CrimeReportingandVictimization BrittanyEpperly Essay

Crime measurement and statistics for police departments are very important when it comes to money allotment, staffing needs or termination and it is also used to determine the effectiveness of new laws and programs. There are three tools used to measure major crime in the United States: Uniform Crime Reports, National Crime Victimization Survey and the National Incident Based Reporting System- which is currently being tested to replace the Uniform Crime Reports. Although there different tools used to measure crime, crime rates can be deceiving. Each different tool reports a different type of rate, crime rates, arrest

Victimology draws together academics, activists, and policymakers from a variety of backgrounds and identifies three main victimological perspectives. Positivist victimology dates back to the emergence of victimology as a discipline in the 1940s. It looks to understand the process of victimisation and why people become victims of crime by examining the relationship between the victim and offender through an agency lens. Newburn (2013) identifies positivists such as Miers (1989) who see victimisation as being causal in nature and identify three key features:

To deem anyone a victim, he, she, or it must receive harm, negative feelings, or lies, and what is causing the harm must have more power over the victim. This perpetrator receives this power using coercive force, whether or not it is on purpose or a mere accident. This person uses this power to make the victim fear him or her. Nonetheless, there are different types and degrees of victimizing.

The Uniform Crime Report, which was developed in the 1930s, is commonly used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation as a record of crimes committed all across the United States. These crimes, which fall under two categories, Part I and Part II offenses, are reported by local police to the Federal Bureau of Investigation each year. Part I offenses are considered to be the more serious of crimes recognized by society. Such examples of this are homicide, forcible rape, robbery, arson, motor vehicle theft, etc. Part II offenses are those that are considered less serious, such as fraud, simple assault, drug abuse, gambling, stolen property, embezzlement, etc. Part I crimes can also be subdivided into what are known as violent crimes and

evidence so as to connect the crimes to a particular perpetrator whether it be local, countrywide,

The crimes involved in the report only account for crimes verified by the police departments which doesn’t account for crimes even if an arrest was made, the police agencies

Fear should be and probably is the major reason many victims fail to report what has occurred because they are afraid for their lives and family lives as well as safety. Many people have been killed and/or seriously hurt because they simply reported a crime. Personal crimes such as drug use, gambling, and murder are not included in the National Crime Victimization Survey. Question format and sampling errors also are not reported in the National Crime Victimization

There are two programs that measure the magnitude, nature, and impact of crime in the nation. One of them is the Uniform Crime Reporting Program (UCR). The UCR was originally started with only reporting seven major offenses. Which were: murder, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny (theft) and motor vehicle theft. Later on it mandated for an arson to be added therefore making it the eight we have now. The UCR program uses data collected from law enforcement received every month to come up with its report. Along with the numbers for trends and counts for crime. The report has much more information as well. Such as who was arrested, their age, gender, and race.

The upsides of the Uniform Crime Report are it puts genuine crime information into a consumable arrangement. This permits individuals to utilize the uniform crime report with the goal that they get the chance to see where the most secure parts of the nation happen to be. It permits individuals to see the chronicled point of view of crimes. It uncovers the patterns of crime information and can help individuals to comprehend what methodologies were observed to be effective and what patterns ought to simply be scrapped or revised. By seeing what has been effective and what has not been fruitful, it allows the nation to gain from its missteps. It likewise lets society perceive how it has seen crime throughout the years. By seeing how crime has

There are several reasons that victims are not receiving restitution. However, the primary reason is that a significant number of crimes are not reported. Nevertheless, other factors must also be considered, such as offenders not being caught or convicted and victims not going through with prosecution. Apparently, if these factors are eliminated, victims would receive reimbursements, not to mention more criminals would be off the streets (Karmen, 2010).

I think that is a valid question. The truth is I am not sure there is a good answer to your question. There is not a victimless crime, and whether it is a murder, a fraud, a burglary, or a rape, etc. it should not matter what the crime is. We should not work any harder, or less hard just because of the crime classification. Each victim, no matter the crime, deserves our best efforts to investigate the crime.

The contemporary view of the nature of crime places the victim in a passive role relative to a criminal act (Godfrey & Lawrence, 2015). As Godfrey and Lawrence (2015) imply, “ this is not to say that victims are marginalized or ignored […] but rather

Victimology is a topic that has been intriguing to me for a while. It certainly has come a long way since 1947 when Benjamin Mendelsohn coined the term. According to all the history that has been provided since that time many improvements have taken place. Such as the accessibility to information regarding the amount of individuals that are victims of any crime in any specific area at any time. All the reforms, movements and implementations of theories, laws, rights and programs that have taken hold since that time period have been very beneficial for society and makes us more aware of what is out there and how to be prepared for the worst case possible scenario. Out of the many things mentioned in the book Victimology, Leah E. Daigle/Lisa R. Muftic, I was greatly intrigued by the prevention section of it. One thing that caught my eye was the fact that many if not all come to the same conclusion when it comes to crime itself which is, is just simply easier to reduce/remove opportunities that would put us at risk rather than swaying the motivation of any type of offender.

One of the three major perspectives used in Data collection is Police perspective. The police perspective is police reports that are called Uniform Crime Reports (UCR), which are gathered and collected by every police agency in the U.S, and then this data gathered is sent to and collected by the FBI annually. National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) in recent years has been developed to broaden the extent of the bottom of the crime data that is collected by every police department. The NIBRS gathers information (data) on every criminal occurrence and arrests that happen within the 22 offense categories made of 46 specific crimes. The second one is victim perspective, this sections methods are involving the National Crime Victimization

Most victims have no clue about their perpetrators, and they believe whatever rumor is circulating on the Internet or YouTube.