of their world and everything in it. Anything that tries to disrupt that or is outside of their control brings a sense of chaos.
In the words of Craig Martin, a meritocracy is defined as “a society in which people get what they earn, deserve or merit” (72). Religions area generally known to be fair and peaceful for all to be welcome and equal, which
…show more content…
Jainism was founded two thousand and five years ago so it can be classified as an ancient Indian religion. Jainism centers on the belief that there is a soul but no god; Jainism is historically characterized by fundamental principle called ahimsa, which means non-violence, non-injury or absence of desire to harm any life forms, they are the exemplars in India on how to live a non-violent life. It is generalized that Jains are the most non-violent people in the world; they do not eat meat or roots that do not grow into the ground, in fact Jain monks do not wear clothing because clothing is made from fibres, which also entails killing plants. They walk around with masks covering their noses so as not to accidentally inhale any insects. Many Jains are prosperous in India because they are merchants and they work in fields that do not require anything that they would consider violent. Starving or fasting until ones death so as not to bring about any more violence as you transition into the next phase of your existence characterizes the end of a Jain monks or nuns life The goal of a Jains life is to become a tirthankara, which is an enlightened …show more content…
Aidan Rankin a researcher wrote a book titled Jainism and ethical finance drawing global awareness to the culture of Jainism and it’s ability to sustain those that practice it for years. The article stated, “Jains make one of the largest per capita communities of accountants, financiers and entrepreneurs in the world – yet they operate quietly and simply, that is why they remain unnoticed. Finance has been in their DNA for centuries.” This further expatiates on when the short video classified Jains as prosperous merchants in India. This raises some ethical questions on how Jains have been able to be prosperous without any support of violence in their careers. Jainism seems to be a religion that can only be realistic in India because it is recognized as a major religion there and they have lived there for so long they have been able to build a community that supports and encourages their practices culturally and environmentally. A question that may be raised is what is the definition of prosperity, is it defined my money, which is made from paper that comes from trees? Also the fact that a book also made from several trees was written to support and maybe convert those that read it into the practice is a bit ironic. The last ethical issue that what could the Jain merchants possibly be selling that is a result of non violence of any animal or plants that can bring about so much prosperity that it is news worthy. Jainism seems to a very
Wouldn’t it be nice to have it all? Wouldn’t it be nice to live in a society where everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed in life? No one looks at race or anything of that nature just solely on merit and no matter where you come from or what you go through you have the same opportunity as the next person. Merit is the quality of being particularly good or worth especially so as to deserve praise or reward.
1. Ahimsa- nonviolence belief means extremely gentle or harmless. This is the core belief in Jainism. It includes avoiding occupations that may harm other living animals including insects, using items made from animals such as leather and feathers.
In the essay The Merits of Meritocracy David Brooks mentions, that meritocracy is the social system that gives opportunities and advantages to people on the basis of their abilities rather then reasons such as wealth or seniority. He believes that people more or less deserve what they get, those people who do not work hard or build up their skills should not expect rewards. He also argued that in school and in the workplace Americans need to focus on achievement, dedication, continuous improvement, and hard work. People have to succeed through there performance: those who work hard should win praise those who don’t work hard will suffer the consequences. A persons country of origin should be no excuse at all.
Jainism and Buddhism acknowledge extremely similar aspects in their respective religions. They both have a grounded belief of karma, samsara, and one of liberation. Although these basic principle are the same, they have differences within them. In this essay, it will discuss the similarities and differences between the basic beliefs and traditions regarding karma, samsara, recognition of the self, and final liberation in regards to Jain and Buddhist religions.
The United State is definitely not a society where there is meritocracy because of the class system within our country. Class plays a major role in which the rich have access to higher education, jobs and opportunities than compared to the lower classes. A great example of this would be an upper class in the United State, better known as the one percent. The upper class is a numerous small group with wealthy member, which is said to make up about 1 percent of the population. They are the upper class of United State, who owns a large amount of the money in the country. The class system is something that is very well known as stated by William Domhoff “People are very aware of basic economic and educational differences and they can size up social standing fairly well from such outward signs as speech patterns, mannerisms, and style of dress, but the
In a meritocracy, a person is elected into their position based on their ability and what they are able to do to positively impact the society. With this government in place, it will prevent just anyone from having too much power. By putting people in positions with their strongest abilities accentuated, it will better the country as a whole. A government like this also has a lower risk of corruption. When you ensure that only the people with the right credentials will be in office it prevents a multitude of horrible things from happening to the country. Therefore, citizens will not have to worry if their leaders are only there because of their money and how well they are able to impress people with it. When a country puts everything they have into restraining corruption, it is well on its way to being the best it can be.
Both Jainism and Sikhism have arisen as alternatives to Hinduism within India. As Molloy highlights, they both share a belief in karma with Hinduism, but both reject the polytheistic and ritualistic elements of Hinduism. Despite these similarities, Jainism and Sikhism are different in their emphasis. The founder of Jainism was named Mahavira. He was the twenty fourth, in a succession of saints, called tirthankaras. Mahavira was born into an aristocratic family, and much of his life is shrouded in legend, but all version of his life story agree, that at the age of 30 he embraced the wandering life of an aesthetic holy man. His is said to have endured much pain, and sacrifice at his own hands, and at the hands of others. During this
An article published by Arthur C. Brooks, a writer for The Washington Post, stated that “We are not a perfect opportunity society in the United States. But if we want to approach that ideal, we must define fairness as meritocracy, embrace a system that rewards merit, and work tirelessly for true equal opportunity” (4). Brook’s statement expresses the views of our society today, as it is widely accepted that a society with meritocracy is favorable over a society with social determinism in America. However, there is often altercation when discussing whether or not meritocracy is present in our modern day society. The Civil Rights movement, feminist movements, and immigration movements have all brought our society towards meritocracy.
Jainism is another religion of India, it has very close relations with other main religions of India like Hinduism and Buddhism. It
In ancient India people believed in jainism is an ancient religion from India that teaches the way to liberation and bliss is to live a life of harmlessness. Some believed in sikhism which
The myth of meritocracy has been proven true in multiply sources. Studies have hypothesized this before when relating to upward mobility. Upward mobility in the last forty years has been more and more unlikely for years and years now. Factors like race, socioeconomic status, household makeup, and economic conditions of this country play a big role. I will go more indepth about this study by showing more facts in the following paragraphs.
The constantly growing and changing world is trying its best to sway and alter the
Jains have five incredibly important aspects that they follow. The first is ahimsa, non-harm, not only to themselves but to everyone and their environment. Next, Jains believe in telling the truth; they don't believe in over exaggerating or lying because it can cause pain to someone (which brakes ahimsa).
Both Jainism and Buddhism originated in India. Yet, unlike Hinduism, neither is based on the Vedas, and both were alternatives to the ritual-oriented Brahmanism of India. The extreme antiquity of Jainism is well documented from ancient Hindu and Buddhist scriptures, but the teachings
Jainism was distinguished for their extreme practices, even to the severity of death by self starvation. They focus on asceticism or the mortification of the flesh and individuals, striving toward moral perfection by means of nonviolence. They especially avoid harming any living creature since every manifestation of nature has