Is Russia regressing as a society due to the remnants of the Soviet Union emerging through, in doing this are they creating a hybridity of two societies, using past ideals while under another establishment - Are their ethics on homosexuality an example of this?
This essay shall be addressing the current regime of Russia, by looking into the ostensive Russian ethics on homosexuality and their leader, Vladimir Putin while using a cultural materialist lens. I shall be expanding further from a previous written Critical Analysis to create a more consequential argument. This subject matter will be explained and justified further with the live performance of ‘Crematorium’, a play adapted and originally called A Little Hero, written by Valeriy Pecheykin.
…show more content…
It has already happened inside me, every fiber of my being is dead.
Turn on the machine! I’m begging you! I can’t, I can’t take this anymore!.. I’m not the only
One you can torture, am I? What is it to you, really? Please… Turn on the machine, turn it on. Goes-dark’ (Pecheykin:22:2014)
The aforesaid is the scene in which the live performance of the play displays the man being questioned, entering a crematorium and seemingly being burned by it. This scene exhibits a very powerful message to the audience, using small and rare humorous shards of dialogue throughout the play to then bring the audience into this black hole of terrifying desperation, with such a brutal scene.
‘VOICE: Do we understand correctly, Mr. Morozov, that after trying all available cures for homosexuality, you acknowledge your deficiency and have decided to pursue voluntary treatment with the help of the machine known as “device 404”?3’
…show more content…
The hegemony and the de facto leader, Putin himself, their roles and official titles: President, Prime Minister and Democracy are facades. Breaking traditions that don’t hold place within the structure of communism, a facet of Marxism. Ultimately, this has induced the institution to further the already dominant. Because of this, a residual effect has ensued and the dominant which had initially become less homophobic on the surface with old laws being scrapped, has actually regressed back to more antiquated views. At present, manipulating the already manipulated people of these preposterous and offensive views on homosexuality, Putin is not only creating an emergent society but simply furthering from what was already the dominant. Cultural Materialism as a lens to analysis said topic is interesting as it stems from the very founders of the social and governmental system that even still guides and effects Russia today. Being an aspect of each other, Marxism and Communism can’t exist without each other which creates intellectual isochronism as you’re not able to deviate much, as by virtue both theoretical perspectives and topic are at the core being driven by indistinguishable areas of social and political
Throughout its long history, Russia has been trapped in a continuous cycle of authoritarian regimes; only interrupted briefly with periods of tumultuous democratic transitions that were plagued by poor bureaucracy and weak institutions. Therefore, time and time again, Russia has turned towards authoritarianism. In the late 1900’s to early 2000’s, Russia again saw the fall of democracy coincide with the rise of a competitive authoritarian regime. This rise of competitive authoritarianism in Russia in the late 1900’s to early 2000’s was largely the result of the resource curse which granted Putin’s Administration false economic performance legitimacy. This in turn reinvigorated past strongman ideals, while at the same time solidified negative
The democratization, economic liberalization, and eventual collapse of the Soviet Union is commonly attributed to Mikhail Gorbachev's Perestroika and Glasnost reforms during the period of 1985-1991. This purpose of these reforms is still a trenchant question as the countries of the old Soviet Union, particular Russia, are being pressured to further liberalize their economies.
Russia, as a country, has had a long and proud history. However, for a small time starting in 1917, things started to take a turn for the worse. There was widespread famine, disease, and killing by the instituted government. There was also no Russia. Instead, there was the glorious United Soviet Socialist Republics, or the USSR. This new country did not come around peacefully, but instead under the 1917 Russian Revolution and the revolting communist Bolsheviks. The Russian people were not in a better condition after the Russian revolution due to Stalin’s leadership of his country; the reason being the GULAGs that Stalin was sending his people to, the communes that the peasants were sent to, and the disastrous effects of his five year plans.
Former Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev presided over the disintegration of a country based on an uncompromising ideological dogma, the unlikely inheritor of Marxist/Leninist communist philosophy. The Soviet Union’s unwieldy economic superstructure left it vulnerable to Ronald Reagan’s aggressive economic/military policy, an approach based on the belief that a military build-up would force the Soviets to spend to keep pace, an effective strategy because it pushed the Soviet economy over the edge into ruin. The subsequent implosion ended communist domination in Eastern Europe and opened the way for democratic elements that radically altered the political landscape in Moscow. When the Soviet Union officially came to an end in 1993, it briefly recalled the end of tsarist rule in 1917, with the potential for the kind of chaos and violence that turned the Russian Revolution into a bloodbath. President Boris Yeltsin used the military to disband parliament but his call for new elections moved the country toward a more open, democratic form of government. Lacking any real background in representative government, Russia ultimately proved incapable of fulfilling the promise of democratic government and descended into a form of anarchy riddled by increasingly strong criminal elements. In recent years, the rise of Boris Putin, a new strongman in Moscow, helped restore a sense of order and allowed the resurgence of communist elements. The government that now holds power, and which
The economic downfall was also due to many sanctions placed on Russia post the annexation of Crimea. New opportunities will arise for Russia as they move from a natural resource country to a greener country, Russia has a plan to stimulate growth with green energy which will create jobs. They also have a $10 billon fund for research which they are hoping will stimulate future economic growth.
