Crime Punishment In The 1600s Essay

Decent Essays
Crime Punishments in 1600’s, 1700’s, and 1800’s
People have been committing crimes for many centuries, however over time crime punishment changed in different ways. Some of the punishment methods used in one century is found not affective in another century. In England, during the 1600’s crime punishment where hasher and people who were considered criminals did not get many opportunities to be put on trial most time before being sent to face the death penalty. There are many factor that could have contributed to how crime punishment have revolved from the 1600’s all the way to the 1800’s. What were the causes that made the punishments from the 1600’s very different from the ones in the 1700’s and 1800’s? Is it just the different method
…show more content…
These two cases are one of many cases in the 16th century Old Bailey records, where a small crime is highly punishable same as a big crime such as murder.
Crime punishment in the 17th century in London was not any better than the methods such as the death penalty used in the 16th century. Matter of fact, one could say that the punishments in the 17th century was exactly as it was in the 16th century London. During this time period, people were still being punished for committing small crimes like stealing things. “There was still support for the execution of the most serious offenders, however, and in certain contexts, such as the 1720s and 1780s, which both experienced crime waves and political instability, the proportion of convicts executed increased.” (London Lives 1690 to 1800 crimes, poverty and social policy in the metropolis). Men and women were punished almost in the same way, however, if a pregnant woman is found guilty of any crime, she was given time to deliver the baby before she faced her punishment for her crimes. In the 17th, most the famous crime punishment method was hanging, criminals who were convicted were hanged instead of given other types of punishment.
Get Access