Crime Rates in the South

Baltimore, the largest city in Maryland, is located in the northern portion of the state on the Patapsco River estuary, a division of Chesapeake Bay. The city is self-governing and does not fall within any county. (Baltimore, Md., 2015) The vast majority of this city is poverty stricken, which makes it vulnerable to high crime rates. In the first six months of 2013 Baltimore had reported 117 homicides, with a population of 622, 104, (CITY DATA, 2015) this gives the city a rate of 18.8 per 100,000. It was one of few cities that year to actually see an increase in homicides; it was stated by Their City Police Commissioner that more than half of their homicides were related to drugs. Even though, the amount of violent crimes dwindled in 2013,

The articles written by Anderson, Baron, Cohn, Defronzo, and Falk, all present evidence depicting a correlation between weather and aggressive criminal activity. Each article poses various studies and research to support this correlation; these studies have been conducted on the field, using historical data, and in an experimental setting. The number of studies done on the temperature-aggression hypothesis and their respective results provide indication that there is something linking uncomfortable heat to greater instances of aggressive behavior. The authors seem to agree that while there is a correlation that weather is not the sole factor in the equation creating these fluctuations in crime levels. Through many of the studies, the month

Demographics provide the specifics necessary to obtain knowledge pertaining to a city’s inhabitants. Attaining this type of detailed information is vital to the creation of a flourishing municipality. Demographic data can offer crucial material in relation to the particulars, such as the districts residents reside, the districts most preferred, the areas more highly safeguarded, high crime areas, the elementary schools most preferred and what type of developments residents want to see within the area. Verification is made by evaluating the demographic attributes of the populace, areas of

Crime in New Orleans has dropped significantly since Hurricane Katrina. The crime homicides went down by 1.15 percent. It may not sound like a big number, but it is less than the number before Hurricane Katrina. People started stealing from each other because they were poor and could not afford anything. Then the person would murder the guy who stole from him, or you have the people who just shoot teach other just because. These things still happen today but not as much as before the hurricane. I think the hurricane put everything in perspective to where anything could happen to anyone at any time.

When we get into how society and people look at crime, it happens in every city, every neighborhood, people are victims every day, businesses, and even property. Crime dates back since colonization and the rates have varied over time, believe it or not, crime has decreased over the years. As a matter of fact, the United States has been on a decline. The crime rate for the year 2000 was a total of 11,608,072 a declining year in 2015 with a total of 9,225,197. (U.S. Department of Justice)

So far, both theories are able to explain the crime inequality observed insides neighbourhoods; however, when it comes to explaining the difference in crime rates between neighbourhoods with similarly low levels of poverty, social disorganization theory is not able to fully explain why such difference may occur, as it places a greater focus on the internal dynamics of the neighbourhoods than on the external contingencies (Peterson & Krivo, 2010, p. 92). Based on Table 4.5 of Divergent Social Worlds: Neighborhood Crime and the Racial-Spatial DivideI, minority low-poverty areas have roughly two and a half times more violence than their white counterparts (Peterson & Krivo, 2010, p. 88). Social disorganization theory insists that residential instability (percent of those who owns and percent of those who rent) , population heterogeneity (internal differences, including ethno-racial differences), poverty (percent of those who live in poverty), income, deteriorating neighbourhood, and population loss (percent of those who leave due to deterioration) are mechanisms that leads to the absence of informal social control and increases social disorganization, causing the loss of control over youths who then hang out at spontaneous playgrounds and form gangs with delinquent traditions that get passed down through cultural transmission. If such was the case, then one would expect neighbourhoods with similar and comparable local conditions to have similar average rates of crimes. However,

To test the null hypothesis, if the P-Value of the test is less than 0.05 I will reject the null hypothesis.

In addition to biological contributors, it remains likely for psychological factors to influence the likelihood of committing honor-based violence. For instance, those who commit honor crimes tend to show a specific type of

Crime rates have moved in parallel in Western social orders subsequent to the late Middle Ages. Murder rates declined from 20 to 100 for every 100,000 populace in Western Europe to one for every 100,000 in most Western nations by the start of the twentieth century. Crime rates in real urban communities and in nations tumbled from the mid nineteenth century until the center of the twentieth. From the 1960s to the 1990s, rates for savage and property crimes ascended in all well off Western nations. From that point forward, rates in all have fallen precipitately for murder, thievery, auto robbery, and other property crimes. The examples show up in both police and exploitation information. Rates for nonlethal roughness have fallen forcefully in the English-talking nations and parts of mainland Europe. In different parts of Europe, nonlethal viciousness has been steady or expanding, however the information are most likely off-base.

The subculture of southern violence theory is just one of many cultural transmissions theories discussed in Miller’s text. Cultural transmission theories determine that the values, beliefs, and norms of subcultures (deviant or no) contrast with the dominant culture. Therefore, it is possible for a subculture to justify criminal behavior as normal or necessary when it comes to one’s reputation and self-defense. Because the southern region of the United States is known to have high crime rates than other regions of the United States and as a whole, the subculture of violence theory was hypothesized by Wolfgang and Ferracuti during the late 1960s. Other researchers: Ball-Rokeach, 1973; Erlanger, 1974; and Hartnagel, 1980 theorized what factors may be the cause of the high crime rates in the southern region as well. This discussion will explore the implications of whether or not their findings adequately support the existence of the subculture of southern violence theory.

Throughout the history on the most prevalent crime rates, the United States has ten major states/areas that have been known to be among the most dangerous. These locations have been specifically known for murder, rape, robbery, assault and drug trafficking. The top ten areas are known as Detroit, St. Louis, Oakland, Memphis, Birmingham, Ala., Atlanta, Baltimore, Stockton, and Cleveland, Ohio. While the citizens of these top ten criminal states still live from day to day, one question still remains throughout the United States, which state out of the top 10 remains in the lead for the most dangerous area to live? I will be comparing the statistics of the top 10 areas in the United States in order to thoroughly answer this question.

The dominant culture may not improve these pro-violent values and may penalize at the deviant act but more a person integrated to the subculture of violence more the chance he own the characteristic of that subculture of violence. Friends, peer group and family have an important role in this context. The individual whose peer group or families are involved to use violence the more chances that he will use act of violence. Ellison (1991) is of the view ―The southern subculture of violence theory suggests that individuals socialized in the South learn to approve of violence in a wide range of situations and to view violence as important in enhancing

Race, socioeconomic status, age, and geographic location are a few characteristics that can help determine the likelihood that an individual will be violently victimized. Plenty of researchers have believe that poverty, income inequality, high unemployment rates, and inadequate education cause negative emotionality in a person, which can lead to criminal behavior. Phillips mentions an integrated theory that acknowledges structural and cultural factors that explains the constant crimes and victimization that occurs in America’s inner cities. Cohen et al., Phillips, and Sampson and Lauritsen all use lifestyle-routine activity theory to explain victimization. This particular opportunity model of victimization

Some issues with the crime statistics of arson are that suspicious fires can't be officially reported so there's more set fires than there is in the statistics. Burglary might not be reported because sometimes the thing that's stolen might not even be noticed as missing, at least not for a long time, or the person is scared to report it. Assault victims might be too scared or embarrassed to report the

In addition, Anderson et al. (1989) used the physiological-thermoregulatory model to evaluate different studies to find the relationship between temperature and behavior. When a person is hot or uncomfortable, they become aggressive. Anderson tested the hypothesis, but did not have enough results to support it. This topic has been a well-known interest that researchers have studied and tried to prove a relationship between the two variables. However, there are studies that have proven high crime rates during the