For many, governments offer guidance and reliance; citizens enjoy security, order, and direction from their political leaders. Yet some forms of government — specifically Communism — cause instability, confusion, and distraction in the lives of their citizens. In Maria Reva’s short story “Novostroika,” she depicts the animosity of a young Ukrainian man, Daniil Blinov, who battles the oppressions of Communist life. In his position, Danill struggles to keep his family satiated under the dominion of the U.S.S.R. This leads to various dilemmas throughout the piece. Within this story, Reva incorporates a space heater, a symbol of hope, and a coffin, a symbol of oppression, to convey how Communism crushes the hope of its citizens.
International responses to the injustices LGBTQ+ people face in Russia is monumental. The international community has tried on multiple occasion to influence reform on the hate crimes and discrimination that Is rampant throughout the world’s largest country. One of the
It has been twenty-five years since the fall of the Soviet Union; a communist nation that was once the mighty opponent of the United States, but over the course of time it ceased to exists. Without a doubt, the Soviet Union has been the subject of many historical works that primarily focused on political issues and government officials, but what about the average people, particularly women? Above any political ideology, Russia remained a patriarchal society before and after the Soviet Union.
The history of Russia and the Soviet Union is rich with culture and tradition. This tradition dates back well before homosexuals were common throughout society. When members of the gay community finally felt comfortable to begin coming out to the public, the Soviet Union decided to suppress their actions by outlawing homosexuality. Though harsh, these laws were not much of a shock to
Between 1900-1960 CE, Russia/Soviet Union had undergone major developments in which their political ideologies progressed from an absolute monarchy to communism. Another major development in Russia was the change in the status of religion as the power of religion progressively decreased as communism arose. Although Russia’s political ideologies and the status of religion has changed, the forms of governance in Russia generally remained the same. Russia at the time were faced with millions of casualties from both World War I and World War II, this caused their government to be in turmoil which then lead to the major changes in the Soviet Union.
The period is the early 19th century; those involved and discussed in this essay are for the most part Russian gentry. Increasingly relaxed social mores in the “developed” world, including the greater freedom to choose to whom one gets married to as well as increased women’s sexual rights, were much more uncommon during the time that War and Peace takes place. Tolstoy, an outspoken critic of arranged marriages, uses the characters in his novel as a way of exploring the various types of love, and in general the interactions between men and women of the time. This essay will attempt to focus on these relationships in an effort to get a better idea of Tolstoy’s views on the proper roles that men and women should play as friends, lovers, or
The Cold War was a tumultuous period for the Soviet Union, a time of mutually assured destruction. The Soviet Union achieved a high rate of economic growth from the end of World War II until 1975. During this period a transformation occurred from a “semifeudal, underdeveloped nation to a developed, industrial society […], with high life expectancies and literacy rates comparable to Western industrialized nations” (van der Veen, 122). However, during the 1980’s a number of domestic issues relating to the serious decline in the economic and social infrastructure, and the increasing gap in technology between the West and East came to the forefront of political discussions (Valerie Bunce, 223). In 1985 Mikhail Gorbachev took over as leader and
With the arrival of the second half of the 20th century, came the death of Stalin and a new age for not only Russia but the entirety of the Eastern Block as well. Russia, as always, stood in the face of adversity and, instead of crumbling, began to develop and progress in leaps and bounds. In the span of a mere 50 or so years Russia went from one political, social, and economic standing, (Stalinism) to its exact obverse. Despite the obvious changes a switch like this requires there are still some fundamental and intrinsically Russian sentiments and characteristics that were maintained throughout the change.
Homophobia is transporting Russia back in time to the late 1800s and early 1900s—the epoch of the racial issues in America. With several gay rights being legalized, it seemed that Russia had begun to accept the LGBT community into their society. But the violent and repressive actions towards gay people and their supporters have proved that Russia is not becoming any more tolerant of gays. It is unsure if Russians even view gays as humans. The present status of the Russian homophobia problem is starting to spiral out of control. Given Russia’s oscillating history with the LGBT community, it’s nearly impossible to predict whether or not Russia will accept or kill the gay people. Based on the current situation, it seems like the former will
Reforms and ethnic problems helped the Soviet Union collapse in 1991. What was the next move to help Russia be a major power in the world? Boris Yeltsin led Russia through most of the decade promoting something known as democracy and better living conditions than the Soviet Union. There were some failures along with success, however once Yeltsin was too old for the job he found a successor. Hence, Yeltsin passed the presidency on to Putin; the promotion of democracy was severely limited by an authoritarian leader wanting more power.