Creative and Critical Thinking II
1. Have you ever changed a strongly held attitude? What caused the change for you?
I have only experienced a shift in my personal beliefs once: at one point in time I believed I was relegated to working in a factory, now I do not have the same belief. I believe that the shift in my attitude was due to an internal growth; I became more self-aware after my father passed away. I looked at my father, and all he had done, and began to believe that I was capable of the same amazing personal success.
2. Do you believe that you are free of prejudice? After reading this chapter, which of the many factors that cause prejudice do you think is most important?
No one in this world is truly free of prejudice;
…show more content…
In other words, if the students pretending to be guard, or inmate could adjust to the role so quickly, it is easy to see how the power would go to the guards head at Abu Ghraib. The similarity is that the guards were a group, and the prisoners were a group. The guards had the power. The inmates were abused for the slightest misstep, and that seemed normal to the guards.
5. Have you ever done something in a group that you would not have done if you were alone? What happened? How did you feel? What have you learned from this chapter that might help you avoid this behavior in the future?
I attempted to teach my friend how to drive when I was 16. There were four of my friends in the car when the lesson began. The car was totaled. My friends were hurt, I was hurt. I felt horrible as a juvenile for being responsible for that accident. I have learned that you should never listen to what a group of people is saying to you; you should think for yourself. Groupthink is a terrible thing.
6. Can you think of situations when the egoistic model of altruism seems most likely correct? What about the empathy-altruism hypothesis?
According to the text: the egoistic model of altruism is a behavior that a person displays because he would like to have the same favor done for him, or would like to alleviate guilt. The egoistic model of altruism is something that a person might use when donating money at his company for a cause, or helping with a charitable event. Not
Psychological egoism is the interpretation that humans are always inspired by self-interest, even in what seem to be acts of altruism. It claims that, when people choose to help others, they do so ultimately because of the personal benefits that they themselves expect to obtain, directly or indirectly, from doing so. Psychological egoism, which was widely recognized by psychologists and philosophers states that all human actions are motivated by selfish needs to benefit themselves. According to psychological egoists true altruism does not exist because the consequence of such an act leads to an increase in personal happiness. However, Joel Feinberg does not agree with that theory and in his essay he disagreed with the thesis that altruism
Egoism and Altruism . Psychological egoism claims that whatever we do, we do out of self-interest. Give an example of an act you think is not done out of self-interest, and explain how the psychological egoist might try to interpret that act as selfish.
I have done things in a group that I would most certainly not do alone. The result were never good, even when I was never reprimanded I was left with a feeling of quilt and remorse. Two thing I think can help me the most in the future is to seek an outside opinion that doesn’t have the same group mentality and also they have an impartial leader whom can see the fact and not
1: People throughout the world are able to respond differently because everyone has a unique perspective at what is visually seen. The art one person can notice may not be art to another. Sometimes are brain plays a grand role when one has a certain perception towards an image. Also based on human characteristics, some people are judgmental of certain pictures because of life events such as religion, culture, or even family.
Altruism is a concept in which the individual sacrifices regard for themselves in the interest of another. The ethics of altruism state that a person should act in a matter where their self-sacrifice yields the greater well being on the whole. To put that statement in the form of a fundamental principle of rightness, an action is right if and only if (and because) the action brings a net-gain of well being to anyone except the individual performing the action. The altruistic mentality of an individual according to this moral theory means that any action that they undertake should be in the interest of others rather than themselves. The ethics of this concept also state that relationships of greater value to the individual carrying out an action should come second in priority to those they have with strangers since the close relationship has a much more meaningful connection to a person’s life. In these situations, the only morally correct way of acting is in the way that defeats the well being of the agent of an action for the sake of others.
Egoism can be divided into two categories: psychological egoism and ethical egoism. Thomas Hobbes promoted psychological egoism, which is the idea that all actions can be interpreted as selfishly motivated (Banks, 2013). Hobbes provided the example that pity can be interpreted as egotistical in the sense that people pity others because they are reminded that the same thing may happen to them (Banks, 2013). Psychological egoism theorizes the ways in which people actually behave, but on the other hand, ethical egoism theorizes the ways people ought to behave (Banks, 2013). Ethical egoism suggests that people have no obligation other than to do what is best for them (Banks, 2013). Ethical egoism is different from Deontology because, first, egoism allows people to be treated as a means to an end if the act promotes self-interest and, second, egoism gives wants and desires priority over helping
Altruism is when the actions of a person promote the best consequences for others, yet do not benefit the person who performed the act. Abruzzi and McGandy (2006) explain that Auguste Comte developed the term to support his ethical stance that humans are morally obliged to serve the interests of others,
Altruism refers to the concern for the welfare and well being of others without personal gains or
The growing division between our classmates would eventually lead to one of my most regrettable experiences. Groupthink is a group pressure, which allows one to conform to society despite individual misgivings, which causes dysfunctions to rise (Brym and Lie 2018). Groupthink may be displayed as being “a team player”; however, such a conformity causes misgivings, which lead to disasters, which can be caused by bystander apathy (Brym and Lie 2018). My experience of groupthink was an unconscious one, where the boys and girls in our class had been socially separated by gender. My experiences of not standing up for the right cause and blindly following a group that displayed dominance over the girls in my 2nd grade class emphasizes the power of
Rachels (2003) described ethical egoism to having three arguments which makes it a valid ethical theory to abide by. One of the arguments explained how it is in one’s self-interest to not have help from others (Rachels, 2003). It is considered degrading to have someone offer his or her “charity” (Rachels, 2003, p.194) in attempts to make one’s life better. A person does not want to be regarded as incapable and in need of someone’s help. If everyone was to adapt an ethical egoist point of view, no one would be seen as inferior and everyone would be given an equal chance to succeed (Rachels, 2003). If strong affirmative action programs were employed to the NESA program everyone would undermine
During my junior year, I was required to do lab for my AP Physics C class. We were required to choose a group of three people for which to work with for the entire year, and of course, like most other people, I decided to choose two of friends. However, during the first lab we did together, I would realize my mistake. My group members were lazy and didn’t have the most motivation to work. Due to this, I found myself almost thrusted into the leadership position within the group because I wanted to somehow make the group function properly. I had to micromanage both of my partners at all times to make sure that they never got sidetracked and made them do the things that they actually wanted to do. One of my friends didn't know much of physics,
An act should not be written off as selfish or self-motivated simply because it includes some inevitable element of self-interest [or reward]. The act can still be counted as altruistic if the ‘selfish’ element is accidental; or, if not accidental, then secondary; or, if neither accidental nor secondary, then undetermining… [This is the] very heart of ancient virtue, which can be defined as the perfection of our nature through the triumph of reason over passion. The truly altruistic act
First, it is important to understand what altruism is. Altruism is any act carried out by an individual in order to benefit another individual. [1, 2] At first glance,
Knowledge is generated through critical and creative thinking. Creative thinking is something new or original that is created with value. Critical thinking is a type of thinking that questions assumptions and validates or invalidates a current belief or something that is said to be previously true. Knowledge is created through the culmination of generally accepted assumptions and creativity. How do you separate general assumptions and creativity? These two types of thinking can be easily separated in regards to concrete or realistic ideas compared to abstract or original ideas however to generate new, acceptable knowledge critical and creative thinking must interact together. The questioning of established beliefs with the creation of
Altruism derives from the French word autrui, meaning "other people”. The simple definition: feelings and behavior that show a desire to help other people. The full definition: unselfish regard for or devotion to the welfare of others. (Merriam Webster Dictionary). People are willing to help others in times of need when a disaster happens regardless to their circumstances. This shows the heart of individuals toward others survival and recovery.