Creativism a Constant Company of Humans Throughout History

Statistic shows that only 25% worldwide thinks that they are living up to be creative in someway. However, 75% seems to disagree with this. It all depends on where you are because you could be thinking differently from another place. In the United States however, 52% thinks they are living up to be creative in someway or might be using it. In that case, Japan has the most rate of a creative country overall. Rupal Parekh, 6 in 10 people thinks creativity is much too valuable. Just imagine how successful you are in the future or what kind of job you will be employed

In the context of creativity’s stated definition, we will proceed to group our arguments into three themes of factors: cognitive ability, expertise training, and environmental conditions. The human brain is highly adaptable and can continue to develop new cognitive abilities, even past adulthood (Norman, 2015). Proper cognitive expertise and training can help workers produce and operate in ingenious ways (Ginamarie, Lertiz & Mumford, 2004). Finally, the working environment can both motivate or stifle creative output. Managers can influence all three components: expertise, thinking skills, and motivation (Amabile, 1998).

What creativity actually is when you use your imagination, allowing things in the mind to occur that wouldn’t actually occur and also things to better the world. “Being creative is not only about thinking: it is about feeling” (160). You can not just think but you have to have feelings to make sure that you doing things right and feeling like you made something productive in the time. Being creative requires a long process, “magination which is the process of bringing to mind things that are not present to our senses; creativity, which is the process of developing original ideas that

S. I. Hayakawa wrote and published an article named "What lt Means to Be Creative". This article challenged how a creative person could be defined and identified. In Hayakawa’s essay he presents several points of view an individual could be characterized as being creative. His writing forces you to contemplate on how a person’s aptitudes are categorized. Hayakawa tests your ability to be opened minded and makes you visualize how a person could be described as a creative individual but may discredited themselves due to society’s standard of this word. After reading his writing, I believe I can summarize his analogy.

Creativity, the creative expressions in various forms of art and in new ideas, as well as the creative production of scientific and technological change, is what has shaped and influenced the world’s history

Paulus & Nijstad (2003) defined creativity as “the development of original ideas that are useful or influential”(p.3). That is to say,

Last exemplar showing creativity was the world wide web. The inventor Tim Berners-Lee, when inventing the WWW, changed the way we communicate, the way we socialise, the way we do research, the way we learn and many other things. This shows creativity, as this one computer network has changed the way of life, and potentially have made things easier. The obvious advantage of the WWW is that every website you can think of is found though this computer system, thus can’t really compare to any website, as if there was no WWW, then these websites would not be existent. Though there could be some negatives such as wrong information, and other factors, the WWW shows creativity because, creativity is about making people see things in different ways,

A closer look at creativity indicates that it is present in painting. For example, going back to what I said in the previous paragraph on how the painting is unique because it is easily recognizable; this also makes it creative. Creative means it is unique; since it is unique then it must mean that the painting is creative. Another example is it contains original patterns, this makes it creative because they are unique. One final example

being creative is a nice trait to have. the meaning of creative is “ the ability to make something unique and special.” most artists (like myself), authors, songwriters, cosplayers, exc. have this trait and we use it to our advantage. whether it be for fame, for money, or for fun, you need to be creative to create works of art. this also helps with school projects and (at least for me) is a good way to kill time.

It does not have to have benefits. Creativity does not need to be a new idea, method or

Creativeness is something that I admire about things. If it is creative then it is unique and is something that other people have not seen. To me, creative means different and beautiful in its own way. This means that the work should have some sort of meaning that people can see or understand. This also means that the work should be unique. The way I express my creativeness is through graffiti. I love to make graffiti drawings because they can demonstrate very powerful points or situations that are ignored by the world. I also love to see the different types of graffiti drawings there are because they are creative. I think that graffiti is creative because it has meaning and it is beautiful. For example, there are some graffiti paintings in

Within the fields of both cognitive and educational studies an abundance of research has been undertaken in an attempt to better conceptualise and define the term creativity. Within many contemporary Educational fields of research the need to provide a clear definition of the term has provided researchers with the challenge of conceptualising creativity so that a student’s display of creativity could be assessed. Sternberg (1986) suggests that ‘being creative highlights a subject’s ability to push traditional modes of displaying knowledge’ (pp. 16, 24). Similarly, Franken (2005) reconfigured this definition, stating that ‘creativity is a higher form of knowledge’ (pp. 124). Within both definitions the concept of creativity is centred within the idea that creativity is a part of ordinary human cognition. Further, Coughlin (2006) suggests that ‘Creativity is generating new ideas and concepts… where connections are made between ideas where there was no clear connection existing’ (pp. 35). Similar to the definitions of Sternberg (1986) and Franken (2005), Coughlin situates creativity within the processes of human thought—however Coughlin furthers this idea by stating that ‘creativity cannot be displayed … it is a process not a product’ (pp. 37). Camp (2011) however, argues that the definition proposed by Franken places too much emphasis on Creativity being an explicit form of knowledge (17), Camp further suggests that to define creativity ‘a subject must first look at the

What can be identified as being creative? In simple words being creative means to have the ability to think outside the box and coming up with innovative ideas or solutions. The ability to be creative can be accomplish by any human, although only a few can naturally cultivate this skill. Creativity can be acquired by any human because there are no specific genetic traits needed in order to be creative, some of the greatest minds in history such as Albert Einstein were thought to be of low intelligence, anything is possible with the proper training.

Creativity can be a difficult trait to quantify and agree on, due to varying opinions on what makes a creative person. Psychologists, scientists, and educators have spent their careers studying, developing tests, and defining creativity in an effort to give us quality information on creative giftedness. There has been a growing and evolving definition of creativity, where intelligent (convergent) and creative (divergent) thinking are considered to work together, since J.P. Guilford began his work (Treffinger, 2004, p. xxiii). Due to the continued misunderstandings of the general population, the needs of creative students are still unmet in the typical education system. This is easiest proven by the simple fact that we are still having the

According to the ethnographic approach defined by Papen and Tusting (2006, p.312-359), creativity refers the production of something ‘new’ and ‘original’. In written language, creativeness should not be perceived as a decontextualised, individual activity or as being entirely shaped by context. It should be seen as being dependent on and emergent from the creative literacy practices through which texts are constructed because they are shaped by people, who in pursuit of their own